




















W203/CL203/S203 TIRE Discussion Thread - Every question on TIRES
Now, I haven't looked at the speed rating of the RS-A's but I would expect them to be at least 130mph, and a few days before I noticed the buldge I did a top-speed run (hit limiter at 130mph). I am not sure if the two events are related or not, but in anycase I am looking closely at the other three tires. I am going to my local MB dealer tomorrow to see if they will cover it under warrenty.I haven't read anything about tire buldges with the RS-A's here that I can remember, is there a thread I overlooked or am I the one "lucky" person that gets the one in a million tire?
--Steffen
u prolly hit a pot hole or a bump or sumtin. i suggest u not to do top speed runs anymroe it is very dangerous u might get a blow out from that.
Tires are usually on their own warranty - you will probably get some sort of prorated refund. But it does sound like something that would be covered under the tire warranty (minus the mileage you already used up on the tire).
--Steffen
) that the dealer will get me a free replacement, but if I have to pay some amount it won't be the end of the world. I'll try both the dealer and the local Goodyear store to see what I can do.
i mean
if u have bulge on ur tire u shold not do high speed runs anymore. might blow out ur tire.
i work at good year. u shold get the road hazard. so next time u get sumtin like that it will be covered. which means u get a new tire..thats for "Just Tires" which is owned by good year
i am not engish my first language.
i mean
if u have bulge on ur tire u shold not do high speed runs anymore. might blow out ur tire.
I do agree with your comment. As soon as I noticed the buldge I had the spare put on from roadside assistance (poor guy, it was raining/snowing and I didn't want to go out and change the tire so I called MB and had them send someone).
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
As far as the tire manufacturer, though, it's viewed as user-created, not a defect, and will not be covered under their warranty.
Going 130mph is only 210km/h which isn't all that fast. When I lived in Germany 180-190km/h usually was my cruising speed when the roads where clear, and 250km/h wasn't out of the question either.
These things happen - it might have been road damage, or simply a manufacturing defect. Either way, it is exceedingly dangerous to drive any car with this kind of tire problem.
Are u driving a ferrari?! O_o
You don't have to go directly to the tire company - go to your dealer and have them take care of it under warranty.
These things happen - it might have been road damage, or simply a manufacturing defect. Either way, it is exceedingly dangerous to drive any car with this kind of tire problem.
Hmmm, actually no, it was a 2000 BMW 328i primarly, but it became somewhat uncomfortable over 180km/h due to the sport suspension. Now the 2003 E500 I had a brief oppertunity to drive felt just as comfortable at 250km/h as my C320 feels at 130km/h.
[B]You don't have to go directly to the tire company - go to your dealer and have them take care of it under warranty.
I was told by my MB dealer that tires were not covered under their warranty- where did you hear this?
<rant>
this is what bugs the **** out of me:
if i go to any tire dealer and purchase tires, i can add on 'road hazard' coverage for around $15 per tire. this will cover the cost of replacing if i have a problem like this... so WHY IN THE NAME OF ALL THAT IS HOLY can't MB add $60 to the price of a $30K car to cover this?? come on. hell, i know the answer, so they could charge me $250 to replace the damn tire.
</rant>
Last edited by yodlebenz; Mar 24, 2003 at 01:45 PM.
A damaged sidewall is a gray area - a good dealer would go to bat for you with Goodyear [or whomever] unless there is clear evidence of road hazard damage.
In any case, I don't disagree that throwing away the Goodyears and replacing them with something else [almost anything else] is a reasonable strategy. I personally avoid Pirelli at all costs - too much nylon in their casings, which often means flat-spotting problems. For this car, I would go with Michelin, Dunlop, or Continental, probably in that order. The Contis have, in the past, never been favorites of mine, but they are butter-smooth and wearing well on our C240, frankly much to my surprise. And they are dirt-cheap from the various big suppliers, like Tire Rack or Tires America.
Overall I give Phil Long European Imports an "A+" for customer service; hopefully all my future service experiences will reflect that.
"The tires supplied on your car are covered against defects in material or workmanship for the period of 4 years or 50k miles. If the tire fails during this period for these reasons, as long as there is at least 1.6 mm of tread depth remaining, it will be replaced under warranty".
Obviously, the key point here is whether a defect in materials or workmanship caused the failure.
This is indeed a change from the "old days", when MB [and every other car maker] always covered the tires separately under the tire manufacturer's warranty. This clearly says that if you can show a defect in the tire, MB will pay to have it replaced.
And a good dealer, as shown above, will do the right thing!
LOL... maybe if I had the new bmw 745 I might dare and come close to 200Km/h!
LOL... maybe if I had the new bmw 745 I might dare and come close to 200Km/h!
A 745i has a top speed of 155mph... 250Kmh.
Should MB replace tires that suffer from excessive wear due to a problem with alignment?
my car : 2002 C230K 9500 miles.
got it back from service A today. the dealer performed an alignment check because they can do it under warranty for the first 12K miles. it turns out that i was out of spec on quite a bit.
could this have anything to do with the fact that my tires (ContiSport2) are nearly shot at 9500 miles?? i mean this is wayyy to soon and i don't drive that hard.
here's the before and after. are these off enough to account for the wear?
LF Camber - before = -.30' after = -.16'
RF Camber - before = -.24' after = -.42'
LF Toe - before = .21' after = .05'
RF Toe - before = .12' after = .05'
LR Toe - before = .29' after = .14'
RR Toe - before = .16' after = .14'
X camber .26'
X caster -.30'
If so should the dealer be replacing my tires??
Last edited by yodlebenz; Mar 26, 2003 at 06:05 PM.
Also, your alignment was likely much better from the factory and has gone off while you have been driving it. The dealer is in no way responsible for this. And it can't be that far off, or you would probably have worn your tires a whole lot faster.
My only advice is to suck it up and buy new tires and hope that they got the alignment right this time. If they did get it right, hopefully you'll get better mileage out of your next set of tires.







