Ferrari 458 vs E63 with ECU
Mercedes E63 AMG Evotech vs Ferrari 458 Italia - Street race featuring Mercedes E63 AMG Evotech tune vs Ferrari 458 Italia.
A bit too much pride there.
Trending Topics
Seriously, that's what I'll do.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Ferrari was made for the track, Mercedes was made for the street in a comfortable manner. There's a reason people choose an E63 over an EVO that's essentially a tin can with no amenities or refinement.
These cars (458, Aventador, Zonda, etc) are all designed to be driven on the road and enjoyed as such. Some of them are much better suited to every day conditions. People daily drive F40s. I wouldn't, but I daily drove Maranellos with complete comfort and reliability (seriously, Ferraris have been the most reliable cars I've owned - considerably moreso than any MB in my possession). If I had a 458, I'd drive it rain or shine, sleet or mud. It'd be very capable as such.
Basically you're speaking out of ignorance. Yeah, it's cool that a fast wagon with some tuning can out-drag a performance car, but it's apples and battleships. I love me a fast wagon and will be taking my FF up to Tahoe during winter for snowboarding season, but the point of the wagon is to be able to carry people and still have a bit of 'oomph' to be able to get on with some decent passing speed, etc. Maybe a bit of towing too. That's all, and that's all I intend to do with mine when it lands.
--Dan
--Dan
I'll readily say that you can "use" more of the car on track than on the street, but any track day you do - what would you rather have? Something purpose-built, or some kind of compromise that will have brake fade, soft suspension, crappy driving dynamics, etc? Spend two days (or a long day) in a road car out there and you feel like crap. Go out in something (yeah, a radical would be awesome though I've never driven one) designed to be there and it's infinitely better. Doesn't have to be expensive (you could probably pick up the same thing I've got for ~40k) - but it will be a materially better driving experience during any track day or event. Suddenly you'll realize just how awful any street car is in that environment. That's why no one has been able to build a true dual-purpose car.
--Dan
I'll readily say that you can "use" more of the car on track than on the street, but any track day you do - what would you rather have? Something purpose-built, or some kind of compromise that will have brake fade, soft suspension, crappy driving dynamics, etc? Spend two days (or a long day) in a road car out there and you feel like crap. Go out in something (yeah, a radical would be awesome though I've never driven one) designed to be there and it's infinitely better. Doesn't have to be expensive (you could probably pick up the same thing I've got for ~40k) - but it will be a materially better driving experience during any track day or event. Suddenly you'll realize just how awful any street car is in that environment. That's why no one has been able to build a true dual-purpose car
--Dan
Nobody is saying a Ferrari 458 is a Radical, which is what I was explaining.
Brake fade? They're carbon ceramics - most of the time it's driver error and has to do with the fluid...
You do realize this got blown out of proportion because some idiot thinks his 4000+lb highway cruiser is some sort of super 3000lb 550+hp semi-track car killer? I'm starting to think I should use the internet less, if only it wasn't my job to build websites
.Remember I kept on mentioning, "straight line only," since E63 (esp the wagon) is mostly a semi-utilitarian type of car with a bit of "ooomph." Thus it's not everyday when you see such a semi-track car being out-run on the straight by a semi-utilitarian car that's much heavier and at less than half of the cost. It's the same kick I got from watching the S65 vs Murcielago on youtube, or GTR outrunning lots of other big dogs on Top Gear. That's all there is.
Speaking of utilitarian vehicle with a good bit of oomph and decent safety...it should probably be G63/G65 for my weekly-biweekly run to the airport and shopping centers 100 miles away year-round through potholes ridden sections (through heavy snow in winter and going offroad being helpful at times); where it's uncommon to have 5+ full sized suitcases and tons of groceries overflowing onto the rear seats. With that, I don't think any Ferrari or Lambo would even come close to my definition of daily driver.
By the way, it's hard to associate italian built machines with reliability since they are usually not synonymous with such. Moreover, it's already well known that quite a few 458's were engulfed in flame and also one recentlyl with a FF.
Brake fade? They're carbon ceramics - most of the time it's driver error and has to do with the fluid...

--Dan
By the way, it's hard to associate italian built machines with reliability since they are usually not synonymous with such. Moreover, it's already well known that quite a few 458's were engulfed in flame and also one recentlyl with a FF.
--Dan
Even real race cars are obsolete after 1 season.
As for tracking a road car, it is more fun to drive a slow car fast than to drive a fast car slow.
If a Ferrari cant be considered a track car there must be a bad driver behind the wheel.
--Dan
I have heard that MB's reliability seems to have gotten better after they cut loose Chrysler. Only time will tell.






