W212 AMG Discuss the W212 AMG's such as the E63
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Turbo Back Downpipe Install

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 05-02-2018, 06:34 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
try m3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 336
Received 100 Likes on 47 Posts
M3, E55, cls63
Turbo Back Downpipe Install

Hey guys I just got my boost logic down pipes in and was getting ready to have them installed is there any gaskets or things I should have replaced while doing this? Is there a gasket between the bridge pipe and turbo if so do you guys have a part number?

Thanks
Old 05-03-2018, 01:11 PM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Vrodman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 1,397
Received 198 Likes on 137 Posts
2015 E63s AMG, 2020 GLC 43 AMG
Sorry, no answer to this. But out of curiosity, do you have to pull the engine to install the new down pipes?
Old 05-03-2018, 09:02 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
try m3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 336
Received 100 Likes on 47 Posts
M3, E55, cls63
Originally Posted by Vrodman
Sorry, no answer to this. But out of curiosity, do you have to pull the engine to install the new down pipes?
My car is a 2013 rwd so I don't believe I need to drop the engine for install but the awd cars you have to drop the engine.
Old 06-27-2018, 12:54 PM
  #4  
Member
 
T_Cob's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 125
Received 34 Likes on 24 Posts
2012 E63 AMG PP
Did you ever get your pipes installed? Any pics?
Old 06-22-2019, 01:20 AM
  #5  
Super Member
 
Siegmann's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: FL
Posts: 864
Received 82 Likes on 73 Posts
2013 E550
@try m3

How did this work out?
Old 06-24-2019, 05:00 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
CerBErusM113's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 320
Received 39 Likes on 29 Posts
2015 CLS63 S AMG
I would appreciate an answer as well, as Im doing these on my AWD 14 when I get my new engine mounts installed, any dyno #s also?
Old 06-24-2019, 05:09 PM
  #7  
Member
 
nyc_amg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 58 Likes on 36 Posts
2018 E63S AMG
Originally Posted by try m3
My car is a 2013 rwd so I don't believe I need to drop the engine for install but the awd cars you have to drop the engine.
I dont believe you have to drop the engine to do downpipes.
Old 06-24-2019, 06:26 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Savage212's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 450
Received 98 Likes on 70 Posts
2014 E63 AMG wagon
Originally Posted by nyc_amg
I dont believe you have to drop the engine to do downpipes.
You don't have to drop the engine for "downpipes" on AWD cars.... However you do need to drop the motor for a "bridge pipe" .

There's a short section that comes out of the turbo and turns down by the transmission, the "downpipes" couple up after that on a awd.

Not sure if there is a ton to gain, if the motors out just do turbos!
Old 06-24-2019, 06:41 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
5soko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: NYC
Posts: 469
Received 368 Likes on 157 Posts
AMG
Originally Posted by Savage212
You don't have to drop the engine for "downpipes" on AWD cars.... However you do need to drop the motor for a "bridge pipe" .

There's a short section that comes out of the turbo and turns down by the transmission, the "downpipes" couple up after that on a awd.

Not sure if there is a ton to gain, if the motors out just do turbos!
you are 100% correct, there is absolutely 0 to be gained with these pipes..
Old 06-27-2019, 01:05 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Mikeki7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 369
Received 58 Likes on 53 Posts
CLS63, S55
Originally Posted by 5soko
you are 100% correct, there is absolutely 0 to be gained with these pipes..
But you get that sweet sweet turbo spool sound, worth it just for that. My car is rwd so was much easier to install, though I would agree on awd cars you might as well improve the turbos.
Old 06-28-2019, 08:55 AM
  #11  
Super Member
 
Cifdig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Long Island ny
Posts: 651
Received 458 Likes on 202 Posts
2007 e350 sport. 2010 350 4matic sport. Worlds first W212 E63R self built.
Originally Posted by 5soko
you are 100% correct, there is absolutely 0 to be gained with these pipes..
I’m srry but this is 100% incorrect. I had a dyno done with a stage 1 ec tune. Then gutted my cats dynoed about a week after hitting my cats at picked up almost 23 hp 26tq. Then I got a retune for stage 2. Your egt is lower, your spoil up times is faster. Which me power builds quicker even if it’s only 200rpm quicker
The following users liked this post:
AB550 (08-28-2019)
Old 06-28-2019, 09:06 AM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
5soko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: NYC
Posts: 469
Received 368 Likes on 157 Posts
AMG
Originally Posted by Cifdig
I’m srry but this is 100% incorrect. I had a dyno done with a stage 1 ec tune. Then gutted my cats dynoed about a week after hitting my cats at picked up almost 23 hp 26tq. Then I got a retune for stage 2. Your egt is lower, your spoil up times is faster. Which me power builds quicker even if it’s only 200rpm quicker
I was specifically speaking on the “bridge pipes” that was mentioned by savage.
That bolt to the turbos and to the cat pipes.
These pipes have no restriction, dont change sound, and yield no power gains. As much as some of these companies may try to make you believe. .

Removing the cats.. ill leave that for another discussion... psi for psi if you raced a similar car, i think you may be VERY surprised by the results. Cat flow technology of todays cars has gotten extremely good compared to many myths of years ago.

good article:
https://f87.bimmerpost.com/forums/sh...php?p=24603457

Last edited by 5soko; 06-28-2019 at 09:24 AM.
Old 06-28-2019, 09:07 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
Savage212's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 450
Received 98 Likes on 70 Posts
2014 E63 AMG wagon
Originally Posted by Cifdig
I’m srry but this is 100% incorrect. I had a dyno done with a stage 1 ec tune. Then gutted my cats dynoed about a week after hitting my cats at picked up almost 23 hp 26tq. Then I got a retune for stage 2. Your egt is lower, your spoil up times is faster. Which me power builds quicker even if it’s only 200rpm quicker
The "bridge pipe" and Cattless down pipes are different.
The following users liked this post:
5soko (06-28-2019)
Old 06-28-2019, 11:06 AM
  #14  
Super Member
 
Cifdig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Long Island ny
Posts: 651
Received 458 Likes on 202 Posts
2007 e350 sport. 2010 350 4matic sport. Worlds first W212 E63R self built.
Originally Posted by 5soko
I was specifically speaking on the “bridge pipes” that was mentioned by savage.
That bolt to the turbos and to the cat pipes.
These pipes have no restriction, dont change sound, and yield no power gains. As much as some of these companies may try to make you believe. .

Removing the cats.. ill leave that for another discussion... psi for psi if you raced a similar car, i think you may be VERY surprised by the results. Cat flow technology of todays cars has gotten extremely good compared to many myths of years ago.

good article:
https://f87.bimmerpost.com/forums/sh...php?p=24603457

Srry thought you meant cat less down pipes. Also I’m not into articles. I can find an article that says removing cats shows gains. I’m just speaking from my personal real world experience. And also you can’t compare 2 cars with the exact same mod. They can act entirely different not all cars are identical even the same year make model with matching mod and matching miles. When you remove cats you are creating efficiency , removing heat faster, removing unwanted back pressure. As I agree some back pressure is needed to create a form of exhaust scavenging, but that’s mainly for NA motors where scavenging has a greater affect. I have had many cars. Mod my own vehicles from piston to gearing and diff, except tuning. Also I dyno after every mod on the same dyno same temp within a week from each other . I promise if I lost power removing my cats I would have re installed them without hesitation . Search my post, the last thing I would want to do is miss lead any of my fellow enthusiasts. Maybe Jon doe removed his cats and lost power I’m sure it may happen. But the ratio for gain to loss on much higher then loss to gain on removing cats. Just like everyone who keeps dumping tons of meth with huge nozzles right before the intercooler to show minimal gains. While I mist meth pre turbo with great gain without tuning
The following users liked this post:
Siegmann (06-29-2019)
Old 06-28-2019, 01:03 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
5soko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: NYC
Posts: 469
Received 368 Likes on 157 Posts
AMG
Originally Posted by Cifdig
Srry thought you meant cat less down pipes. Also I’m not into articles. I can find an article that says removing cats shows gains. I’m just speaking from my personal real world experience. And also you can’t compare 2 cars with the exact same mod. They can act entirely different not all cars are identical even the same year make model with matching mod and matching miles. When you remove cats you are creating efficiency , removing heat faster, removing unwanted back pressure. As I agree some back pressure is needed to create a form of exhaust scavenging, but that’s mainly for NA motors where scavenging has a greater affect. I have had many cars. Mod my own vehicles from piston to gearing and diff, except tuning. Also I dyno after every mod on the same dyno same temp within a week from each other . I promise if I lost power removing my cats I would have re installed them without hesitation . Search my post, the last thing I would want to do is miss lead any of my fellow enthusiasts. Maybe Jon doe removed his cats and lost power I’m sure it may happen. But the ratio for gain to loss on much higher then loss to gain on removing cats. Just like everyone who keeps dumping tons of meth with huge nozzles right before the intercooler to show minimal gains. While I mist meth pre turbo with great gain without tuning
I believe all your efforts have been strong and effective, im sure of it..
And by all means i encourage all members to enjoy their cars and mods, that is what we are all here for right.
but i have seen numerous times a diff outcome in real world runs( cat vs catless, then catless vs catless, same cars) backing many of these claims today how well these new cats flow. Just sharing my experience. You can DM me, maybe we can even meet in person and try it out and talk more about this.
Old 06-28-2019, 01:48 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
Savage212's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 450
Received 98 Likes on 70 Posts
2014 E63 AMG wagon
Originally Posted by 5soko
I believe all your efforts have been strong and effective, im sure of it..
And by all means i encourage all members to enjoy their cars and mods, that is what we are all here for right.
but i have seen numerous times a diff outcome in real world runs( cat vs catless, then catless vs catless, same cars) backing many of these claims today how well these new cats flow. Just sharing my experience. You can DM me, maybe we can even meet in person and try it out and talk more about this.
Forget the gains, the sounds and smell of victory is what I am after.

Old 06-28-2019, 01:55 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
Savage212's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 450
Received 98 Likes on 70 Posts
2014 E63 AMG wagon
After reading the article cited here, there are some points of debate. Copied from other Post

" Some facts- Mclaren catbypass pipes will give you a Check Engine light P420/P430 code on these cars. Often you can use simulators to keep the light off BUT its not guaranteed. The car runs 100% fine but you get a small light on the dash. Simulators give you a 50% chance of eliminating a CEL light.

Fabspeed Motorsport has awesome record setting safe tunes for all these McLaren cars for stock, with highflow cats and also No Cats RACE system with no CEL Lights 100% guaranteed. All of our tunes are set up safely for 92 to 93 octane pump fuel.

Point of interest- in virtually all of our testing super highflow German imported Extra large diameter HJS 200 cell Catalytic converters make more absolute power and torque all across the RPM band than catbypass pipes. The HJS Catalytic converters FLOW 93% of a straight pipe and the cars don't go into overboost/ spike and the ECU doesn't try to trim and pull everything back as what happens when you install a catbypass pipes.

Fabspeed Motorsport has tunes for all catted or no cat Mclaren cars. Whats interesting is that the power increase/ difference in ONLY +5HP by going tuned and catless. In our years of back to back dyno testing since 2010 with these cars catbypass pipes/competition pipes and with a tune you get only an additional +5HP more than a Mclaren with HJS German sport race cats with a tune on "same day same weather". "


First, if you do not tune for catless, I'd agree zero or negative gains. Second, what Mclaren owner would do some dumb *** 02 sims? That is a lame way to "correct" the oxygen sensors, any respectable tuner can fix this in the tune. No simulators necessary. After all that it goes on to say there is in fact a gain... however minimal.
Old 06-28-2019, 02:38 PM
  #18  
Super Member
 
Cifdig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Long Island ny
Posts: 651
Received 458 Likes on 202 Posts
2007 e350 sport. 2010 350 4matic sport. Worlds first W212 E63R self built.
Originally Posted by Savage212
After reading the article cited here, there are some points of debate. Copied from other Post

" Some facts- Mclaren catbypass pipes will give you a Check Engine light P420/P430 code on these cars. Often you can use simulators to keep the light off BUT its not guaranteed. The car runs 100% fine but you get a small light on the dash. Simulators give you a 50% chance of eliminating a CEL light.

Fabspeed Motorsport has awesome record setting safe tunes for all these McLaren cars for stock, with highflow cats and also No Cats RACE system with no CEL Lights 100% guaranteed. All of our tunes are set up safely for 92 to 93 octane pump fuel.

Point of interest- in virtually all of our testing super highflow German imported Extra large diameter HJS 200 cell Catalytic converters make more absolute power and torque all across the RPM band than catbypass pipes. The HJS Catalytic converters FLOW 93% of a straight pipe and the cars don't go into overboost/ spike and the ECU doesn't try to trim and pull everything back as what happens when you install a catbypass pipes.

Fabspeed Motorsport has tunes for all catted or no cat Mclaren cars. Whats interesting is that the power increase/ difference in ONLY +5HP by going tuned and catless. In our years of back to back dyno testing since 2010 with these cars catbypass pipes/competition pipes and with a tune you get only an additional +5HP more than a Mclaren with HJS German sport race cats with a tune on "same day same weather". "


First, if you do not tune for catless, I'd agree zero or negative gains. Second, what Mclaren owner would do some dumb *** 02 sims? That is a lame way to "correct" the oxygen sensors, any respectable tuner can fix this in the tune. No simulators necessary. After all that it goes on to say there is in fact a gain... however minimal.

Keep in mind we do not have 200 cell high flow cats as a stock option . Inside our cats there is 2 speperated cells one at the very beginning and small half inch space and another. And that’s per side . So a total of 4 cells. Now I’m assuming we are not talking high flow 200 cell cats because they do flow extremely well. And my statement is based on standard flow cats which is what we have
Old 07-01-2019, 01:27 PM
  #19  
Member
 
Das_it16's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Los Angeles/Vegas
Posts: 148
Received 33 Likes on 29 Posts
2004 E55 AMG
Originally Posted by 5soko
I was specifically speaking on the “bridge pipes” that was mentioned by savage.
That bolt to the turbos and to the cat pipes.
These pipes have no restriction, dont change sound, and yield no power gains. As much as some of these companies may try to make you believe. .

Removing the cats.. ill leave that for another discussion... psi for psi if you raced a similar car, i think you may be VERY surprised by the results. Cat flow technology of todays cars has gotten extremely good compared to many myths of years ago.

good article:
https://f87.bimmerpost.com/forums/sh...php?p=24603457
You're incorrect. There are power gains. How do I know? We actually tested it in person. Here's the video:


CLS63s: Weistec turbo backs
E63s: kept the factory bridge pipes and had MBH catless down pipes
The following 2 users liked this post by Das_it16:
CerBErusM113 (07-01-2019), cls5504matic (09-20-2020)
Old 07-01-2019, 02:02 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
5soko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: NYC
Posts: 469
Received 368 Likes on 157 Posts
AMG
Originally Posted by Das_it16
You're incorrect. There are power gains. How do I know? We actually tested it in person. Here's the video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1s9SrZuwi6s

CLS63s: Weistec turbo backs
E63s: kept the factory bridge pipes and had MBH catless down pipes
Glad you had a different experience and tested it but,
Those bus length difference looks like a 100hp gain tbh....

I did not witness this result in person in my experience.
Might wanna check to make sure that one car is actually tuned,
since your saying a catless bridge pipe with a different bend picked up bus lengths when compared to the oem catless bridge pipe. Lol
The following users liked this post:
AB550 (07-27-2019)
Old 07-01-2019, 02:04 PM
  #21  
Member
 
Das_it16's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Los Angeles/Vegas
Posts: 148
Received 33 Likes on 29 Posts
2004 E55 AMG
Originally Posted by 5soko
Glad you had a different experience and tested it but,
Those bus length difference looks like a 100hp gain tbh....

I did not witness this result in person in my experience.
Might wanna check to make sure that one car is actually tuned,
since your saying a catless bridge pipe with a different bend picked up bus lengths when compared to the oem catless bridge pipe. Lol
Both are tuned by the same tuner and had all the work done by the same shop. We noticed better iats with the CLS63s up top due to the extra flow.
Old 07-01-2019, 09:11 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
5soko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: NYC
Posts: 469
Received 368 Likes on 157 Posts
AMG
Originally Posted by Das_it16
Both are tuned by the same tuner and had all the work done by the same shop. We noticed better iats with the CLS63s up top due to the extra flow.
Not sure if you are associated with the tuner or maybe someone was not clear in one of the races with their mods but NO aftermarket bridge pipes will gain that much power and lengths as shown in the video, i am sorry.
That video is more of a tune vs NON tune video by the huge gap that was put on so quickly. The gap in that race is massive amount of WHP difference.

The oem bridge pipes are actually hydroformed which flow actually very well with no restriction. The oem bridge pipe width is offset by their height, volume is still there in flow because of this. Not sure where this major restriction is coming from to gain so much power, and free so much up you were able to have cooler IAT's? Interesting.

Different experiences i guess. Glad it worked out for you.

Last edited by 5soko; 07-01-2019 at 09:20 PM.
Old 07-01-2019, 10:40 PM
  #23  
Member
 
Das_it16's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Los Angeles/Vegas
Posts: 148
Received 33 Likes on 29 Posts
2004 E55 AMG
Originally Posted by 5soko
Not sure if you are associated with the tuner or maybe someone was not clear in one of the races with their mods but NO aftermarket bridge pipes will gain that much power and lengths as shown in the video, i am sorry.
That video is more of a tune vs NON tune video by the huge gap that was put on so quickly. The gap in that race is massive amount of WHP difference.

The oem bridge pipes are actually hydroformed which flow actually very well with no restriction. The oem bridge pipe width is offset by their height, volume is still there in flow because of this. Not sure where this major restriction is coming from to gain so much power, and free so much up you were able to have cooler IAT's? Interesting.

Different experiences i guess. Glad it worked out for you.
Both of them are very close friends of mine. I helped them pick out their mods, where to order, where to go for install and the tunes themselves. My friend with the E63s didn’t want to drop the motor to fit the turbo backs and wanted a more simple route so we found a set of MBH down pipes and a stage 2 tune for 91 pump gas. We don’t have 93 out here in Vegas. Before the down pipes he started with a stage 1 tune only and we hit our local track LVMS. DA was 4500 and it did a 11.8 at 120mph. He spun ever pass since the track can get dusty from the desert winds out here and no track prep aka glue didn’t help either. He was on 20s as well.

Now my friend that owns the CLS63s didn’t care what it takes he just wanted the most gains. He started with a stage 1 tune as well. Went to the track and had a similar time as the E63s except he had a better 60ft and got 11.7 at 119mph but the DA was higher at 5000. After that we went with the Weistec turbo backs and the stage 2 tune on 91 pump gas. Both with the same amount of timing and boost. Both are tuned by Anthony Lawshee aka Tony from Race IQ Performance. I saw them both get flashed at our local Race IQ dealer called Silver Arrows Motors in Las Vegas.

This is what we experienced out here with these mods.


Here’s both them in front of the shop.




Oem motor mount on the left Weistec billet engine mounts to fit the turbo backs

Stock vs turbo back

Last edited by Das_it16; 07-02-2019 at 01:13 PM.
The following users liked this post:
timm206 (07-02-2019)
Old 07-01-2019, 11:07 PM
  #24  
Member
 
Das_it16's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Los Angeles/Vegas
Posts: 148
Received 33 Likes on 29 Posts
2004 E55 AMG

The MBH down pipes on the 2015 E63s

Last edited by Das_it16; 07-01-2019 at 11:44 PM.
Old 07-02-2019, 12:04 AM
  #25  
Former Vendor of MBWorld
 
MBH motorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Valley of the Sun, Arizona
Posts: 2,305
Received 90 Likes on 45 Posts
C63, SL55, E55, CLS55, ML63, C55
I think the "bridge pipe" makes some power. However it also comes in at a higher price. Our downpipes are at the $1500-1700 price point pending sales discounts. We could very easily make a "bridge pipe" But that would include machining cost , and more build labor. Inturn making our downpipes cost more. We wanted to keep this simple, Our downpipes only take 20 minutes to install and if you want to reinstall your OEM system that only take about 20 min as well. This will save a person many hours of install time ($$$) Weistec makes nice stuff, but we believe we doo as well. Our construction is 16 gauge 304 stainless, Id imagine the same as our friends over at Weistec use. We just dont to the bridge pipe, but if someone wanted it we would make it for them.
To be fair, that weistec engine with the red pipe from weistec is the there water methanol injection setup. That on a car is worth a bunch of power.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Turbo Back Downpipe Install



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:06 AM.