another pureturbo upgraded e63
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,841
Likes: 202
From: miami / delray beach
2014 E63s amg 4matic, 2009 C63, 2006 E55 AMG , 2001.5 AUDI S4 stg 3+ w/meth
another pureturbo upgraded e63
just saw this from the same tuner of the 840+whp e63... looks like they keep the tune even safer on this one and still made 750+whp 
2015 e63s. Precision tuned to 752 whp. Upgraded turbos, intakes, exhaust.
and they also did a 775WHP CLS on only 22psi
it was forced performance turbo, not pureturbos
2015 e63s. Precision tuned to 752 whp. Upgraded turbos, intakes, exhaust.
and they also did a 775WHP CLS on only 22psi
it was forced performance turbo, not pureturbosLast edited by gaspam; Jan 29, 2017 at 12:16 PM.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 6,775
Likes: 1,152
From: NY
E63S | X5
May have missed it in the original thread, but what are these guys doing to protect the tranny? Are these cars going with upgraded trannies / clutch packs? Or are they just rolling the dice?
These numbers are no doubt appealing, but I don't want to grenade transmission after transmission just to run it.
These numbers are no doubt appealing, but I don't want to grenade transmission after transmission just to run it.
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,841
Likes: 202
From: miami / delray beach
2014 E63s amg 4matic, 2009 C63, 2006 E55 AMG , 2001.5 AUDI S4 stg 3+ w/meth
nothing done to tranny on the 840whp e63... nothing on the 750 whp e63
the CLS guy has had 2 bulletproof trans break before he even got the turbo upgrade from what i read, so seems bulletproof trans are not that bulletproof.... from what i read he is looking into getting Level 10 to build him one
seems like the stock transmissions are holding up better than the bulletproof ones
the CLS guy has had 2 bulletproof trans break before he even got the turbo upgrade from what i read, so seems bulletproof trans are not that bulletproof.... from what i read he is looking into getting Level 10 to build him one
seems like the stock transmissions are holding up better than the bulletproof ones
Trending Topics
Super Member
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 773
Likes: 44
C300
MB World Stories
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)
Verdad Gallardo
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren
Verdad Gallardo
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine
Verdad Gallardo
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction
Verdad Gallardo
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping
Verdad Gallardo
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 6,775
Likes: 1,152
From: NY
E63S | X5
Yeah, too risky for my blood at this point. If I want to get to where these cars it seems that switching platforms would be the better move. No doubt the E is pretty quick out there compared to most, but I guess its just time to settle with the fact it won't get to that real monster level without a major failure/problem lurking in the shadows.
I remember how I felt driving my PFL C63 around without a warranty waiting for a headbolt to fail, no reason to feel that way in this car too.
But in the meantime I will definitely enjoy those who are crazy enough to go after those big numbers and low times.
I remember how I felt driving my PFL C63 around without a warranty waiting for a headbolt to fail, no reason to feel that way in this car too.
But in the meantime I will definitely enjoy those who are crazy enough to go after those big numbers and low times.
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,841
Likes: 202
From: miami / delray beach
2014 E63s amg 4matic, 2009 C63, 2006 E55 AMG , 2001.5 AUDI S4 stg 3+ w/meth
yeah true but i think your stock trans had a factory defect output shaft since you broke your output shaft before stock clutch packs even started slipping
Super Member
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 773
Likes: 44
C300
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 390
Likes: 27
From: Queens,New York
E63s
Yeah, too risky for my blood at this point. If I want to get to where these cars it seems that switching platforms would be the better move. No doubt the E is pretty quick out there compared to most, but I guess its just time to settle with the fact it won't get to that real monster level without a major failure/problem lurking in the shadows.
I remember how I felt driving my PFL C63 around without a warranty waiting for a headbolt to fail, no reason to feel that way in this car too.
But in the meantime I will definitely enjoy those who are crazy enough to go after those big numbers and low times.
I remember how I felt driving my PFL C63 around without a warranty waiting for a headbolt to fail, no reason to feel that way in this car too.
But in the meantime I will definitely enjoy those who are crazy enough to go after those big numbers and low times.
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 390
Likes: 27
From: Queens,New York
E63s
I had a Supercharged Denali and never broke the trans , my friend had the same in a Tahoe and broke countless transmissions ,same 4L60 trans, all input and output shafts snapping like twigs, He even snapped a $1000 unbreakable shaft from Raptor .Well we found out it was from the tune he removed all torque management , he thought he would get more power by removing it , Yeah but then you start breaking ****!
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 1,370
Likes: 40
CLS63 AMG
Yeah, too risky for my blood at this point. If I want to get to where these cars it seems that switching platforms would be the better move. No doubt the E is pretty quick out there compared to most, but I guess its just time to settle with the fact it won't get to that real monster level without a major failure/problem lurking in the shadows.
I remember how I felt driving my PFL C63 around without a warranty waiting for a headbolt to fail, no reason to feel that way in this car too.
But in the meantime I will definitely enjoy those who are crazy enough to go after those big numbers and low times.
I remember how I felt driving my PFL C63 around without a warranty waiting for a headbolt to fail, no reason to feel that way in this car too.
But in the meantime I will definitely enjoy those who are crazy enough to go after those big numbers and low times.
if they don't change that, the torque limits should still stay in place to protect the tranny. The downside is that no matter how much hp this car gets those torque limits will always give throttle lag from off the line and it really sucks.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 1,370
Likes: 40
CLS63 AMG
not to mention this setup with AWD providing over 600whp/700wtq will be enough to destroy most cars that try to touch it.
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 390
Likes: 27
From: Queens,New York
E63s
Yeah , exactly , I live in NYC so light to light for me,today most high Hp cars are rear wheel drive and if there not running the right tire all you see in the rear view mirror is a car pulling out of a pile of smoke ,and it sucks driving on the street with slicks , handling is just gone, I had a mid 11 second Buick Grand National and with regular tires once I hit boost up in smoke,it was useless from a dig on regular tires unless I had a slick , drag radials worked a little better,
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,841
Likes: 202
From: miami / delray beach
2014 E63s amg 4matic, 2009 C63, 2006 E55 AMG , 2001.5 AUDI S4 stg 3+ w/meth
I had a Supercharged Denali and never broke the trans , my friend had the same in a Tahoe and broke countless transmissions ,same 4L60 trans, all input and output shafts snapping like twigs, He even snapped a $1000 unbreakable shaft from Raptor .Well we found out it was from the tune he removed all torque management , he thought he would get more power by removing it , Yeah but then you start breaking ****!
and if you look at most tuned dyno graphs vs upgraded turbo graphs on our platform you will see that the trq/ hp is about the same up until about 3.5-5K rpms and then after that's where the turbo upgrades start to put 100-200 hp over the tune only stock turbo graphs, so that is much easier on the trans than if the car had 100-200 hp more at 1K rpm
really the turbo upgrades arent adding that much trq, they are just able to hold it longer to redline, instead of running out of breath up top, thus most of the added power is up top not down low on launches where tranny is more likely to break.... so you chance of breaking tranny is probably pretty similar with just a tune since same trq /power down low... my renntech tune/dp dyno makes +50trq more than renntech turbo upgrade at 2500 rpm
Last edited by gaspam; Jan 29, 2017 at 11:31 AM.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,895
Likes: 53
From: Maryland
'14 E63S & '14 Audi SQ5
Super Member
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 773
Likes: 44
C300
TCU responsible for shifting and oil pressure , all the limits in the ECU , I had of the shelf stage 1 from them , no tq limits were removed . when I had bulletproff trans they removed them , I can tell the different in my 0-60 times
