What's the deal with the TCU on these cars?
If it's the exact same failure then maybe we could learn something to prevent it happening to someone else. Anyway Inshaallah I will find a way to get ahold of him myself.
If it's the exact same failure then maybe we could learn something to prevent it happening to someone else. Anyway Inshaallah I will find a way to get ahold of him myself.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
In any case if you rely on weistec calibration you will not get those times. Why else would Fairbird have to recalibrate on his own??
2 weistec e63s, 1 shop car and another customer car, both lost to renntech intermediate tune + down pipes e64 at shift sector 1/2 mile roll event. Renntech e63 did not have the full exhaust like weistec e63, renntech car had severely restrictive factory turboback pipes+ rado downpipe and pump gas tune. Weistec cars has ice tank, intake full Boltons. Weistec exhaust replaces the restrictive Factory turbo back pipes with much bigger pipes that don't even fit with the factory motor mounts requiring their own low profile motor mount
Now somebody explain that to me
Doesn't matter awd or rwd, car with the most power wins assuming driver doesn't completely suck. Awd can win with less power from stop if it's hard to launch rwd well. Rwd will win up top assuming similar power levels
Doesn't matter awd or rwd, car with the most power wins assuming driver doesn't completely suck. Awd can win with less power from stop if it's hard to launch rwd well. Rwd will win up top assuming similar power levels
Up top with similar or less power AWD will always lose to RWD.
The question is how much extra power in this case would AWD need to outrun a RWD from a roll.
Ive always wondered how much higher the drivetrain loss is with the 4matic 33/67 they use vs RWD.
Up top with similar or less power AWD will always lose to RWD.
The question is how much extra power in this case would AWD need to outrun a RWD from a roll.
Ive always wondered how much higher the drivetrain loss is with the 4matic 33/67 they use vs RWD.
one of the problems with all-wheel drive and the staggered setup is a difference in rolling circumference which will add to the drivetrain loss by introducing a second element of drag where all four wheels want to turn at the same speed but are forced to turn at different speeds because of different rolling circumference. I don't know how much this adds to the drag whether it's negligible or significant. You can put identical wheels up front and behind or you can use pilot supersports 295 30 19 rear and 255 35 19 front. This is the only combination I'm aware of that has identical rolling circumference for front and rear. 295 will not fit on the factory 9.5" wide rear wheels, Michelin recommend minimum 10" width wheel
Awd vs rwd race
https://youtu.be/OxWhFn68MIs
Awd vs rwd race
https://youtu.be/OxWhFn68MIs
about the AWD vs RWD race with the e63 va cls63.
From this video you posted, which I did as well it doesn't look to be a huge difference in drivetrain losses.
Im not sure how much more the staggered tires add but it seems like only a 5-6% difference.
In in this video however it looks like the drivetrain loss is MUCH higher but I don't believe it's accurate. Something seems off because the cls creams the E despite the E having equal weight and extra 20 hp. Let's not forget than in the 1/4 mile there's only a 1-2mph advantage for RWD e63 vs AWD e63 if not anything.







