**The Official 60-130 Thread MBWorld Edition**
07-20-2010, 10:52 AM
#151
MBWorld Fanatic!
I've been out of the country on vacation for a couple weeks, I will try to post up V Box data shortly. I actually have not done a proper run, I was gettting my car up to 60 then punching it, I did not think I was allowed to go from like 20-130 then just track the 60-130 portion of the data, doing it that way it makes a HUGE difference in time.
Tom
09-05-2010, 10:34 AM
#156
MBWorld Fanatic!
Nope 8.6" crank pulley (pretty tame), CAI, Z06 ported TB, Kooks headers with H/F cats (to stock mufflers), tune and aux. H/E. My car is pretty mildly tuned and puts down 552rwhp. For comparison, I believe Hennessey's V700 CTS-V ran a 7.72s 60-130mph, but his car has cams and heads and he does a S/C pulley swap instead of the crank, which produces another 1lb of boost compared to my crank pulley. He makes about 630+rwhp with the V700 set-up.
Tom
Tom
09-05-2010, 12:43 PM
#157
MBWorld Fanatic!
Nope 8.6" crank pulley (pretty tame), CAI, Z06 ported TB, Kooks headers with H/F cats (to stock mufflers), tune and aux. H/E. My car is pretty mildly tuned and puts down 552rwhp. For comparison, I believe Hennessey's V700 CTS-V ran a 7.72s 60-130mph, but his car has cams and heads and he does a S/C pulley swap instead of the crank, which produces another 1lb of boost compared to my crank pulley. He makes about 630+rwhp with the V700 set-up.
Tom
Tom
that's fast. Nice set up u got
09-05-2010, 08:00 PM
#158
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Southern, CA.
Posts: 9,155
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes
on
17 Posts
V12-Biturbo
ran 6.9x 60-130 V-BOX MY AZZZZZZZZZYet ran door to dor w/me up to 100 mph then passed me by up to 4 lengths (I was on street 19"s 295/30 no cool dwn 1.5 hr drive str8 to race spot & bad 91 oct mix + NO tcu tune)
Warren posted vidz that look'd special effects enhanced (as he swore he didn't spray until 3rd gear, the speedo flew like friggn' fan blade from dig to 130+
I knew he had a 10-12 lb NOS bottle during races, we ran maybe 5 times & he was complaing about being on EMPTY last couple runs, hmmm I don't kno nitrous very well but a 10-12lb bottle running out in 3-4 runs on 60HP shot
Warren I call
you're a FLAT LYING WEASLE!!!! I had figured you needed @ least 100-150 shot to run that fast NOW we know 110% you were running 150+ shot if INDEED Peter Jackson didn't CGI your 60-130 vidz
Here's C63 Dyno on/off Nitrous... No wonder your trans popped you were prolly turning 650+ rwp...
What I don't get? Why do you 335 guys (nearly 95% of the 1's I've ran/met) lie like a RUG about mods WTF!
Well, nothing exciting to report. It seems as though we have achieved the limits of the stock tranny. The juice works but the tranny will not shift in auto sport mode. We even backed out the nitrous to end at 6900 and it still would not shift. However, it works fine in manual mode. However, I suck at driving in manual mode. 
We only got four runs in and I can't drive in manual. I made one pass that was fairly clean and Ben got one run that was fairly clean. Here's the real kicker. My pass was 11.533 @ 128.11mpg and Ben's run was 11.533 @ 128.64mph. Yes, I said it. Both runs were EXACTLY the same times.
Mine - 60' was 1.838
1/8 mile - 7.636 @ 98.15mph
Ben's - 60' was 1.862
1/8 mile - 7.658 @ 98.88mph
Strangely similar.
The fourth and final pass we brought the nitrous in in first gear. That was a kick in the pants and it launched like a rocket with NO traction issues. However, it banged the limiter in every gear.
Its late and we'll get it ironed out.
We did have an issue with the nitrous I'll ask the nitrous guru's to answer. Every time we purged the nitrous we got a lot of air. Even back to back purges gave us a good bit of air. During all the runs it seemed like the nitrous was coming in and out but we can't prove that other than the seat of the pants feel. Suggestions on what the problem could have been?? Both bottles were freshly filled and had 1000psi on them at all times.
We only got four runs in and I can't drive in manual. I made one pass that was fairly clean and Ben got one run that was fairly clean. Here's the real kicker. My pass was 11.533 @ 128.11mpg and Ben's run was 11.533 @ 128.64mph. Yes, I said it. Both runs were EXACTLY the same times.
Mine - 60' was 1.838
1/8 mile - 7.636 @ 98.15mph
Ben's - 60' was 1.862
1/8 mile - 7.658 @ 98.88mph
Strangely similar.
The fourth and final pass we brought the nitrous in in first gear. That was a kick in the pants and it launched like a rocket with NO traction issues. However, it banged the limiter in every gear.
Its late and we'll get it ironed out.
We did have an issue with the nitrous I'll ask the nitrous guru's to answer. Every time we purged the nitrous we got a lot of air. Even back to back purges gave us a good bit of air. During all the runs it seemed like the nitrous was coming in and out but we can't prove that other than the seat of the pants feel. Suggestions on what the problem could have been?? Both bottles were freshly filled and had 1000psi on them at all times.
ALL this On 125HP shot NOT 60 HP Warren
.__________________
Owner/part time driver of a 2009 C63 - Complete MHP Package
1/4 mile - 11.24 @ 124.32mph, (highest MPH is 125.38)
60-130mph - 8.46 (V-Box verified)
60-130mph - 7.29 with the 125 NOS!! (V-box verified)
One Mile TopGunRun in Miami March 14th 2010 - 180.73mph (V-Box verified)
Owner/part time driver of a 2009 C63 - Complete MHP Package
1/4 mile - 11.24 @ 124.32mph, (highest MPH is 125.38)
60-130mph - 8.46 (V-Box verified)
60-130mph - 7.29 with the 125 NOS!! (V-box verified)
One Mile TopGunRun in Miami March 14th 2010 - 180.73mph (V-Box verified)
Okay, so a lot has happened in the last few months. I got my 60-130 down to 9.09 seconds with a different map I down loaded. JB3 version 2.0. I also installed a small .28 dry shot system yesterday morning and went straight to the drag strip. 11.33 at 132.77 mph!
My 60-130 times so far is 7.9 seconds. That will improve once I get a little tuning done. I'm predicting 7.7 seconds or lower.
My 60-130 times so far is 7.9 seconds. That will improve once I get a little tuning done. I'm predicting 7.7 seconds or lower.
You should beat my 3.0L I think. The small dry shot is only good for about 60Hp according to the dyno on Brians 135i. I bought the system from him for $100, LOL. I would be interested to see how you would do at the track or what 60-130mph times your beast will run. The 60-130 takes the start and traction problems out of the equation for the most part.
Come on now... You ran 11.3x @ nearly 133mph that trap is showing some serious power bud, I'll be running @ Famoso soon enough. So you're telling me you think my SL can top a 133mph trap
You can run all the nitrous you can carry, all I need is 93+ octane, what's the harm in some roll-ons I'll run you w/my 19" street setup vs your drag 17"s in your 1/4 mi spot then we hit the frwy I'm really not into the vbox stuf
You can run all the nitrous you can carry, all I need is 93+ octane, what's the harm in some roll-ons
I'll run you w/my 19" street setup vs your drag 17"s in your 1/4 mi spot then we hit the frwy I'm really not into the vbox stufHey sean, the car is even running faster now. I have no doubt I could go down to Sac and trap 135mph now.
I just did my 60-130 mph run on a nice level stretch..
6.9 seconds!!
Check out the video I made also. I am babying the throttle up to 60 mph. How do you like the 100-130 mph acceleration??
Just curious, what is your opinion of how your car's speedo compares to the video?And this is on low boost 12-13psi, and a small .28 jet !
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2cfEpbx4nc
1987 Grand National
2005 M3 Conv (sold)
2006 M3 SMG Coupe (sold)
2007 335i Sedan 11.991 @ 117.524 (sold)
2008 335i Coupe 11.33 @ 132.77mph (6.9 sec 60-130mph)
2008 335i Sedan 12.10 @ 118.7 mph
I just did my 60-130 mph run on a nice level stretch..
6.9 seconds!!
Check out the video I made also. I am babying the throttle up to 60 mph. How do you like the 100-130 mph acceleration??
Just curious, what is your opinion of how your car's speedo compares to the video?And this is on low boost 12-13psi, and a small .28 jet !
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2cfEpbx4nc
1987 Grand National
2005 M3 Conv (sold)
2006 M3 SMG Coupe (sold)
2007 335i Sedan 11.991 @ 117.524 (sold)
2008 335i Coupe 11.33 @ 132.77mph (6.9 sec 60-130mph)
2008 335i Sedan 12.10 @ 118.7 mph
So you expect ALL the fools
here to believe your supposed 12-13 PSI 
60HP .28 SHOT is running 7-9 mph FASTER & nearly 4 tenths faster thru 60-130 V-BOX "Hey Warren SHUTTHEFUKUPKLOWN"Lastly I know FULL WELL you sprayed thru 1st gear on up, NO WAY in hell could your 335i w/bolt-ons ONLY KEEP up w/me from 40mph to where you supposedly swore you started spraying ONLY @ 60+mph. I saw you loose control & nearly flip/hit Drews SC'd M3 from 50-up roll, your lies are LAME..
I've run multiple 335i J3 full bolt-ons BEFORE my TUNE & beat them handily, after ECU the other 335's were left like they were in PARK...
Last edited by Thericker; 09-06-2010 at 04:24 AM.
09-05-2010, 09:13 PM
#159
MBWorld Fanatic!
My one and only comment will be that nitrous with a turbocharged engine will gain more power from the same shot than an N/A engine.... but not sure that explains the difference in performance...but could explain some of the difference.
Tom
09-05-2010, 09:37 PM
#160
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Southern, CA.
Posts: 9,155
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes
on
17 Posts
V12-Biturbo
Originally Posted by hotrod182
You should beat my 3.0L I think. The small dry shot is only good for about 60Hp according to the dyno on Brians 135i. I bought the system from him for $100, LOL. I would be interested to see how you would do at the track or what 60-130mph times your beast will run. The 60-130 takes the start and traction problems out of the equation for the most part.
You should beat my 3.0L I think. The small dry shot is only good for about 60Hp according to the dyno on Brians 135i. I bought the system from him for $100, LOL. I would be interested to see how you would do at the track or what 60-130mph times your beast will run. The 60-130 takes the start and traction problems out of the equation for the most part.
Edit: I can't find Warrens Nitrous Dyno sheets, though he told me to my face (Drew w/SC'd M3 heard this too, was standing w/us as Warren told us) his Nitrous/Meth J3 etc Dyno's @ 540-550 rwhp, obvious PURE
(he told me after he ran the 6.9 60-130 on Vbox after testing w/fuller bottle or some concoction he either did run Vbox 1/4 & trapped 137mph or was convinced he could @ Sacramento honestly can't remember ALL his BS stories)
Curb weight/7 speed Gearing/Both are Automatics/Doesn't add up to ANY performance edge on 335i vs Dads C63 w/622 rwhp, let alone 7-9mph FASTER down the 1/4 mile & 4 tenths FASTER 60-130.... Really love the ONLY 2-Shifts addition
6.95 - hotrod182 / 335i AT w/ JB3 piggyback ECU / .28 Nitrous Dry shot / Race Gas / Water Meth/ Weight Reduction / 2-shifts
Hotrod's been spreading his BS like a $10 hoars thighs all over this bloody Internet, it's on 30-40 sites (Just a guess after googling "Hotrod 335i Nitrous J3 etc"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nsQJgvGDdqY
(This Post from Youtube, sums up Hotrod to a "T")
jhoe1upGuy
4 months ago
Funny how after all the perfectly staged races between tuned 335i's and normally much faster cars (to show the effectiveness of tuning on 335i's) finally backfires, and all the cocky bummer fanboys vagina's are bleeding. Serves bmw guy's right for never being modest. You play with fire your gonna get burned. C5 Z06's are fast as hell and if you think a jb3 only 335i on pump gas is gonna walk a stock C5Z06 your going to be very humbled on your race day with one.
4 months ago
@hotrod182 With a 117.5mph trap YOU will walk most of them. But that is with race gas and Drag radials. Do you run race gas/DR's all day every day? This guy is an everyday joe and probably doesn't care to run $7-8 a gallon race gas all day every day just for that rare one time race with a STOCK C5Z06. Stop giving your customers false hopes. Now meth injection is a different story.
Last edited by Thericker; 09-06-2010 at 12:24 AM.
09-06-2010, 08:24 AM
#161
Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
335i
I hear that, but chk HIS post above he claims Dyno PROOF from another member who sold him the .28 60 HP shot...Also in Dragtimes link below you'll see Hotrod's race-weight w/17" Hoosiers is 3500lbs what does Dads C63's curb weight come in @ (I'll guess VERY close)
I've also seen his dyno's on the 335i forums after said mods...I'll dig'em up later
Edit: I can't find Warrens Nitrous Dyno sheets, though he told me to my face (Drew w/SC'd M3 heard this too, was standing w/us as Warren told us) his Nitrous/Meth J3 etc Dyno's @ 540-550 rwhp, obvious PURE
(he told me after he ran the 6.9 60-130 on Vbox after testing w/fuller bottle or some concoction he either did run Vbox 1/4 & trapped 137mph or was convinced he could @ Sacramento honestly can't remember ALL his BS stories)
Curb weight/7 speed Gearing/Both are Automatics/Doesn't add up to ANY performance edge on 335i vs Dads C63 w/622 rwhp, let alone 7-9mph FASTER down the 1/4 mile & 4 tenths FASTER 60-130.... Really love the ONLY 2-Shifts addition
https://www.dragtimes.com/BMW-335i-Timeslip-20520.html
Hotrod's been spreading his BS like a $10 hoars thighs all over this bloody Internet, it's on 30-40 sites (Just a guess after googling "Hotrod 335i Nitrous J3 etc"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nsQJgvGDdqY
(This Post from Youtube, sums up Hotrod to a "T")
jhoe1upGuy
4 months ago
Funny how after all the perfectly staged races between tuned 335i's and normally much faster cars (to show the effectiveness of tuning on 335i's) finally backfires, and all the cocky bummer fanboys vagina's are bleeding. Serves bmw guy's right for never being modest. You play with fire your gonna get burned. C5 Z06's are fast as hell and if you think a jb3 only 335i on pump gas is gonna walk a stock C5Z06 your going to be very humbled on your race day with one.
4 months ago
@hotrod182 With a 117.5mph trap YOU will walk most of them. But that is with race gas and Drag radials. Do you run race gas/DR's all day every day? This guy is an everyday joe and probably doesn't care to run $7-8 a gallon race gas all day every day just for that rare one time race with a STOCK C5Z06. Stop giving your customers false hopes. Now meth injection is a different story.
I've also seen his dyno's on the 335i forums after said mods...I'll dig'em up later
Edit: I can't find Warrens Nitrous Dyno sheets, though he told me to my face (Drew w/SC'd M3 heard this too, was standing w/us as Warren told us) his Nitrous/Meth J3 etc Dyno's @ 540-550 rwhp, obvious PURE
(he told me after he ran the 6.9 60-130 on Vbox after testing w/fuller bottle or some concoction he either did run Vbox 1/4 & trapped 137mph or was convinced he could @ Sacramento honestly can't remember ALL his BS stories)
Curb weight/7 speed Gearing/Both are Automatics/Doesn't add up to ANY performance edge on 335i vs Dads C63 w/622 rwhp, let alone 7-9mph FASTER down the 1/4 mile & 4 tenths FASTER 60-130.... Really love the ONLY 2-Shifts addition
https://www.dragtimes.com/BMW-335i-Timeslip-20520.html
Hotrod's been spreading his BS like a $10 hoars thighs all over this bloody Internet, it's on 30-40 sites (Just a guess after googling "Hotrod 335i Nitrous J3 etc"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nsQJgvGDdqY
(This Post from Youtube, sums up Hotrod to a "T")
jhoe1upGuy
4 months ago
Funny how after all the perfectly staged races between tuned 335i's and normally much faster cars (to show the effectiveness of tuning on 335i's) finally backfires, and all the cocky bummer fanboys vagina's are bleeding. Serves bmw guy's right for never being modest. You play with fire your gonna get burned. C5 Z06's are fast as hell and if you think a jb3 only 335i on pump gas is gonna walk a stock C5Z06 your going to be very humbled on your race day with one.
4 months ago
@hotrod182 With a 117.5mph trap YOU will walk most of them. But that is with race gas and Drag radials. Do you run race gas/DR's all day every day? This guy is an everyday joe and probably doesn't care to run $7-8 a gallon race gas all day every day just for that rare one time race with a STOCK C5Z06. Stop giving your customers false hopes. Now meth injection is a different story.
As far as the nitrous jet sizes, etc, I just took a look at my kit a few weeks ago, took a picture of the jets, etc. See the link:
http://www.n54tech.com/forums/showpo...&postcount=169
So, the jets clearly say .024, and .028. I only ran the .028. So on the smaller size of what most people run.
Also, at couple months ago I ran a test on the sedan (at 7400 miles), with only tune, air filter, Nitto DRs, and the Agoura 76 100 oct pump gas.The results were pretty much in the neighborhood of what many E55 or CTS-V run stock. 12.1 at 118.7mph:
http://www.n54tech.com/forums/showpo...6&postcount=49
So engine mods were just TUNE and Air Filters. When I hook up the meth, I will be able to run 91 octane and have even better performance, as the 130F intake temps will go down about 40F degrees.
Finally got my fuel pump resolved, so I will be modding the sedan fairly quickly. You and I should be able to get some runs together on video in short order. In the meanwhile, Drew runs an almost identical 60-130. I think he got 7.05 seconds? I know he has been up to run you, but I'm not sure whatever happened. Last time we talked, I thought you exchanged text messages, etc.
Also, there are no hidden mods on my car. Remember, I installed that basic nitrous kit for the first time, and ran at the track the same morning. No special tuning. No AFR, EGT gauges. No bottle warmer, nitrous controller etc. Never ran nitrous before in my life before that morning. The few runs I did at 2am in the morning before heading to Sacramento definitely lowered my bottler pressure. I thought we already went over this. My 60-130 and traps at Sacramento were definitely a good 3MPH slower than what I would have achieved with a full bottle. I could post the VBox results as I have the graphs and Vbox readouts from Sacramento, and testing a few days later. Actually I already posted the information if you look for it. According to my test results, with a full bottle, my trap speed at Sacramento should have been 135.7 mph. I was 3mph off my peak performance numbers.
I know nothing about nitrous. Certainly wouldn't be running a 150 shot the first day out with no tuning or experience. Thats why I posted a picture of the jets. They look to be factory stock to me. Perhaps the guy the sold them to me drilled them out? But why? Look at the pictures, you be the judge.
And lastly, why don't you come down and get some 60-130 times on your SL soon? You can do roll races all day long and get different results on different runs. Just look at the video king Drew's results. Best to instrument you car and see what it is actually capable of!
Last edited by hotrod182; 09-06-2010 at 08:33 AM.
09-06-2010, 04:53 PM
#162
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Southern, CA.
Posts: 9,155
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes
on
17 Posts
V12-Biturbo
Hey Sean, long time no talk. How is your car running? Again, not sure if you are confusing me with someone else, but I have never dynoed my car. Never said I could trap 137mph either. I am an avid user of the Vbox, and actually seeing how it performs in real life conditions.
As far as the nitrous jet sizes, etc, I just took a look at my kit a few weeks ago, took a picture of the jets, etc. See the link:
http://www.n54tech.com/forums/showpo...&postcount=169
So, the jets clearly say .024, and .028. I only ran the .028. So on the smaller size of what most people run.
Also, at couple months ago I ran a test on the sedan (at 7400 miles), with only tune, air filter, Nitto DRs, and the Agoura 76 100 oct pump gas.The results were pretty much in the neighborhood of what many E55 or CTS-V run stock. 12.1 at 118.7mph:
http://www.n54tech.com/forums/showpo...6&postcount=49
So engine mods were just TUNE and Air Filters. When I hook up the meth, I will be able to run 91 octane and have even better performance, as the 130F intake temps will go down about 40F degrees.
Finally got my fuel pump resolved, so I will be modding the sedan fairly quickly. You and I should be able to get some runs together on video in short order. In the meanwhile, Drew runs an almost identical 60-130. I think he got 7.05 seconds? I know he has been up to run you, but I'm not sure whatever happened. Last time we talked, I thought you exchanged text messages, etc.
Also, there are no hidden mods on my car. Remember, I installed that basic nitrous kit for the first time, and ran at the track the same morning. No special tuning. No AFR, EGT gauges. No bottle warmer, nitrous controller etc. Never ran nitrous before in my life before that morning. The few runs I did at 2am in the morning before heading to Sacramento definitely lowered my bottler pressure. I thought we already went over this. My 60-130 and traps at Sacramento were definitely a good 3MPH slower than what I would have achieved with a full bottle. I could post the VBox results as I have the graphs and Vbox readouts from Sacramento, and testing a few days later. Actually I already posted the information if you look for it. According to my test results, with a full bottle, my trap speed at Sacramento should have been 135.7 mph. I was 3mph off my peak performance numbers.
I know nothing about nitrous. Certainly wouldn't be running a 150 shot the first day out with no tuning or experience. Thats why I posted a picture of the jets. They look to be factory stock to me. Perhaps the guy the sold them to me drilled them out? But why? Look at the pictures, you be the judge.
And lastly, why don't you come down and get some 60-130 times on your SL soon? You can do roll races all day long and get different results on different runs. Just look at the video king Drew's results. Best to instrument you car and see what it is actually capable of!
As far as the nitrous jet sizes, etc, I just took a look at my kit a few weeks ago, took a picture of the jets, etc. See the link:
http://www.n54tech.com/forums/showpo...&postcount=169
So, the jets clearly say .024, and .028. I only ran the .028. So on the smaller size of what most people run.
Also, at couple months ago I ran a test on the sedan (at 7400 miles), with only tune, air filter, Nitto DRs, and the Agoura 76 100 oct pump gas.The results were pretty much in the neighborhood of what many E55 or CTS-V run stock. 12.1 at 118.7mph:
http://www.n54tech.com/forums/showpo...6&postcount=49
So engine mods were just TUNE and Air Filters. When I hook up the meth, I will be able to run 91 octane and have even better performance, as the 130F intake temps will go down about 40F degrees.
Finally got my fuel pump resolved, so I will be modding the sedan fairly quickly. You and I should be able to get some runs together on video in short order. In the meanwhile, Drew runs an almost identical 60-130. I think he got 7.05 seconds? I know he has been up to run you, but I'm not sure whatever happened. Last time we talked, I thought you exchanged text messages, etc.
Also, there are no hidden mods on my car. Remember, I installed that basic nitrous kit for the first time, and ran at the track the same morning. No special tuning. No AFR, EGT gauges. No bottle warmer, nitrous controller etc. Never ran nitrous before in my life before that morning. The few runs I did at 2am in the morning before heading to Sacramento definitely lowered my bottler pressure. I thought we already went over this. My 60-130 and traps at Sacramento were definitely a good 3MPH slower than what I would have achieved with a full bottle. I could post the VBox results as I have the graphs and Vbox readouts from Sacramento, and testing a few days later. Actually I already posted the information if you look for it. According to my test results, with a full bottle, my trap speed at Sacramento should have been 135.7 mph. I was 3mph off my peak performance numbers.
I know nothing about nitrous. Certainly wouldn't be running a 150 shot the first day out with no tuning or experience. Thats why I posted a picture of the jets. They look to be factory stock to me. Perhaps the guy the sold them to me drilled them out? But why? Look at the pictures, you be the judge.
And lastly, why don't you come down and get some 60-130 times on your SL soon? You can do roll races all day long and get different results on different runs. Just look at the video king Drew's results. Best to instrument you car and see what it is actually capable of!
C63 makes 622 rwhp, you TOLD DREW & I you made 540-550 rwhp @ the time you had the Nitrous hooked up.. Yet you run 7-9mph faster in 1/4 + 4 tenths faster 60-130 it Doesn't add up to ONLY 60 HP difference.
(Think about what you're trying to sell us here??? a lightly modded 335i w/minor bolt-ons J3 race gas STOCK TURBO's/STOCK INTERCOOLER/Meth injection & BABY .28 60 HP SHOT which you wrote you saw the dyno perf from...
Originally Posted by hotrod182
The small dry shot is only good for about 60Hp according to the dyno on Brians 135i. I bought the system from him for $100, LOL.
The small dry shot is only good for about 60Hp according to the dyno on Brians 135i. I bought the system from him for $100, LOL.
Originally Posted by hotrod182
I have no doubt I could go down to Sac and trap 135mph now. I just did my 60-130 mph run on a nice level stretch..
6.9 seconds!!
I am babying the throttle up to 60 mph. And this is on low boost 12-13psi, and a small .28 jet !
I have no doubt I could go down to Sac and trap 135mph now. I just did my 60-130 mph run on a nice level stretch..
6.9 seconds!!
I am babying the throttle up to 60 mph. And this is on low boost 12-13psi, and a small .28 jet !
Why do you continue lying even after FACTS LIKE THE 1'S POSTED BELOW MONTHS AGO ABOUT THE REALITY your Nitrous SHOT size MUST BE LARGER THAN 100 MORE LIKELY 150+
Even your OWN FORUM DOUBTS/CALLS YOU OUT ON YOUR SHOT HP Nozzle SIZE
!!!TERRY@BMS
JB3 NX Nitrous Testing & New N54 dyno record - 05-25-2010, 10:23 AM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JB3 NX nitrous integration FTW?
Just got back in the office. Much data to dig through. But the objective of today's tuning session was to identify the fueling limits and I think we found one. I'll modify this post as I go through more data.
The car:
Our automatic 135i
The mods:
JB3 18 ohm board, 1.2k fueling resistors
NX dry nitrous kit. Simply the best hardware out.
Coolingmist meth injection, 100% meth
AR nitrous/meth elbow
3" ******* downpipes
Code3 IC
BMS DCI
97 octane
Drag radials
Worth noting:
Stock 135i single 2.75" catback system
@ 18-19 PSI
05-26-2010, 02:57 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally Posted by Terrance28
I think the highest I am gonna go to is a .32 or maybe a .33.
I had great power with no issues with .38 jet. ( 11.20@128 mph) ECU liked it. Just have at least 100 octane, and minimal meth (small nozzle). Also suggest come off the button between shifts momentarily.
I think the highest I am gonna go to is a .32 or maybe a .33.
I had great power with no issues with .38 jet. ( 11.20@128 mph) ECU liked it. Just have at least 100 octane, and minimal meth (small nozzle). Also suggest come off the button between shifts momentarily.
Terrance28 above w/LARGER .38 shot runs 7-8 mph SLOWER THAN YOUR
.28 SHOT! I don't care what FAKE pictures of .28 nozzle you dig up & post, you know damned well your results are FAR FASTER than ANYONE on your OWN forum w/MORE MODS & LARGER SHOTS of Nitrous, you even posted/LIED you SAW the gains made by your little tiny baby 60 hp shot on DYNO!
Originally Posted by hotrod182
The small dry shot is only good for about 60Hp according to the dyno on Brians 135i.
The small dry shot is only good for about 60Hp according to the dyno on Brians 135i.
Terry @ BMS
It just goes by how much power you're adding. So a 35 jet is around a 100 shot according to the dyno.
08-14-2010, 07:18 AM
It just goes by how much power you're adding. So a 35 jet is around a 100 shot according to the dyno.
08-14-2010, 07:18 AM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally Posted by CBR335
Warren, you are an animal. That was a straight shot, not progressive right? What size jet? Were you using a WOT switch or a manual button? I can't remember from your earlier threads.
Warren, you are an animal. That was a straight shot, not progressive right? What size jet? Were you using a WOT switch or a manual button? I can't remember from your earlier threads.
hotrod182
Demigod Posts: 1,808
Join Date: Jan 2008
I used a .28 jet. Manual push button set up. Basic meth kit with standard boost switch. No controllers on anything. Best on the Vbox was 133mph. Beyond a doubt, that would have been solid 135mph runs at Sacramento.
I used a .28 jet. Manual push button set up. Basic meth kit with standard boost switch. No controllers on anything. Best on the Vbox was 133mph. Beyond a doubt, that would have been solid 135mph runs at Sacramento.
Demigod Posts: 1,808
Join Date: Jan 2008
I used a .28 jet. Manual push button set up. Basic meth kit with standard boost switch. No controllers on anything. Best on the Vbox was 133mph. Beyond a doubt, that would have been solid 135mph runs at Sacramento.
I used a .28 jet. Manual push button set up. Basic meth kit with standard boost switch. No controllers on anything. Best on the Vbox was 133mph. Beyond a doubt, that would have been solid 135mph runs at Sacramento.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OldBooster
Warren, honey ... in the spirit of fun, friendship, and transparency, it is time to come clean. Or, if you've made an honest mistake, you are reading the jet stamp upside down. It says 82.
I've run a straight, non-progressive-controlled 28 jet shot, a 32 jet, a 36 jet, a 38 jet, a 40 jet .... and the only time my tires broke loose and my stock engine/turbos revved like your video shows, is with a 46 jet and MS109. (Now, you might have been on a slick road surface ... I'll give you that possibility).
My 135 is lighter, my open exhaust system is lighter, my wheels are lighter, my engine and AT is fresher ... we have the same engine, turbos, and gear ratio ... and all I've ever been able to garner is, one time; a 127 mph trap speed. So please share our secret, as I don't believe in miracles. ;o) (two .28 jets?)
OldBooster
Warren, honey ... in the spirit of fun, friendship, and transparency, it is time to come clean. Or, if you've made an honest mistake, you are reading the jet stamp upside down. It says 82.
I've run a straight, non-progressive-controlled 28 jet shot, a 32 jet, a 36 jet, a 38 jet, a 40 jet .... and the only time my tires broke loose and my stock engine/turbos revved like your video shows, is with a 46 jet and MS109. (Now, you might have been on a slick road surface ... I'll give you that possibility).
My 135 is lighter, my open exhaust system is lighter, my wheels are lighter, my engine and AT is fresher ... we have the same engine, turbos, and gear ratio ... and all I've ever been able to garner is, one time; a 127 mph trap speed. So please share our secret, as I don't believe in miracles. ;o) (two .28 jets?)
CBR335
08-14-2010, 11:10 AM
If Warren is running a .28 jet and I am running a .032 jet, then someone is reading the jet stamp wrong perhaps. Larry, are you running a 0.046 jet when you say a 46 jet or a 0.46 jet? From my testing, a true .46 jet would be a huge shot for this car and would make a ton of IMO dangerous power.
If you guys are truly running jets with an orifice 10 times the diameter of mine, I would like to see the stamp and the logs! I think I might need to order some more jets and a 10 lb bottle ASAP. Lol.
08-14-2010, 11:10 AM
If Warren is running a .28 jet and I am running a .032 jet, then someone is reading the jet stamp wrong perhaps. Larry, are you running a 0.046 jet when you say a 46 jet or a 0.46 jet? From my testing, a true .46 jet would be a huge shot for this car and would make a ton of IMO dangerous power.
If you guys are truly running jets with an orifice 10 times the diameter of mine, I would like to see the stamp and the logs! I think I might need to order some more jets and a 10 lb bottle ASAP. Lol.
HOTROD182
08-14-2010, 11:22 AM
Well since the kit is off of the car right now, I will disassemble the injector, pull out the jet and see what it says on it, as you guys now have me curious, LOL.
08-14-2010, 11:22 AM
Well since the kit is off of the car right now, I will disassemble the injector, pull out the jet and see what it says on it, as you guys now have me curious, LOL.
Yet your 335i magically beats ALL, & still gets 31mpg on way home lol
Furthermore you insist you ONLY SPRAY IN 3RD gear, @ 60mph on up, never @ 1st or 2nd.. I'm over your lies enjoy your 15min of Internet fame...
Last edited by Thericker; 09-07-2010 at 12:35 AM.
09-12-2010, 10:21 PM
#163
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 2,177
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes
on
12 Posts
2014 Audi RS7
Guys,
Ran a 6.66 60-130 Thursday night.
Who do I send the file to? Drew on Bimmerboost and Scott on 6speedonline already verified it.
Keep racing and be safe!!
Ran a 6.66 60-130 Thursday night.
Who do I send the file to? Drew on Bimmerboost and Scott on 6speedonline already verified it.
Keep racing and be safe!!
09-12-2010, 11:16 PM
#165
Hey Tom, I just ran some 60-130 at the track and my times actually seemed better testing on the streets. My best time on the streets was a low 8 but no file was saved, I'm not sure why. It appeared on the display and when I went retrieve it....no dice 
. Anyways, I find these 60-130 runs very confusing and so hit and miss). I use to think a high to mid 7 would be likely but after doing some runs it's not going to happen, at least not with a flat road....oh well. The gearing in our cars make it very tough and the one shift we have sucks!!!!
My 2-3 shift is sooo slow I sometimes wonder if starting off in 3rd with no shifts might be better. Any suggestion? These runs are definitely much harder than I anticipated and tough when street conditions only allow one run in. I'm not sure where you guys find the spots you do but here in San Jose is near impossible.
I guarantee faster times will come but I figured since no other E55's aren't posting anything I would put it up. I know it's not fast but until I get a better opportunity do some more runs I'll submit this one. Very slow when compared to Dads runs and other Bimmers but it is what is is. My car shines in the 1/4 mile and that's what I need to stick with....
Tom, let me know where to send the file to get verified.
This run was taken at Sacramento Raceway this past Friday.
EDIT: Tom, you have mail!
. Anyways, I find these 60-130 runs very confusing and so hit and miss). I use to think a high to mid 7 would be likely but after doing some runs it's not going to happen, at least not with a flat road....oh well. The gearing in our cars make it very tough and the one shift we have sucks!!!! My 2-3 shift is sooo slow I sometimes wonder if starting off in 3rd with no shifts might be better. Any suggestion? These runs are definitely much harder than I anticipated and tough when street conditions only allow one run in. I'm not sure where you guys find the spots you do but here in San Jose is near impossible.
I guarantee faster times will come but I figured since no other E55's aren't posting anything I would put it up. I know it's not fast but until I get a better opportunity do some more runs I'll submit this one. Very slow when compared to Dads runs and other Bimmers but it is what is is. My car shines in the 1/4 mile and that's what I need to stick with...
. Tom, let me know where to send the file to get verified.
This run was taken at Sacramento Raceway this past Friday.
EDIT: Tom, you have mail!
Last edited by bassn_07; 09-12-2010 at 11:59 PM.
09-13-2010, 03:32 AM
#166
Super Member
shouldnt a 60-130 timed run start at 60mph? meaning 60,go! starting from 0 all in, then measuring the time once you hit 60mph to 130? sounds retarded. i'll stick to freeway rolls FROM 60 via 3 honks.
09-13-2010, 03:35 AM
#167
Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
335i
Hey Tom, I just ran some 60-130 at the track and my times actually seemed better testing on the streets. My best time on the streets was a low 8 but no file was saved, I'm not sure why. It appeared on the display and when I went retrieve it....no dice . Anyways, I find these 60-130 runs very confusing and so hit and miss). I use to think a high to mid 7 would be likely but after doing some runs it's not going to happen, at least not with a flat road....oh well. The gearing in our cars make it very tough and the one shift we have sucks!!!!
My 2-3 shift is sooo slow I sometimes wonder if starting off in 3rd with no shifts might be better. Any suggestion? These runs are definitely much harder than I anticipated and tough when street conditions only allow one run in. I'm not sure where you guys find the spots you do but here in San Jose is near impossible.
I guarantee faster times will come but I figured since no other E55's aren't posting anything I would put it up. I know it's not fast but until I get a better opportunity do some more runs I'll submit this one. Very slow when compared to Dads runs and other Bimmers but it is what is is. My car shines in the 1/4 mile and that's what I need to stick with....
Tom, let me know where to send the file to get verified.
This run was taken at Sacramento Raceway this past Friday.
EDIT: Tom, you have mail!
. Anyways, I find these 60-130 runs very confusing and so hit and miss). I use to think a high to mid 7 would be likely but after doing some runs it's not going to happen, at least not with a flat road....oh well. The gearing in our cars make it very tough and the one shift we have sucks!!!! My 2-3 shift is sooo slow I sometimes wonder if starting off in 3rd with no shifts might be better. Any suggestion? These runs are definitely much harder than I anticipated and tough when street conditions only allow one run in. I'm not sure where you guys find the spots you do but here in San Jose is near impossible.
I guarantee faster times will come but I figured since no other E55's aren't posting anything I would put it up. I know it's not fast but until I get a better opportunity do some more runs I'll submit this one. Very slow when compared to Dads runs and other Bimmers but it is what is is. My car shines in the 1/4 mile and that's what I need to stick with...
. Tom, let me know where to send the file to get verified.
This run was taken at Sacramento Raceway this past Friday.
EDIT: Tom, you have mail!
Also Alan, make sure you are in full acceleration before 60mph. I would really be at full throttle by 50mph. Doing the qtr mile and getting your times may not be as fast if your shift points don't favor a 60-130 run. By that I mean, on my car it shifts right at 60mph during the 1/4 mile run. However in a 60-130, I will short shift at 50mph into 3rd and then accelerate up to 100mph before I have to shift into 4th gear. What were the ambient temps like at Sacramento?
09-13-2010, 11:50 AM
#168
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Philly
Posts: 2,171
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
997TT, R8 V10+, G550, Plaid S
nope - most people start around 40mph. goal is to be 100% throttle and in the powerband before you hit 60mph.
there are definetly tricks to the 60-130 things, i've seen some cars that produce results that are very difficult to believe.
there are definetly tricks to the 60-130 things, i've seen some cars that produce results that are very difficult to believe.
09-13-2010, 02:27 PM
#170
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Southern, CA.
Posts: 9,155
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes
on
17 Posts
V12-Biturbo
Warren READ THIS....YOU DON'T HAVE A MEASLY .28 60 HP SHOT
Notice a similar Trap speed? Yours are even higher 133-135+mph w/ 60 hp really???
Nitrous: 60-130mph - 6.7 (V-box verified) 9/9/2010
Nitrous: 1/4 mile - 11.111 @ 130.47. Bradenton Motorsports 9/9/2010.
Nitrous: 1/4 mile - 11.111 @ 130.47. Bradenton Motorsports 9/9/2010.
Last edited by Thericker; 09-13-2010 at 02:34 PM.
11-09-2010, 07:42 PM
#172
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: merryland
Posts: 1,603
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
cornfed gtr and m3
I ran an 8.16...up a 1.57% incline... cuz that is how I roll!
https://mbworld.org/forums/w211-amg/...-vbox-run.html
https://mbworld.org/forums/w211-amg/...-vbox-run.html
11-09-2010, 09:17 PM
#173
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 2,771
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'13 GT-R AMS Alpha 9+, CLA45, E55
I ran an 8.16...up a 1.57% incline... cuz that is how I roll!
https://mbworld.org/forums/w211-amg/...-vbox-run.html
https://mbworld.org/forums/w211-amg/...-vbox-run.html
What were ambient and iat temps like?
11-10-2010, 09:53 AM
#175
MBWorld Fanatic!
I ran an 8.16...up a 1.57% incline... cuz that is how I roll!
https://mbworld.org/forums/w211-amg/...-vbox-run.html
https://mbworld.org/forums/w211-amg/...-vbox-run.html
Tom
