W211 AMG Discuss the W211 AMG's such as the E55 and the E63
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

83mm Pulley without Headers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 02-01-2023, 08:17 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
CLS55_Ian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2022
Location: Orlando
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
CLS55
83mm Pulley without Headers

So I have a completely stock engine with a PLM XL heat exchanger and Bosch 010 pump. Is it ok to upgrade to a 83mm pulley with the stock headers? Are better headers necessary for engine reliability? I know the stock headers are very restrictive and I dont know what the implications are of improving the intake without improving the exhaust.
The following users liked this post:
Rallyboy383 (02-02-2023)
Old 02-01-2023, 08:43 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
lost27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Received 53 Likes on 39 Posts
CLS55 AMG
Go read my build thread.
Old 02-01-2023, 10:53 PM
  #3  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
CLS55_Ian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2022
Location: Orlando
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
CLS55
Originally Posted by lost27
Go read my build thread.
I read your thread. Thanks for putting that thread together; it was nice seeing the power gains I could expect. However, I didnt see an answer to my question in that thread. I saw a comparison of power with and without headers, but no mention of reliability without headers.
Old 02-02-2023, 04:43 AM
  #4  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
99lightning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: new ringgold pa
Posts: 1,482
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes on 24 Posts
99 ford lightning
you will not get the full potential without the headers, stock boost need headers on these cars, add that extra boost, and heat due to stock manifolds a dialed back tune will keep the car more than ok but kind of blah to drive.
The following users liked this post:
UncleBenz55 (02-12-2023)
Old 02-02-2023, 07:37 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
lost27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Received 53 Likes on 39 Posts
CLS55 AMG
Originally Posted by CLS55_Ian
...no mention of reliability without headers.
I had zero issues running just the 83mm pulley and would have been fine leaving that as is especially with the cooling mods. That said if I were to do it all over, I'd do the headers first and see how that is. It'll help the engine breath more and keep the intake temps down since you're not adding more boost. I should have stopped with the pulley and headers because the 82mm throttlebody was just one giant, expensive headache.
Old 02-02-2023, 08:03 AM
  #6  
Super Member
 
machild's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 971
Likes: 0
Received 239 Likes on 200 Posts
2006 CLS55 AMG, 2005 SLK 350 AMG
Originally Posted by lost27
I had zero issues running just the 83mm pulley and would have been fine leaving that as is especially with the cooling mods. That said if I were to do it all over, I'd do the headers first and see how that is. It'll help the engine breath more and keep the intake temps down since you're not adding more boost. I should have stopped with the pulley and headers because the 82mm throttlebody was just one giant, expensive headache.
But, the throttle body issue is now resolved?? Got it resolved with the Race IQ tune?
Old 02-02-2023, 08:06 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
lost27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Received 53 Likes on 39 Posts
CLS55 AMG
Originally Posted by machild
But, the throttle body issue is now resolved?? Got it resolved with the Race IQ tune?
Yea, so far it's been good, been waiting a little longer before posting about it. It does on paper make less hp than the EC tune before but w/o the hiccup issues so I'll take that and call it a day on power mods.
Old 02-02-2023, 08:16 AM
  #8  
Super Member
 
machild's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 971
Likes: 0
Received 239 Likes on 200 Posts
2006 CLS55 AMG, 2005 SLK 350 AMG
Originally Posted by lost27
Yea, so far it's been good, been waiting a little longer before posting about it. It does on paper make less hp than the EC tune before but w/o the hiccup issues so I'll take that and call it a day on power mods.
What is different with the tune that resolves the issue?
Old 02-02-2023, 08:43 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
lost27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Received 53 Likes on 39 Posts
CLS55 AMG
Originally Posted by machild
What is different with the tune that resolves the issue?
Man, that is the million dollar question. I was not able to get much insight from Tony on what was different. It is a more conservative tune and the dyno operator commented that it felt like the supercharger "came on later" than with the previous tune for whatever that means. There may be a difference in the base map used as well as in the timing/fuel maps but again, that is speculative as I don't have access to the maps used. I do still see STFTs as high as +25 occasionally but I have not had the hiccup nor have I encountered the rough lumpy idle associated afterwards. At idle in park after seeing +25s the STFT return to normal and stay steady. For me, paying for a new tune from RaceIQ and renting dyno time for him to dial it in was worth it for my peace of mind.
Old 02-02-2023, 09:04 AM
  #10  
Super Member
 
machild's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 971
Likes: 0
Received 239 Likes on 200 Posts
2006 CLS55 AMG, 2005 SLK 350 AMG
Originally Posted by lost27
Man, that is the million dollar question. I was not able to get much insight from Tony on what was different. It is a more conservative tune and the dyno operator commented that it felt like the supercharger "came on later" than with the previous tune for whatever that means. There may be a difference in the base map used as well as in the timing/fuel maps but again, that is speculative as I don't have access to the maps used. I do still see STFTs as high as +25 occasionally but I have not had the hiccup nor have I encountered the rough lumpy idle associated afterwards. At idle in park after seeing +25s the STFT return to normal and stay steady. For me, paying for a new tune from RaceIQ and renting dyno time for him to dial it in was worth it for my peace of mind.
Thank you for this update on a very long journey not only for you but many others.
Old 02-02-2023, 11:01 AM
  #11  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
ArmoE55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,028
Received 125 Likes on 95 Posts
2006 E55
I did an 83mm and off shelf box tune and have ZERO cooling/IAT issues and the car runs like a raped ape. With pulley mods, highly recommend a belt wrap kit - people will argue it does not do anything, it does (stable and consistent boost all the way to redline without losing pressure). Buy a kit. An 83mm is ~6mm (if I recall correctly, I measured it at ~89mm) different than stock; we aren't talking 77mm or smaller fixed pulley here. You will gain ~1,5-2psi with the 83. I have the exact cooling mods; PLM XL and Bosch 010. No heat issues even after multiple back to back WOT runs. With all the M113K cars, every car is different and responds differently. From feel, to power, to overall delivery.

How many miles are on your car, OP? Is maintenance up to date? If yes and if done correctly with cooling in place, you will not have problems with an 83 and intake temps.

You do not need headers to add an 83mm. Anybody that says that does not have enough experience with these cars. My third 2006, I owned two other 2006 before. I've done all the mods, some left out and won't do again, some same as I did on this one. Having said that, this is not taking away anything from long tubes. This car's bottleneck are 100% the manifolds. From all the E55s I've owned, thousands and thousands of miles with just an upper 83mm and stock manifolds, no issues - and I romp on this daily car a lot.

Your reliability depends on the tune (air/fuel) more than anything else once you add an upper pulley... headers do not 'add' reliability nor take away from it. They simply make it easier to make the power (less boost/boost loss).

Lastly, just because I am in a good mood today - stay away from any and all throttle body upgrades. Some people swear by them and have success (I guess everyone's idea of success is different) but I don't care what anyone else says, they cause headaches and problems left and right. Serious or subtle, if not immediately, eventually.

Last edited by ArmoE55; 02-02-2023 at 03:51 PM.
The following users liked this post:
Fountain35 (02-03-2023)
Old 02-02-2023, 11:24 AM
  #12  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
CLS55_Ian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2022
Location: Orlando
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
CLS55
Thanks ArmoE55, I have ~95k miles and the car us up to date on all mainetenance.
Old 02-10-2023, 01:55 PM
  #13  
Super Member
 
Fountain35's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Virginia
Posts: 794
Received 144 Likes on 108 Posts
N/A
My thought on pulleys.

-83mm Pulley swap with tune, no other modifications needed BUT a Bosch 010 pump and a bigger heat exchanger definitely recommended.
-77mm Pulley swap with tune, heat exchanger and 010 pump upgrade at minimum. Some shops also recommend larger injectors. Headers, preferably LT help with the back pressure and nice bump in hp.

These are results of just pulley swaps from a well know shop in England.

In order to test the pulley we decided to use the same car and ran it in 3 states of set up;

1) Stock - 423.7bhp / 475lb/ft (500 / 561)
2) 83mm -480.5bhp / 532.66lb/ft (567 / 629)
3) 77mm -509.3bhp / 596.80lb/ft (601 / 704)


1) Stock (OEM supercharger pulley)
2) Euro-charged 83mm supercharger pulley (X pipe fitted in place of secondary cats and resonator removed)
3) As above with 77mm Supercharger pulley


The power and torque figures at the wheels were as follows (flywheel in brackets);
[img][/img]



https://forums.mbclub.co.uk/threads/...o-test.189064/

Last edited by Fountain35; 02-10-2023 at 02:11 PM.
Old 02-10-2023, 04:19 PM
  #14  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
CLS55_Ian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2022
Location: Orlando
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
CLS55
This great info. I'm pretty impressed by the numbers. I had a previous post where I ask about how to keep my car as quiet as possible while adding LTH. Looking at those numbers, maybe just adding the 83mm pulley will do.
The following users liked this post:
Rallyboy383 (02-11-2023)
Old 02-12-2023, 06:48 AM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
UncleBenz55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2021
Location: Germany RLP
Posts: 368
Received 160 Likes on 98 Posts
W211 E220, W211 E55, W219 CLS 500
Originally Posted by ArmoE55

You do not need headers to add an 83mm. Anybody that says that does not have enough experience with these cars. My third 2006, I owned two other 2006 before. I've done all the mods, some left out and won't do again, some same as I did on this one. Having said that, this is not taking away anything from long tubes. This car's bottleneck are 100% the manifolds. From all the E55s I've owned, thousands and thousands of miles with just an upper 83mm and stock manifolds, no issues - and I romp on this daily car a lot.

Your reliability depends on the tune (air/fuel) more than anything else once you add an upper pulley... headers do not 'add' reliability nor take away from it. They simply make it easier to make the power (less boost/boost loss).

Lastly, just because I am in a good mood today - stay away from any and all throttle body upgrades. Some people swear by them and have success (I guess everyone's idea of success is different) but I don't care what anyone else says, they cause headaches and problems left and right. Serious or subtle, if not immediately, eventually.
I'd definitely add better headers. The first power mod on my car was mid tube headers with everything else stock. Even with the stock pulley and stock mapping, the car pulled faster from 100-200 by about 0.7s after adding mid tube headers and no pre cats. Those stock manifolds are a bottleneck even on a 100% stock engine. Headers will reduce your boost pressure, because you will improve air flow on the engine. This will put less stress on your intercooler and supercharger and your engine will dissipate the exhaust heat better. You'll also be eliminating the possibility of your pre cats failing and getting sucked into the engine causing a complete engine failure.

If you use the 80mm throttle body (which is in fact a 78mm diameter) there will be no issues. Those throttle bodies came stock on our engines in the SL55 evo, G55 and clk dtm. The M273 82mm ones are problematic though.

Personally I prefer stockish pulleys, which make less torque, which makes the car more driveable in practical use. With 900Nm torque,, most of it will go into wheelspin aka burnt rubber. Also less stress on the gearbox.

In summary, 83mm with stock headers will work, but adding better headers would be advisable.
The following users liked this post:
nd-photo.nl (02-13-2023)
Old 02-12-2023, 07:22 AM
  #16  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
99lightning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: new ringgold pa
Posts: 1,482
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes on 24 Posts
99 ford lightning
for me too the headers provided way more of a light , part and med pull, because other then testing something or at the track i do not floor my car no need to because its flying by the time i part throttle it and spinning.
Old 02-12-2023, 05:56 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
M5 LOL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Tacoma
Posts: 341
Received 152 Likes on 98 Posts
05 E55 (06 E55 RIP)
LTs and cooling should always be the first mods before adding boost.
The following users liked this post:
nd-photo.nl (02-13-2023)
Old 02-14-2023, 12:01 AM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
CDC55AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 318
Received 47 Likes on 40 Posts
CLS55AMG
I run an 83mm clutched pulley with stock manifolds still along with RaceIQ stage 2 tune and VRP SECONDARY heat exchanger with Bosch 010 pump that runs whenever key is on due to the ECU tune. I do have a belt wrap kit but I only got it because the TCU tune shifted to fast that the deceleration of the drive pulleys made the supercharger belt chip in shifts. The wrap kit did alleviate the chirp. Very happy with the car but I crave something louder so saving up LTH... most likely MBH headers. This is on a CLS55.
The following users liked this post:
nd-photo.nl (02-14-2023)
Old 02-14-2023, 01:57 PM
  #19  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
nd-photo.nl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2022
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,798
Received 462 Likes on 401 Posts
2005 CLS55 AMG W219 C219
Do you have a build thread in the CLS section?

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: 83mm Pulley without Headers



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:14 AM.