New M5 beats E55 by 10-15 CL to a 155 mph?Autocar first test-drive of the M5...
the e39 can do the same if the e55 let off early!!! wait for the proper comparisons




Many street race winners assume the other driver is going all out, which is not always true. The E55 driver may not have wanted to risk something, whether it be his life, his car or whatever reason and did not go full-on.
Ok, lets do some guessing as to the new M5's straight line potential, pointless I know but lets see.
M5
weight: 1830kgs
power: 500bhp
torque: 520NM
Gallardo:
weight: 1560kgs
power: 493bhp
torque:500Nm
E55
weight:1950kgs
power:476-500bhp you all know the deal here
torque:700-780NM (Jeeze!)
The Gallardo is faster than the E55, but then it does weigh about 400kgs less than the E55. The Gallardo tops out at 192mph due to shorter gearing. The E55 tops out at 208mph. How can something that weighs only 100kgs less than the E55, with the (almost) same torque and power output of the Gallardo, aggressive gearing and still manages 205mph put 10-15 car lengths on the E55? What BULLCRAP.
Anyone care to correct me? And what about power to weight, the M5 has 277bhp per tonne. The E55 has about 250bhp per tonne, The GT2 has a much better power to weight ratio, and yet the M5 is as quick as one!?!?
I'm not doubting the Nring time, handling is BMW's forte, but jeeze straight line performance rivalling a GT2?
Trending Topics
This will kill M5 sales from the start. The purists will scream for the excellent six speed manual BMW offers in the M3. The folks who live in the city or who drive a four door sedan because they carry passengers, will miss a automatic and buy AMG instead.
BMW better license the technology from Audi whose DSG transmission is the better compromise.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
http://www.canadiandriver.com/articles/pw/06m5.htm
and does anyone know whats the time 0-1000m for E55?
coz here is M5 Detailed Specs Sheet:
http://box.motorline.cc/autowelt/pdf/bmw_m5_technik.pdf
AMG officially states a 0-100M for the E55 of : 22.9
So the M5 is quicker by 0.2 of a second, that is such an insignificant advantage over the E55, its embarassing!
I know on the Nring, the car will have us licked, but in everyday encounters, the more respnsive transmission of the E55 will make it impossible for the M5 to catchup. Once that E55 squats and gets shoved forward by 700NM and 500bhp, there's no excuse.
An E55 can do 75-155 in approx 1/2 mi. To lose buy 15 car lengths means almost 300 ft. THEREFORE: in the time the E55 goes 1/2 a mile the M5 supposedly has travelled 3/4 mi. .................That is Bull....!!!
Besides look at the stock #'s
E-55 - 0-62- in 4.4 secs 0-124 in UNDER 15 secs.
M-5 - 0-62- in 4.7 secs 0-124 in 15 secs.
Stock form the E55 is still marginally faster and thats w/o a Renntech upgrade and Headers. The M5 when it gets here will be shown the true straightline 4door Champ!! E55!!!!
As for the writer of the article, it shows he has no clue about what the E55 will do, I think he is satisfying $'s that are paid to his magazine by BMW to make them sound good! A true pity he doesn't have a clue to what we drive!!
:p
Last edited by Belmondo; Sep 14, 2004 at 01:51 PM.
AMG officially states a 0-100M for the E55 of : 22.9
So the M5 is quicker by 0.2 of a second, that is such an insignificant advantage over the E55, its embarassing!
I know on the Nring, the car will have us licked, but in everyday encounters, the more respnsive transmission of the E55 will make it impossible for the M5 to catchup. Once that E55 squats and gets shoved forward by 700NM and 500bhp, there's no excuse.
Yes 0.2 sec IS insignificant, even in 0-60. You can't feel if a car is 0.2 sec quicker than another. But to say this makes every E55 vs E60 M5 thread worthless because that's all you talk about. 0.* of a second faster/slower....
And to say that the E55 has a more responsive transmission!!!!????? It has a very good auto trans but.. come on.. It's an AUTO...
Still Upgraded E55 with Kleemann LSD should kick as$!!!
Oh and for example in Canada they are expecting it late 2005 as 2006 model by then Mercedes will bring E63 with 500 hp and 7g tronic i belive... with more goodies to compete with m5... Maybe they will put ABC suspension system on E63 that would be a nice addition from my point of view!
And to say that the E55 has a more responsive transmission!!!!????? It has a very good auto trans but.. come on.. It's an AUTO...
New M5 should come with CO-Pilot 
So yeah 0.2 seconds is insignificant!

EDIT: BMW M5, 0-1000M : 22.7
AMG officially states a 0-1000M for the E55 of : 22.9
Official time 0-100km/h is 4.7 so if the best test showed 4.2,sec that means 0-1000m would be 22.4 right? So 0.3 sec might play some role lol
Last edited by BoBcanada; Sep 14, 2004 at 02:40 PM.
New M5 should come with CO-Pilot 
:
And if you can program it to find the best gear, whats all this ultimate driving machine and manual nonsense? You're asking a computer to find the best gear, isn't that what an auto transmission does?
And everyone knows the P400 default program and the rest...
The M5 may be faster in a straight line, but it won't obliterate the E55, maybe above 140-150mph, due to its aggressive 7 gears and final ratio, but then again can it get above 155mph?
And if you can't "obliterate" the E55, then whats the point? Lets not even give the 65's or 600's a chance to speak.Once AMG gets hold of 7G tronic, the gap will be even closer.
Still Upgraded E55 with Kleemann LSD should kick as$!!!
Oh and for example in Canada they are expecting it late 2005 as 2006 model by then Mercedes will bring E63 with 500 hp and 7g tronic i belive... with more goodies to compete with m5... Maybe they will put ABC suspension system on E63 that would be a nice addition from my point of view!

Whats up with all this anxiety? Unless you are stupid enough to believe 10-15 cl BS there is no need for all this "irrationally exuberant" speculation.
And everyone knows the P400 default program and the rest...
The M5 may be faster in a straight line,
Its Mind-Boggling how a bunch of BS can produce even bigger buch of BS and speculation. Un fkn blvble.




"The patent (6,752,738) for the 8-Speed Automatic tranny controller for the high-end cars from the SRTs to the AMGs has been approved by the patent office.
DESCRIPTION: "An eight-speed automatic transmission having a compound planetary gear set, a second planetary gear set, and a third planetary gear set each driven by three clutches and fixed to four brakes. A hydraulic control system actuates the eight-speed transmission by selectively energizing a plurality of solenoids that in turn engage the three clutches and four brakes. The hydraulic control system provides electronically modulated converter clutch control to the eight-speed automatic transmission system when the hydraulic system is in a drive position, a manual/low position, and a park/neutral position"
INVENTOR: Botosan; Valentin (Rochester, MI); Martin; Berthold (Shelby Township, MI)"
And if you can program it to find the best gear, whats all this ultimate driving machine and manual nonsense? You're asking a computer to find the best gear, isn't that what an auto transmission does?
With true automatic like in the E55 there is power loss from torque converter and gear change is not as fast. So there is a draw back to true automatic vs. clutch pedal less SMG.


