




















W203/CL203/S203 TIRE Discussion Thread - Every question on TIRES
Would it be enough helium to reduce the weight of the wheel? That sounds like a better solution.
If the only reason for nitrogen is for it's dryness, would using an air compressor with a dryer do the same thing? Why would pure nitrogen give you a better ride?
Last edited by vadim; Nov 11, 2002 at 01:34 AM.
As others mentioned, it won't affect the ride in most cases. Track applications, however, require consistency to a much greater degree than our daily low-speed commute. The air we breathe and use to inflate our tires mostly consists of nitrogen already (78%). It's likely cheaper to get a tank of compressed *moistureless* nitrogen than to properly dry the ambient air, as far as tire applications are concerned.
Nitrogen is used in track applications to get consistency in tire pressures. But, if you are Michael Shumacher, 1 psi can make a noticeable difference to you.
Most street drivers, on the other hand, would NEVER notice even a huge variance in tire pressure. In fact, most people don't even notice when one of their tires has ZERO pressure! I see posts all the time (I think I've seen some here) from "enthusiast" drivers who have had a flat and drove for miles before even noticing it.
Certainly, there is no one here that could notice the small changes that a tire with normal air in it undergoes as it heats up (the pressure increases) on their street car.
Anyone who thinks they can is flattering himself.
why is the sky blue? we truly may never know.
But we've known for some time why the sky is blue... it has to do with the atmosphere scattering the light. Go here for more info:
http://www.why-is-the-sky-blue.org/w...-sky-blue.html
Oh, wait, that was one of them there rhetorical questions, wasn't it?
Nevermind
Would it be enough helium to reduce the weight of the wheel? That sounds like a better solution.
If the only reason for nitrogen is for it's dryness, would using an air compressor with a dryer do the same thing? Why would pure nitrogen give you a better ride?
If the air in a tire were absolutely dry, there would be very little pressure increase in the tire as it heats up during driving. The more moisture in the air in the tire, the more the PSI will increase as the tire heats up.
But, the tire pressure specs are for cold tires, and take into account the PSI increase that occurs in the tire with normal air in it.
If you were to put pure nitrogen in a tire (which is theoretical only, because to get pure nitrogen you'd have to first evacuate all the air in the tire), then theoretically the tire's PSI would not increase as much as the tire warms up. You could accomplish the same thing (lower PSI) by simply letting a little air out of the tire.
Again, all of the differences and increases we are talking about are completely unnoticeable - unless perhaps your name is Michael Schumacher.
BUT!!
My Pilot Sports were shot at 15k miles, so I went with the Sumis. I love the tires - "All Season Ultra High Performance" should work well in our Illinois winters.
They are also non-directional so you can rotate them.
Another neat feature is a little lip that (hopefully) keeps you from curbing the rim.
*ahem* That assumes that the tire shop doesn't destroy the rims first.
Noise is comparable to the PS's. Traction is pretty good, too - but not quite as good as the Michelins.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
The Sumo is 90 percent as good for half the price (or less). AND, it's all-season.
Can anyone honestly tell me if by going to Performance tires from the factory std All Season tires that there was an increase in tire noise and a decrease in comfort.
As an 'old fart' I want my cake and eat it too.
So please; no playing in this sandbox if you have a C32 AMG, Sports package sedan or a C7 packge Coupe?
Thanx
P.S.
Luke at the tirerack tells me I can't use their test results as that would be comparing 'apples' and 'oranges'.
If so, then you might want to try the Yokohama AVS dB. Tire Rack calls this a Ultra High Performance All-Season tire. I had these on my E320 and thought they performed very well for an all-season tire and they were very quiet. Give them a try.
If I understand your question correctly, you want an OEM size tire that has better performance and less noise than what came from the factory. Am I correct?
If so, then you might want to try the Yokohama AVS dB. Tire Rack calls this a Ultra High Performance All-Season tire. I had these on my E320 and thought they performed very well for an all-season tire and they were very quiet. Give them a try.
I decided to keep my std wheel/tire combo since my wheel deals fell through. They are all seasons (Michelins) and should be OK for my climate in the winter month. But I want to go to 17" performance for the nicer month (mostly sunny but quite often wet). That is where I have my question. I rather not increase my noise and decrease my comfort. Or would I if I were to go this route?
Last edited by amdeutsch; Nov 22, 2002 at 06:42 AM.
I was just looking for a generalization. Plus 1 sizing appearently doesn't hurt the comfort whereas the tire brand can affect the noise.
Example:
Right now I got Michelins. I know a lot of people on here don't like the Contis, performance(?) or all-season(?), but MB picked them as OEM. Am I comparing apples and oranges again?
I've heard Kumho 712's are better comfort but not all season and can be "Jekyll and Hyde" tires...some are great some suck.
I'm thinking of the tires on the new E class - Continental Contact all season.
I have a 01 C240 - changed the wheels/tire at about 15000 miles from 16's to 17's. I got the staggered set up that is from the C32 - split spoke wheels; 225/45x17FA and 245/40x17RA. I had the Conti OEM Allseason tires as 16 and went with 17" Conti Sport Contact as the initial upgrade. I was really happy with those tires. I dont drive too aggessively, but like my car to handle as well as possible without extensive modifications. I know alot of people do not like the Conti's, but I was not disappointed in them - good dry and wet handling. As I live in AZ, bad weather is not a real problem - other than the summer monsoons. But they handled the wet very well for me. I now have Kumho Ecsta 712. Upgrading to 17's you will notice a slight harsher ride with performance tires. But not too drastic, you will notice some of the bumps a little more. You can also look into performance all-season tires - Michelin and Sumitomo has them. Those are the only two I really looked at - the Michelins are a bit too expensive for me. With regard to road noice - it really depends on road conditions. The Kumhos are notoriously noisy tires, but on certain roads they ride as quiet as any I have had. So, it is hard to judge whether one is generally noisier than another. The route you take is up to you - you can get a performance oriented all-season tire and wont have to worry about chaning wheels/tires when winter come along. But you have that option if you keep your original wheels/tires. I guess it depends how harsh your winters are - if you need snow tires.
Good luck.
As an 'old fart' I want my cake and eat it too.
Especially for you "old farts"
From one "OLD FART" to all of you farts
, both young and old;Many, many thanx for the education and help.


I have 19x9.5 in the rear, and I'm trying to decide if I can size down to a 255 tire.
I want to try S-03, but they dont make the sizes that I am using. If you go with 255 at the rear, you probably have to go 225 in the front.


I use Yokohama AVS 265/30, it's quite good, i think as i haven't tried the other brand. They are not that noisy and grip is not bad. I'm thinking to switch to Falken when i'm finish with my yokohama. Falken has the thinest sidewall so if u have rubbing problem use Falken instead.






