Why not 295/30- 19s.....




As they dont come in 285/30s, the other option is 295/30s while keeping my 19 inch wheels.
I checked out a tire calculator and noted that bone stock the front 255/35s are taller than the rear 285s......so first question why did mercs put a taller tire in the fronts? Is there a performance advantage to that???
And when comparing the 295 vs the 285's , the 295s are closer in size to the fronts 255s than the 285s are.
Stats are.
255 285 295
Overall diam... 661.1mm 653.6mm 659.6mm
Sidewall ht 89.25 85.50 88.5
circumference 81.77 inch 80.84inch 81.57inch
http://1010tires.com/Tools/Tire-Size...5R19/295-30R19




Are PS2's still around, werent they the top tire to get
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Mounting too wide a tire may have a bulging effect on the sidewall and may have an effect on understeer. If you're mainly driving on the street, then you may not care about either.




i might just stick with pzeros and just do the rears for now, keep the fronts as tehy still have some thread on them....wait until 285 comes out or something
It's rather strange that MB went with 9.5" on the rear oem rims for the E when they should have just made it 10" like the CLS. The oem MB setup seems to have the oem rim around an inch smaller than oem section width for the C and CLS, but that's not the case for E's rear.
Does anyone know why MB went with the 9.5" rear for the E? Otherwise, the CLS and E are idential mechanically other than perhaps a lower center of gravity for the CLS.
That defeats the purpose of having a performance car. LOL




as the forged wheel option was a seperate option that the pp, for instance my car has PP but i wanted one with the 10 spoke wheels, where as others dont have the PP but get the forged.



