M272 2.5L airbox mods
Was my theory correct? Just curious what everyone else thinks. I know there won't be very much gained, but it sure looked like it couldn't hurt. Before and after pictures.
Last edited by bumpnzx3; Mar 16, 2009 at 10:03 PM.
I'm interested to see if the intake got louder, and although I doubt there were any performance gains to be had, it sure would be nice.

I ended up making my own version of the LET intake that's available for the C32/C55. I hollowed out the airbox and used my rubber material I had as a spacer to creat a tad more volume. I then took off the factory snorkles on the front of the car and used some spare 3" tubing I had from my Focus tuning days, along with a couple clamp on universal filters right in front of the intake holes in the radiator support.
I first drove it with the K&N filters I had in there to begin with, hollowed out airbox, and factory snorkles. I didn't notice any difference in performance, but maybe a shade louder under acceleration or free-rev from idle. When I used my home-made franken-intake, it may have spun up faster from around 4.5k to redline. It sure seemed like it did, but then again, the mind seems to experience what it wants to from time to time. The intake also seemed to be a little louder. Overall- I think I will leave it with the hollowed out airbox and my snorkle/filter setup. I looks better, sounds better, and seems like it might be a little faster. Even if it isn't faster, it sure seems like it is.....kinda the same concept behind a SprintBooster

If anyone decides to do something like this- be sure to plug the two 1/4" holes in the bottom of the stock airbox. If not- the engine will be sucking in unfilter air from those two spots.
Could you retrofit an airbox off a 3.0L or 3.5L on to your 2.5L? That is assuming they are in fact larger, are compatible and would fit under the hood...
Trending Topics
I just know that the shape of the intake tubes/the bottom section of the airbox not shown in my pictures forces the air to the top of the airbox- right into the ridges that I cut off. Again, not sure if I truely accomplished anything, but it sure seems like I did, so that's good enough for me.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
I still have around six good months left in me.
I just know that the shape of the intake tubes/the bottom section of the airbox not shown in my pictures forces the air to the top of the airbox- right into the ridges that I cut off. Again, not sure if I truely accomplished anything, but it sure seems like I did, so that's good enough for me.
Last edited by Krytech; Mar 17, 2009 at 02:58 PM. Reason: Added quote
Also your physics is backwards... Air is never "sucked" in, its forced in by natural atmospheric forces at roughly 14psi, Air is PUSHED into the cylinders not pulled in.
...awaiting my new intake parts, will post photos when complete.....this is extreme intake design.....i think i have some kind of theory to solve our intake problem
i hope im right




