RENNtech Bad Ass Tune Video- 10.88 quarter mile/0-60 in 2.79




This is because your shop didnt put in in dyno mode (as I had mentioned)... you cant dyno a benz correctly if its not in that mode thus these errors. Your dyno operator should know this though- I showed this to Serge and he mirrored my thoughts.




you should really reach out the Serge as there is something your guy missed... but whatever if you like the tune who cares right?




Did W212's with tunes trap 130? stage 1 no other mods?? i think its safe to say that the 9 speed MCT delivers a more efficient power delivery to the ground as evidenced but the stock trap speeds.
Last edited by Vic55; Dec 6, 2017 at 10:23 PM.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Seems like the larger displacement of the w212 is better for torque while the twin scrolls of the W213 is making a decent bit more HP
Did W212's with tunes trap 130? stage 1 no other mods?? i think its safe to say that the 9 speed MCT delivers a more efficient power delivery to the ground as evidenced but the stock trap speeds.
Now they can still hit that trap but they need DPs and a good launch to get there....




Ill say this, I echo your thoughts on the tune; its definitely a faster car from a dig and roll. Im getting wheelspin and that just shouldnt happen (more than I did when stock of course).
ENGINE TYPE: twin-turbocharged and intercooled DOHC 32-valve V-8, aluminum block and heads, direct fuel injection
DISPLACEMENT: 268 cu in, 4395 cc
POWER: 600 hp @ 6600 rpm
TORQUE: 553 lb-ft @ 1800 rpm
TRANSMISSION: 8-speed automatic with manual shifting mode
DIMENSIONS:
WHEELBASE: 117.4 in
LENGTH: 195.5 in
WIDTH: 74.9 in HEIGHT: 58.0 in
PASSENGER VOLUME: 102 cu ft
TRUNK VOLUME: 19 cu ft
CURB WEIGHT: 4288 lb
C/D TEST RESULTS:
Zero to 60 mph: 2.8 sec
Zero to 100 mph: 6.6 sec
Zero to 130 mph: 11.1 sec
Zero to 150 mph: 15.9 sec
Rolling start, 5-60 mph: 3.7 sec
Top gear, 30-50 mph: 2.2 sec
Top gear, 50-70 mph: 2.4 sec
Standing ¼-mile: 10.9 sec @ 129 mph




Here are the C&D numbers for E63S- closest thing to apples and apples- mostly off by two tenths in most measurements. That curb weight hurts (4288 vs 4587).
C/D TEST RESULTS:
Zero to 60 mph: 3.0 sec
Zero to 100 mph: 7.0 sec
Zero to 130 mph: 11.9 sec
Zero to 150 mph: 16.6 sec
Zero to 170 mph: 23.3 sec
Rolling start, 5-60 mph: 3.9 sec
Top gear, 30-50 mph: 2.3 sec
Top gear, 50-70 mph: 2.7 sec
Standing ¼-mile: 11.1 sec @ 126 mph
Top speed (governor limited, mfr's claim): 186 mph
Braking, 70-0 mph: 155 ft
Roadholding, 300-ft-dia skidpad: 1.01 g
Last edited by Vic55; Feb 14, 2018 at 11:44 AM.
I'm driving an AMG not a soon to crap out BMW.




ENGINE TYPE: twin-turbocharged and intercooled DOHC 32-valve V-8, aluminum block and heads, direct fuel injection
DISPLACEMENT: 268 cu in, 4395 cc
POWER: 600 hp @ 6600 rpm
TORQUE: 553 lb-ft @ 1800 rpm
TRANSMISSION: 8-speed automatic with manual shifting mode
DIMENSIONS:
WHEELBASE: 117.4 in
LENGTH: 195.5 in
WIDTH: 74.9 in HEIGHT: 58.0 in
PASSENGER VOLUME: 102 cu ft
TRUNK VOLUME: 19 cu ft
CURB WEIGHT: 4288 lb
C/D TEST RESULTS:
Zero to 60 mph: 2.8 sec
Zero to 100 mph: 6.6 sec
Zero to 130 mph: 11.1 sec
Zero to 150 mph: 15.9 sec
Rolling start, 5-60 mph: 3.7 sec
Top gear, 30-50 mph: 2.2 sec
Top gear, 50-70 mph: 2.4 sec
Standing ¼-mile: 10.9 sec @ 129 mph
But at this point I'm not in the market and happy with my new purchase and I'm at least a few years away from an upgrade.
By then Mercedes will probably have a hybrid out which will kick A on current hardware.







