W211 AMG Discuss the W211 AMG's such as the E55 and the E63
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Got a RPF1's Square setup, need some advice

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 02-15-2018, 10:20 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
alenpepic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: New York
Posts: 383
Received 18 Likes on 17 Posts
2005 CL55 (sold) C63 Coupe 2012 p31(sold) Audi 330awhp E55 511WHP(sold)Z06C6 550whp C63 LTH
Got a RPF1's Square setup, need some advice

My car is making over 630 to the crank so I'm getting rid of my 19's. Great news I just got some RPF1's for my E55(I know its a first for E55 haha) , so they are 18x9 all around and 35 offset all around. Im not worried about the rear but how about the front. Would i like to have 275 all around so i can rotate my tires? YESSSS!!! Am i going to be annoyed if i have to get spacers? YESS lmfao! I would love to hear from someone who have done this setup. But i know that the fenders up front are very wide, my only issue is the 35 offset in the front will bring the car too close to the brakes, maybe a 30 offset is more ideal.
Old 02-15-2018, 10:47 AM
  #2  
Member
 
Davednconfused's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: East Coast
Posts: 166
Received 20 Likes on 15 Posts
2005 E55 AMG
They will fit like that, but will look strange. Stock is 18x9 +36 R and 18x8 +30 F. Wider SL wheels are 18x9.5 +33 R and 18x8.5 +30 F - and fits just about perfect in the wheel wells.
Old 02-15-2018, 12:42 PM
  #3  
Newbie
 
imnotstas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Sacramento, CA.
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2006 E55 AMG
Would you be able to post pics when you get the chance?

Always contemplated putting RPF1's on my Pewter E55..
Old 02-15-2018, 09:03 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
alenpepic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: New York
Posts: 383
Received 18 Likes on 17 Posts
2005 CL55 (sold) C63 Coupe 2012 p31(sold) Audi 330awhp E55 511WHP(sold)Z06C6 550whp C63 LTH
Originally Posted by Davednconfused
They will fit like that, but will look strange. Stock is 18x9 +36 R and 18x8 +30 F. Wider SL wheels are 18x9.5 +33 R and 18x8.5 +30 F - and fits just about perfect in the wheel wells.
stock is 39 R and 30F. My front rim is not a 8 it's a 9 so it will compensate for the extra 5mm. The rear will sit perfect. I'm just concerned about 275 up front
Old 02-15-2018, 10:13 PM
  #5  
Member
 
Davednconfused's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: East Coast
Posts: 166
Received 20 Likes on 15 Posts
2005 E55 AMG
Originally Posted by alenpepic


stock is 39 R and 30F. My front rim is not a 8 it's a 9 so it will compensate for the extra 5mm. The rear will sit perfect. I'm just concerned about 275 up front
I have never heard of anyone running a 275 up front. If you search you may be able to find something. From stock wheels - the 18x9 +35 square will extend only 4mm in rear, and then 8mm up front. That is why I cautioned against it probably looking odd with a square setup. I would measure before setting your mind on them.
Old 02-16-2018, 12:37 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
alenpepic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: New York
Posts: 383
Received 18 Likes on 17 Posts
2005 CL55 (sold) C63 Coupe 2012 p31(sold) Audi 330awhp E55 511WHP(sold)Z06C6 550whp C63 LTH
There's quite a few guys running 275's up front on the forums. I have the rims so they going on I'll know right away if they fit when I mount them. There is posts but nobody is giving up their offsets. A 35 in the rear will look more flush then a 39 et e55 rim. A 35 front on a 9 inch rim will be a little more flush then a 8 inch front 30 offset e55 rim because the e55 rim is a full inch smaller, that's why I'm using the word compensate. So I don't understand the looks part being off Bc the fitment will be very similar to a stock e55 maybe more wider looking. But the 275 fitting with my front rim offset is something I'm definitely questioning I may have to go 255 Bc it may rub on the inside only I get a spacer to push it away from the brakes. But 275 all around is definilty doable.
Old 02-16-2018, 01:06 AM
  #7  
tw2
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
tw2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 3,421
Received 284 Likes on 233 Posts
2005 E55 AMG, 1991 MR2
I don't mean to sound like an idiot but what are the advantages of a square set up? If your suspension is in good condition there shouldn't be any significant asymmetrical wear to require frequent rotation and the increased front to rear ratio will increase understeer won't it? Running better tires (if possible) is always the most significant improvement to traction.
Old 02-16-2018, 07:05 AM
  #8  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
tlambert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: SC
Posts: 1,676
Received 254 Likes on 216 Posts
2005 E55 AMG
Burnouts = tire wear.
Old 02-16-2018, 02:41 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
alenpepic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: New York
Posts: 383
Received 18 Likes on 17 Posts
2005 CL55 (sold) C63 Coupe 2012 p31(sold) Audi 330awhp E55 511WHP(sold)Z06C6 550whp C63 LTH
Originally Posted by tw2
I don't mean to sound like an idiot but what are the advantages of a square set up? If your suspension is in good condition there shouldn't be any significant asymmetrical wear to require frequent rotation and the increased front to rear ratio will increase understeer won't it? Running better tires (if possible) is always the most significant improvement to traction.
Your fine I said the same I'm a staggered guy too. I have vids of me take turns on a canyon real hard and what I was experiencing was understeer on lift when I dove into the turn. A square setup is ideal for autocrossing and for a car that does experience understeer. The rotation is a definite plus it will extend the life of the tires by a good 2-3 thousand miles. The more important aspect is the grip up from I have too much power in the car. This setup has been proven wonders for years on corvettes too but there are forums members using them here. Also for some reason enkei 18x9 is a 17 lb rim while 18x8 is a 18lb, I realized the lb less will compensate for extra wieght of the 275 tire Apposed to the 255 or 245 (1lb of unsprung wieght = 10lbs). Also I do realize this is a experiment for me so I'm under the same boat as you but what my math and research says is, Square is the way to go both looks, and performance. It's nice to see a deeper dish all around the car especially when our front fenders are so wide.
Old 02-16-2018, 02:58 PM
  #10  
Member
 
Davednconfused's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: East Coast
Posts: 166
Received 20 Likes on 15 Posts
2005 E55 AMG
My thought is still that the fitment will look goofy - if you've ever messed around with spacers, 4mm vs 8mm is a discernible amount. Your front will be basically flush, while the rear will be just about the same as stock, and sunken back into the fender. Hopefully I am wrong.

My setup extends 6mm front and 12mm rear, and the fitment is almost perfect all around.
Old 02-16-2018, 03:36 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
alenpepic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: New York
Posts: 383
Received 18 Likes on 17 Posts
2005 CL55 (sold) C63 Coupe 2012 p31(sold) Audi 330awhp E55 511WHP(sold)Z06C6 550whp C63 LTH
[QUOTE=Davednconfused;7382854]My thought is still that the fitment will look goofy - if you've ever messed around with spacers, 4mm vs 8mm is a discernible amount. Your front will be basically flush, while the rear will be just about the same as stock, and sunken back into the fender. Hopefully I am wrong.

My setup extends 6mm front and 12mm rear, and the fitment is almost perfect all around.[/QUOTE.


I get what ur saying now, yeah that can be true, but I'm still yet to see the difference Bc I haven't tested them out, so if I feel that the fitment is off in regards to fixing the stance of the car I will def put a spacer out in the back but my arguement for the back is that the 4mm will be enough to even out the front but if not then yeah definilty a spacer is in the works, not really a big deal. But I think it should be minimal as in u won't even notice front in back but that's my guess, I can be totally wrong
Old 02-16-2018, 03:58 PM
  #12  
Member
 
Davednconfused's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: East Coast
Posts: 166
Received 20 Likes on 15 Posts
2005 E55 AMG
Be sure to report back with pictures. I am curious as to how the fitment is, and how our cars look on RPF1's.
Old 02-17-2018, 11:50 AM
  #13  
Newbie
 
VIP_Q45's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 13
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
cls500
Some guy in japan from instagram not sure what his set up is though but it looks good


The following users liked this post:
kevstaarr (08-14-2020)
Old 02-18-2018, 07:21 PM
  #14  
Member
 
bierry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: NJ
Posts: 138
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
E55
Originally Posted by alenpepic
There's quite a few guys running 275's up front on the forums. I have the rims so they going on I'll know right away if they fit when I mount them. There is posts but nobody is giving up their offsets. A 35 in the rear will look more flush then a 39 et e55 rim. A 35 front on a 9 inch rim will be a little more flush then a 8 inch front 30 offset e55 rim because the e55 rim is a full inch smaller, that's why I'm using the word compensate. So I don't understand the looks part being off Bc the fitment will be very similar to a stock e55 maybe more wider looking. But the 275 fitting with my front rim offset is something I'm definitely questioning I may have to go 255 Bc it may rub on the inside only I get a spacer to push it away from the brakes. But 275 all around is definilty doable.
I have run 275/30/19 RE-71s on 19x9.5 ET35 square and currently the same tires on 19x9.5 ET36 square. Different model tires' overall widths notwithstanding, my setup does not rub lock to lock through the full suspension travel. Clears the 8-pots and suspension components without issue. I have used 3mm spacers up front with no tire rubbing. The wheel design will affect whether the center cap clears the front hub grease cap - the ET35s had plenty of clearance while the ET36s just barely fit. Definitely less understeer and the ability to rotate is a plus. '06 E55 stock ride height.
Old 02-20-2018, 02:47 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
alenpepic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: New York
Posts: 383
Received 18 Likes on 17 Posts
2005 CL55 (sold) C63 Coupe 2012 p31(sold) Audi 330awhp E55 511WHP(sold)Z06C6 550whp C63 LTH
Sad news guys I could even get the RPF1's on the front i don't even know if 5-10mm spacers would allow me to get them on the front it seems like the design of the rim, it's hitting the back. I will post the video via my YouTube account.
Old 02-20-2018, 03:24 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
alenpepic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: New York
Posts: 383
Received 18 Likes on 17 Posts
2005 CL55 (sold) C63 Coupe 2012 p31(sold) Audi 330awhp E55 511WHP(sold)Z06C6 550whp C63 LTH
https://youtu.be/MMql5xp8nmU
Old 02-20-2018, 07:14 PM
  #17  
Member
 
bizzy247's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 75
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
'06 R53
It appears the center bore of the wheel isn't large enough, which is weird because aftermarket wheels usually have a large center bore to allow you to buy centering rings.
Old 02-20-2018, 07:37 PM
  #18  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Strigoi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Richmond, CA
Posts: 3,249
Received 256 Likes on 233 Posts
2001 E320 Wagon, 2006 LBZ Silverado, 2007 E63 (sold), 2001 E55 (sold)
Originally Posted by bizzy247
It appears the center bore of the wheel isn't large enough, which is weird because aftermarket wheels usually have a large center bore to allow you to buy centering rings.
The caliper is hitting way before the wheel is even close to being seated. You can see it right before he cuts off the video.
The following users liked this post:
bizzy247 (02-21-2018)
Old 02-20-2018, 08:37 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
alenpepic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: New York
Posts: 383
Received 18 Likes on 17 Posts
2005 CL55 (sold) C63 Coupe 2012 p31(sold) Audi 330awhp E55 511WHP(sold)Z06C6 550whp C63 LTH
Originally Posted by Strigoi
The caliper is hitting way before the wheel is even close to being seated. You can see it right before he cuts off the video.

sorry for the video quality bc it was originally sent to a friend so I didn't take much time. YESS UR CORRECT!! Lol that little issue is costing me 200$ in fees to return the rims haha. Learned big time for this mistake. So the final consensus is ENKEI RPF1's do not clear Big brake kits. They false advertise their products I wish I could speak to their rep's to put them in their place Bc I did all my research. This offset should've worked, everything I had in store for this wheel setup was going to work 275 all around. If anything i would've needed a 2-5mm spacer to barely clear the brake caliper on the front side but this rim was hitting in the wierdest spot, which was telling me that the diameter of the rim itself is too small and henceforth enkei should take that crap out of their advertising that they CLEAR BIG BRAKES pssh. Like u wanna try a setup nobody has but now I know why nobody has this setup and there was no way I was going to run a 20mm spacer lol. But that's my final thoughts on this his whole thread. I hope everyone learns from my mistakes
Old 02-20-2018, 08:43 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
alenpepic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: New York
Posts: 383
Received 18 Likes on 17 Posts
2005 CL55 (sold) C63 Coupe 2012 p31(sold) Audi 330awhp E55 511WHP(sold)Z06C6 550whp C63 LTH

Also this is some researching I did, since Audi's have pretty much similiar fitment like our cars. Here is some shocking stuff to hear

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Got a RPF1's Square setup, need some advice



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:31 AM.