E63 AMG 2014 bumpy suspension
Thank you.
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
i hear you though about the choppiness; switching to conti dws with 40psi helped a lot
Thank you.
Last edited by Rehabguy; Jul 29, 2018 at 09:27 PM. Reason: spelling
what year GT-R? As flawed as the E63’s suspension and MCT are, my ‘09 GT-R was that much worse. The DCT was clunky and loud, but got better with the Cobb LC4 updates... but still made the MCT look smooth in comparison. I purposely had to plan out my routes to avoid bone jarring rough roads. That never crossed my mind in th E63.
2010. Maybe I should have clarified, for the most part we have pretty good roads so it’s not the bone jarring potholes I’m talking about. It’s the small sharp road imperfections that the E63 is absolutely horrible over. No luxury car should transmit that much harshness through it’s suspension. And this is a luxury car above the power and handling attributes AMG tried to build in.

I've always felt this about mine too.
i contend that the E63 was and is and will never be designed to deliver a luxurious ride
its a 4500lb go cart with a nice stereo and massage seating
It feels great on a smooth strip of blacktop, but anything else is just too stiff. Way too busy, transition impacts are an adventure.
In my mind the problem is those cheap Monroe shocks. Come on DBAG, I know they're probably AMG spec, but for a car that costs around $100k, you couldn't put Bilsteins on it? Would have improved it immensely.
Anyway, --again--you are not alone. If someone knows a more "compliant" solution, let me know. I'm only going to keep my car a few more months, but I'd still do it...
All my M3's, even the E46, had far superior ride quality to this. So did my S5 (coupe and convertible) and RS5. Both have shorter wheelbases than the 212. Forget about m5, (E34, 39, 60 and F10, I've had them all)--they all rode far superior to this.
The point is that MB chassis engineers still seem to have a hard time realizing what roads in the USA are like.
Last edited by allenjdmb; Jul 30, 2018 at 02:46 PM.
What the other cars have that this one, and most other performance oriented MB's don't have-- COMPLIANCE in the entire suspension setup. This is where BMW and Audi excel, even if you install springs, etc. The problem is that I don't know of a strut/shock absorber manufacturer that makes a replacement for the OE Monroes. That's just saving a dollar on MB's part.
It feels great on a smooth strip of blacktop, but anything else is just too stiff. Way too busy, transition impacts are an adventure.
In my mind the problem is those cheap Monroe shocks. Come on DBAG, I know they're probably AMG spec, but for a car that costs around $100k, you couldn't put Bilsteins on it? Would have improved it immensely.
Anyway, --again--you are not alone. If someone knows a more "compliant" solution, let me know. I'm only going to keep my car a few more months, but I'd still do it...
It is funny. I felt the same way about the suspension characteristics of my old ‘05 CL65. The E63 has slightly better suspension dampening than the CL65 and its ABC hydraulic system. The only thing that set up did well was deter body roll for such a heavy car (4,600+lbs). But maybe Mercedes/AMG said ‘we can’t figure out how to get it right with an expensive/complicated system...let’s just save money and get essentially the same result’...








