Why not 295/30- 19s.....
#1
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Why not 295/30- 19s.....
so after 15000 miles i shall finally be changing my tires. I think the Pzeros have been pretty good overall, but i am curious about Pilot supersports.
As they dont come in 285/30s, the other option is 295/30s while keeping my 19 inch wheels.
I checked out a tire calculator and noted that bone stock the front 255/35s are taller than the rear 285s......so first question why did mercs put a taller tire in the fronts? Is there a performance advantage to that???
And when comparing the 295 vs the 285's , the 295s are closer in size to the fronts 255s than the 285s are.
Stats are.
255 285 295
Overall diam... 661.1mm 653.6mm 659.6mm
Sidewall ht 89.25 85.50 88.5
circumference 81.77 inch 80.84inch 81.57inch
http://1010tires.com/Tools/Tire-Size...5R19/295-30R19
As they dont come in 285/30s, the other option is 295/30s while keeping my 19 inch wheels.
I checked out a tire calculator and noted that bone stock the front 255/35s are taller than the rear 285s......so first question why did mercs put a taller tire in the fronts? Is there a performance advantage to that???
And when comparing the 295 vs the 285's , the 295s are closer in size to the fronts 255s than the 285s are.
Stats are.
255 285 295
Overall diam... 661.1mm 653.6mm 659.6mm
Sidewall ht 89.25 85.50 88.5
circumference 81.77 inch 80.84inch 81.57inch
http://1010tires.com/Tools/Tire-Size...5R19/295-30R19
#4
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
they are a heck of alot cheaper too, per tirerack, overall around 300bucks less....which i thought was really odd
Are PS2's still around, werent they the top tire to get
Are PS2's still around, werent they the top tire to get
#5
I just took off the P Zeros and went with 295s pilot super sport on the stock wheels and I am happy with it. Car sticks better and I saved $300 on the set instead of going back with the P Zeros.
Trending Topics
#8
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
On that tire calculator I posted it says that the wheel needs to be a 10-11 inch. But obviously we use a 9.5. So there must be some give and take
#9
You can mount it...some shops may not want to for legal liability purposes if they follow the tire sizing charts strictly.
Mounting too wide a tire may have a bulging effect on the sidewall and may have an effect on understeer. If you're mainly driving on the street, then you may not care about either.
Mounting too wide a tire may have a bulging effect on the sidewall and may have an effect on understeer. If you're mainly driving on the street, then you may not care about either.
#11
MBWorld Fanatic!
Yes, it will cause the sidewall to flex quite a bit with an under-sized rim like what sikm3 had mentioned. Or you can get a set of rear oem 18" like mine since PSS has the size for them.
#12
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
yeah thats not ever happening
i might just stick with pzeros and just do the rears for now, keep the fronts as tehy still have some thread on them....wait until 285 comes out or something
i might just stick with pzeros and just do the rears for now, keep the fronts as tehy still have some thread on them....wait until 285 comes out or something
#13
Member
#15
MBWorld Fanatic!
Okay, I've posted the following on the CLS side but here is more appropriate for the question I have at the end:
It's rather strange that MB went with 9.5" on the rear oem rims for the E when they should have just made it 10" like the CLS. The oem MB setup seems to have the oem rim around an inch smaller than oem section width for the C and CLS, but that's not the case for E's rear.
Does anyone know why MB went with the 9.5" rear for the E? Otherwise, the CLS and E are idential mechanically other than perhaps a lower center of gravity for the CLS.
It's rather strange that MB went with 9.5" on the rear oem rims for the E when they should have just made it 10" like the CLS. The oem MB setup seems to have the oem rim around an inch smaller than oem section width for the C and CLS, but that's not the case for E's rear.
Does anyone know why MB went with the 9.5" rear for the E? Otherwise, the CLS and E are idential mechanically other than perhaps a lower center of gravity for the CLS.
#17
MBWorld Fanatic!
The rear CLS63's oem wheels are 10", even the offset is different at 2.05". The offset for the E63's rear is 1.85". Thus can't really just swap the wheels from the CLS63. The front offset for both the CLS and E are the same.
#21
MBWorld Fanatic!
That defeats the purpose of having a performance car. LOL
#25
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
i dont think that was the case with the 212 and 218 models,
as the forged wheel option was a seperate option that the pp, for instance my car has PP but i wanted one with the 10 spoke wheels, where as others dont have the PP but get the forged.
as the forged wheel option was a seperate option that the pp, for instance my car has PP but i wanted one with the 10 spoke wheels, where as others dont have the PP but get the forged.