Continental Extreme Contact DWS VS. Pirelli P-Zero Nero A/S
In a previous thread, I asked if you recommended the new Continental Extreme Contact DWS for my 2005 SL600. You stated, that for my car, I should not get that tire, but rather the Pirelli P-Zero Nero A/S.
My question, is why? What makes the Conti not a good choice? The reason I ask, is that its a bit cheaper and a newer design than the P-Zero. My original Michelin Pilot Sports with 16K miles on them are starting to drive me bonkers with the amount of roar they're producing. I'm looking for a non-directional, mega high performance all-season tire that is quiet, comfortable and able to keep 500hp and 600 lb-ft of torque planted to the road for occasional 150mph + runs.
My guess is that this tire does not exist for all of my requirements, but I'd sure like to get as many of them as possible.
The Contis got a lot of attention at the MB dealer who installed them. They had never seen them before and seemed very interested by the tread pattern. Looks pretty cool.

hahah!!I got them for my E. So far I like them very much. Quiet and the wet grip is great. Dry grip kinda blows. I can't launch it for sh*t now. It's an ok trade off. I don't drive the car as hard as I should.
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG

Or more likely, it's because I'm a rockstar in these parts. The men want to be me and women want to be with me. It's the burden I bear, but I've gotten used to it.
Or more likely, it's because I'm a rockstar in these parts. The men want to be me and women want to be with me. It's the burden I bear, but I've gotten used to it.
You gonna sell me the E when you are ready?








