C32 AMG Brake Upgrade Discussion Thread
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,597
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco, CA
1996 C36 AMG, 1995 Volvo 850 Turbowagon
anyway, phattbam, just get them 
. all u need is bigger wheels to have clearance (just so u know, u'd have harder time finding proper winter tires and cables that'll fit)
. all u need is bigger wheels to have clearance (just so u know, u'd have harder time finding proper winter tires and cables that'll fit)
Banned
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 738
Likes: 0
'01 C240/6
Originally posted by JustinTRW
If the C32 brakes cause ABS to engage sooner (because the tires would otherwise skid sooner), reduces stopping distance because..... time * speed = distance. Agree?
What's wrong with my logic? The way that I see your theory is correct is when both brakes are so incredibly powerful, that the time for ABS to engage is next to nothing for both. Like in your 1000hp vs. 1500hp analogy....both cars are so powerful anyway.
I agree that stickier tires help A LOT.
If the C32 brakes cause ABS to engage sooner (because the tires would otherwise skid sooner), reduces stopping distance because..... time * speed = distance. Agree?
What's wrong with my logic? The way that I see your theory is correct is when both brakes are so incredibly powerful, that the time for ABS to engage is next to nothing for both. Like in your 1000hp vs. 1500hp analogy....both cars are so powerful anyway.
I agree that stickier tires help A LOT.
1) It is really only relevant in theory, at least as applies to most buyers of "big brakes." Because your point is really only applicable to emergency stops, where you are trying to get from, say, 60 to 0 in the shortest distance. Most buyers of big brakes don't buy for that reason, but buy because they think their car will stop "harder" with bigger brakes. In other words, its not the .0001 second when the brakes are first slammed on in a panic situation that people are really concerned about, and that is the only time period relevant to your point. People buy big brakes because they (erroneously) believe they will stop shorter and harder in everyday, hard street driving - you obviously understand the issues here and I'm sure you will agree that those people are wrong.
2) I highly doubt there would be any difference in the initial panic application, first .0001 seconds. All modern brakes are incredibly strong, and when a car is moving quickly, it doesn't take much, when you slam on the brakes, to get the wheels to break traction and start skidding - I've done it lots of times on the track with non-ABS cars, and at speed takes a lot less force than one might think. I think the 1500 hp / 1000 hp analogy is a good one and applicable in this instance.
Nevertheless, your point deserves kudos because it is the only one in this entire, lengthy thread that at least puts forth a plausible theory as to why bigger brakes might decrease stopping distance. Its one of the few sensible ones amongst a forest of nonsense.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,597
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco, CA
1996 C36 AMG, 1995 Volvo 850 Turbowagon
one thing is really true, i get much less brake fade in the 13" brembos than stock
food (brakes) for thought...c/d tests 70-0 mph braking distance:
toyota rav4: 163 ft
ferrari 380 modena f1: 175 mph
wow...so toyota rav4 brakes are better than ferrari brakes right?? :p
food (brakes) for thought...c/d tests 70-0 mph braking distance:
toyota rav4: 163 ft
ferrari 380 modena f1: 175 mph
wow...so toyota rav4 brakes are better than ferrari brakes right?? :p
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,080
Likes: 4
From: San Diego, CA
C32 AMG
Thanks SoCal. I'm just glad that there are people on this board who have solid understanding of automobiles and how to manipulate them. I enjoyed this debate throughly to be honest. It really solidified my understanding. I'm also reminded of last night where I was going rather quickly and had to slow down hard on a downhill right hand bend. Everyone should know about weight transfer and how it affects you! Love this stuff!
Back on topic...you are right about the "on street" performance of big brake kits. If someone enjoyed tracking their car often, I could certainly see why they would want bigger brakes. My Honda Accord saw duty around Palomar Mountain. I was 100% satisfied with the braking distances, but not towards the end of the run. My fluid had boiled causing dramatic fade after coming down the mountain HARD, which made it difficult to keep the car still on downhill slopes when I was done. A cool down period would have helped. Heavy shuttering was the product of either warping or uneven pad wear onto the rotor. These are not MB brakes of course, but if this sounds like you after a day on the track get some motul...a just maybe a big brake kit is worth it to you.
Back on topic...you are right about the "on street" performance of big brake kits. If someone enjoyed tracking their car often, I could certainly see why they would want bigger brakes. My Honda Accord saw duty around Palomar Mountain. I was 100% satisfied with the braking distances, but not towards the end of the run. My fluid had boiled causing dramatic fade after coming down the mountain HARD, which made it difficult to keep the car still on downhill slopes when I was done. A cool down period would have helped. Heavy shuttering was the product of either warping or uneven pad wear onto the rotor. These are not MB brakes of course, but if this sounds like you after a day on the track get some motul...a just maybe a big brake kit is worth it to you.
Last edited by JustinTRW; Aug 3, 2002 at 02:30 AM.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,597
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco, CA
1996 C36 AMG, 1995 Volvo 850 Turbowagon
cross-drilled rotors...they need to be set properly other wise they crack...one aftermarket company stopped selling them and switched to slotted rotors because customers complained the cross-drilled rotors cracked (due to inadequate setting)...
Out Of Control!!
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 20,081
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Volvo V90 CC
Originally posted by vadim
I'm not saying that this happens to all cross-drilled rotors (where did you get this from?)
I'm not saying that this happens to all cross-drilled rotors (where did you get this from?)
8-2-2002 10:28AM vadim wrote: [I]Take a look at this first[I]
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,498
Likes: 3
From: Ashburn, VA
'19 GLC 300, '19 TM3SR+
Originally posted by pocholin
8-2-2002 11:22AM vadim wrote: No, that's not my car, but it's a MB. I just keep this photo to scare others who believe that cross-drilled rotors are the next best thing after sliced bread. I've heard of things like this happen to them from more than one person.
8-2-2002 10:28AM vadim wrote: [I]Take a look at this first[I]
8-2-2002 11:22AM vadim wrote: No, that's not my car, but it's a MB. I just keep this photo to scare others who believe that cross-drilled rotors are the next best thing after sliced bread. I've heard of things like this happen to them from more than one person.
8-2-2002 10:28AM vadim wrote: [I]Take a look at this first[I]
Out Of Control!!
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 35,855
Likes: 3
From: Southern CA
Rotors cracking is not dependant on the rotors being cross-drilled, but HOW they are cross-drilled. There is a lot more to cross-drilling a rotor than simply drilling holes in it. This is why you want to only use quality cross-drilled rotors such as Brembo. And never buy rotors that are drilled by local shops. The first sign of a rotor being poorly drilled is if you can see through the holes (out the other side). The holes are NOT supposed to line up on both sides. The second sign is whether they vein has been compromised by incorrectly drilling near/through it. This is very common when companies take Brembo blanks and drill them. Lastly, whether or not the holes are chamferd properly (rounding the edges, rather than leaving sharp corners) will ultimately make the difference in whether your rotors will crack.
MB World Stories
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren
Verdad Gallardo
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine
Verdad Gallardo
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction
Verdad Gallardo
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping
Verdad Gallardo
10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used
Verdad Gallardo
Out Of Control!!
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 35,855
Likes: 3
From: Southern CA
There seems to be a lot of confusion in this thread, which I hope to clear up.
Big Brake kits, designed properly, WILL make your car stop MUCH BETTER thoughout all aspects of braking. I said that even on normal braking, I noticed myself having to adjust 10 ft back from where I intended on stopping because I was already almost stopped. This is normal braking. I have also found myself behind cars while going 100 mph, and having to slam on the brakes. My car stops VERY QUICKLY. Stock brakes are good, but are nothing close to a Brembo Big Brake kit. The C32 brakes are better than the other C class brakes. Not just in terms of brake fade, but in all aspects of braking. This does not mean that the stock brakes are poor, but there is MUCH to be gained. Why not go and test drive one and find out?
Big Brake kits, designed properly, WILL make your car stop MUCH BETTER thoughout all aspects of braking. I said that even on normal braking, I noticed myself having to adjust 10 ft back from where I intended on stopping because I was already almost stopped. This is normal braking. I have also found myself behind cars while going 100 mph, and having to slam on the brakes. My car stops VERY QUICKLY. Stock brakes are good, but are nothing close to a Brembo Big Brake kit. The C32 brakes are better than the other C class brakes. Not just in terms of brake fade, but in all aspects of braking. This does not mean that the stock brakes are poor, but there is MUCH to be gained. Why not go and test drive one and find out?
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,597
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco, CA
1996 C36 AMG, 1995 Volvo 850 Turbowagon
here is something from another moderator on another forum...
http://www.volvospeed.com/vs_forum/i...=ST&f=2&t=2468
http://www.volvospeed.com/vs_forum/i...=ST&f=2&t=2468
Senior Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 370
Likes: 1
From: Miami, Florida
2001 C240
Big brake kit
Hey guys what's up? I found out that www.tfoperformance.com has a big brake upgrade for the c-class. It's made by hp racing... it runs about $2300... i thought i'd post a pic of them... i saw them on an audi the other day and they're beautiful... steel braided lines, 6 piston calipers, and 13" slotted and crossdrilled rotors. If anyone's interested just go to their website and call their 800 number, ask for henry. i'm not advertising, i'm just letting people know what's available and where to get it... here's a pic of more or less what it would look like
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,783
Likes: 0
From: Sunny South Florida
1995 Jaguar XJS Convertible
those holes sure are drilled close together. I would do some research on them first!!!
Some dorks think they can cross-drill any rotors, and all will be well.. little do they know...
Some dorks think they can cross-drill any rotors, and all will be well.. little do they know...
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,422
Likes: 0
From: SonicMS/SF Krew
'08 BMW e92 335i
i looked into the AMG factory setup from the C32. from what the parts lady told me. rotors(front/rear), calipers(front/rear), and pads(front/rear) would run about $1600 USD. i'm going to stop by my dealership again today to get actual part numbers. also the diameter of the brembo big brake kit compared to the AMG's is smaller. the brembos are 332 vs. AMG 345.. somewhere around there.. price for brembos' $3300USD vs. ~$1600 USD AMG...
for those who have done this conversion was it a direct replacement of the parts listed above???
for those who have done this conversion was it a direct replacement of the parts listed above???
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,744
Likes: 1
Originally posted by phattbam
i looked into the AMG factory setup from the C32. from what the parts lady told me. rotors(front/rear), calipers(front/rear), and pads(front/rear) would run about $1600 USD. i'm going to stop by my dealership again today to get actual part numbers. also the diameter of the brembo big brake kit compared to the AMG's is smaller. the brembos are 332 vs. AMG 345.. somewhere around there.. price for brembos' $3300USD vs. ~$1600 USD AMG...
for those who have done this conversion was it a direct replacement of the parts listed above???
i looked into the AMG factory setup from the C32. from what the parts lady told me. rotors(front/rear), calipers(front/rear), and pads(front/rear) would run about $1600 USD. i'm going to stop by my dealership again today to get actual part numbers. also the diameter of the brembo big brake kit compared to the AMG's is smaller. the brembos are 332 vs. AMG 345.. somewhere around there.. price for brembos' $3300USD vs. ~$1600 USD AMG...
for those who have done this conversion was it a direct replacement of the parts listed above???
EDIT: Forget the above. I just found an article which confirms the front rotors as being 345mm. http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/S...50/w203c32.htm
Last edited by Lynn; Sep 10, 2002 at 08:00 PM.
Super Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 713
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
C32 AMG
Originally posted by phattbam
i looked into the AMG factory setup from the C32. from what the parts lady told me. rotors(front/rear), calipers(front/rear), and pads(front/rear) would run about $1600 USD. i'm going to stop by my dealership again today to get actual part numbers. also the diameter of the brembo big brake kit compared to the AMG's is smaller. the brembos are 332 vs. AMG 345.. somewhere around there.. price for brembos' $3300USD vs. ~$1600 USD AMG...
for those who have done this conversion was it a direct replacement of the parts listed above???
i looked into the AMG factory setup from the C32. from what the parts lady told me. rotors(front/rear), calipers(front/rear), and pads(front/rear) would run about $1600 USD. i'm going to stop by my dealership again today to get actual part numbers. also the diameter of the brembo big brake kit compared to the AMG's is smaller. the brembos are 332 vs. AMG 345.. somewhere around there.. price for brembos' $3300USD vs. ~$1600 USD AMG...
for those who have done this conversion was it a direct replacement of the parts listed above???
Out Of Control!!
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 35,855
Likes: 3
From: Southern CA
The C32, SL, S, CL, new E55, and new CLK55 calipers are all Brembo-made. They are not the same as the Ferrari F50 caliper, however they still are good 4-piston calipers. Brembo makes many OEM calipers and rotors for different automobiles.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,249
Likes: 17
From: Chicagoland, IL
09 C63
All I have to say is...
HP RACING .. WHO?
I thought HP made printers?!
If you want aftermarket big... AP, Brembo, and a few other respectable brands that will cost a similar amount.
Ok I have to say one more thing..
How about a detailed set of info on fitting the C32 brakes onto our 'cheap' cars??
P
HP RACING .. WHO?
I thought HP made printers?!
If you want aftermarket big... AP, Brembo, and a few other respectable brands that will cost a similar amount.
Ok I have to say one more thing..
How about a detailed set of info on fitting the C32 brakes onto our 'cheap' cars??
P
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,422
Likes: 0
From: SonicMS/SF Krew
'08 BMW e92 335i
i dont think my car was cheap. i just didnt have the patience to wait any longer for the c32. and for others MB's are not cheap.. they are on the pricier side. if you opted for the coupe maybe it was because that was the only MB with the 6spd other than the slk? some like 2dr more than 4. just my thoughts...
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,422
Likes: 0
From: SonicMS/SF Krew
'08 BMW e92 335i
Originally posted by Lynn
On the Kleemann page they show their 332mm rotor brakes as requiring 18" wheels. The C32 has 17" wheels and 345mm is 13.58". That doesn't seem like the 345mm brakes will fit under the 17" wheels. Can you confirm the size of the AMG rotors?
EDIT: Forget the above. I just found an article which confirms the front rotors as being 245mm. http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/S...50/w203c32.htm
On the Kleemann page they show their 332mm rotor brakes as requiring 18" wheels. The C32 has 17" wheels and 345mm is 13.58". That doesn't seem like the 345mm brakes will fit under the 17" wheels. Can you confirm the size of the AMG rotors?
EDIT: Forget the above. I just found an article which confirms the front rotors as being 245mm. http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/S...50/w203c32.htm
