August Issue Top Gear Magazine/M5 Info
PS-Is it me or is the new M5 Dog Ugly?
Last edited by VelocitE55; Aug 13, 2004 at 03:08 AM.
Ah well.. Thank God I took my name off the list for one.

I'M from Toronto too...
BTW SCREW M5 for only 3 grand E55 can be tuned to 580 hp with 646 ft of trq, CHeck evosport stage 2!!!! totally pimp!!!!!!!!!
Last edited by BoBcanada; Aug 13, 2004 at 03:59 PM.
I'M from Toronto too...
BTW SCREW M5 for only 3 grand E55 can be tuned to 580 hp with 646 ft of trq, CHeck evosport stage 2!!!! totally pimp!!!!!!!!!

Trending Topics
anyone esle agrees?
same as i will say M5 could never have 646 ft of trq!
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
I'M from Toronto too...
BTW SCREW M5 for only 3 grand E55 can be tuned to 580 hp with 646 ft of trq, CHeck evosport stage 2!!!! totally pimp!!!!!!!!!

Russian? No. Italian.

I am sure you have seen my car bolt across 407,400,404 at some point.




Last edited by VelocitE55; Aug 14, 2004 at 12:33 AM.
Ah well.. Thank God I took my name off the list for one.

5L and 510Nm is not bad check any NA engine of similar capacity and you'll see.
Its more like 14-15 sec 0-200km/h.
Its performance philosphy is different to AMG so comparing engine torque figures is totally useless. Look at power to weight and you can see they are a good match (M5 & E55)
anyone esle agrees?
same as i will say M5 could never have 646 ft of trq!

The M5 could have 646 lb-ft torque if it was S/C...lol
I think it is amazing that BMW had gone a few steps further in squeezing 100bhp plus hp from 5L which they had in the previous M5. If you read about the car, it has one of the most advanced computer control unit ever made on road cars.
I don't wanna slag off Bimmer because I drive a Benz myself but the M5 is a good car performance wise



