




















W203/CL203/S203 TIRE Discussion Thread - Every question on TIRES
My original Michelins lasted 10,000 miles, and my current Khumo's wont get 13,000 miles.
So do you have first-hand experience with tires that can give much better mileage? Don't care about performance, I want mileage. Don't care about the Z rating either.
So whatta ya know????
currently I'm running the Yokohama ES100. The rating is 280 and I think it's a lot better then the RE750.
btw, how do you guys drive your cars? My original PilotSport lasted 21k miles before I had to get it replaced. Of course that's till the rear are completely bold.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Had Pilot Sports on a C32 (driven very hard) and the fronts were gone in 9k miles.
P.S. Treadwear ratings are not comparable between tire brands. They are only used to show treadwear between tires for each manufacturer. So tread wear between a Michelin and a Toyo are useless but the ratings do mean something when looking at Pilot Sports and pilot Sport AS's.
They definitely outlast any other 19" tire I've seen.
Got about 20k on them and I easily have half of the tread left.
They have a harder compound on them.
Check tread life on www.discounttiredirect.com
Make sure your tires are balanced and aligned when needed. That keeps your tire wear down too.
Honestly any tire with a ZR or higher speed rating will wear out very quickly. If you want something a little harder I would look for a VR or HR rated tire. These tires will have much less grip but if your driving style is not very agressive you should be just fine. Good luck. ZR tires will get you a max of say 25k per set with minimal hard cornering and acceleration.
http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tiretech/general/utqg.jsp
-BFGoodrich
g-Force Sport
Blackwall
$105
-Kumho
ECSTA Supra 712
Blackwall
$89
-Kumho
Ecsta KU19
Blackwall
$101
-Sumitomo
HTR Z
Blackwall
$88
-Sumitomo
HTR Z II
Blackwall
$96
-Kumho
Ecsta ASX
Blackwall
$90
-Sumitomo
HTR+
Blackwall
$76
-Continental
ContiTouringContact CH95
Blackwall
$103
-Continental
ContiTouringContact CH95
Blackwall
$103
-Kumho
ECSTA KH11
Blackwall
$88
-Kumho
ECSTA 711
Blackwall
$73
Bennie
I discovered the origin of the noise tonight. Actually, it's a severely cupped LR tire. The majority of the tire is worn normally but the inside edge is massively cupped, in one point now it's down to the belts! Holy smokes dude!
Hmmm.
The car's never been in an accident where the rear was involved. It did have a minor hit on the LF wheel at one point earlier this year (other driver's fault) but wheel alignment was supposedly verified at the time of that repair.
It has 60,000 km and the MXV4 tires (16 inch HR) have about 4 mm of tread on them, except for the cupped tire's inside edge.
Usually cupping is caused by some play in the suspension, allowing the tire to oscillate somewhat. Considering it's the inside edge, it also might be toed out quite a bit. Camber looks normal to my eye.
Before the dealer investigates this wednesday, any thoughts?
TIA
It may also be thet the one tire is bad and the belts separated, causing the tread to cut away from the inside, appearing as excessive wear.
I experienced this problem with a set of factory installed Michelin's on a Toyota Supra I used to own (at around 7k miles!)...Toyota refused the warranty and I had to go through the manufacturer to get it 'replaced'...
Thanks for the reply.
So the Michelin tire was not the culprit, but rather the victim of a wonky M-B suspension
The car - as I wrote - had bever been hit there or curbed so this must have been a factory defect. Perhaps a bolt worked loose - I'm speculating here because I wasn't able to talk to either the shop that did the work or the service advisor at M-B.
Interestingly, the car did not drive unusually poorly though the tires did squeal quite a bit when turning right (not left) at moderate speeds. That should have been a clue.
With the 2 pins, the adjustment and a new Michelin MXV4, we're back on the road again, in a safer condition....and somewhat poorer
Last edited by Mike T.; Sep 8, 2004 at 11:14 PM. Reason: correction to part no










