Could these 0-100km/h stats be correct!!!
04-10-2011, 08:31 AM
#1
Super Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 642
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Audi A4 Quattro 2013
Could these 0-100km/h stats be correct!!!
I just did some research on a w203 I may be test driving. The Sports model 2006.
0-100km/h in 9.7 secs
That seams very slow.
Could this be true?
0-100km/h in 9.7 secs
That seams very slow.Could this be true?
04-10-2011, 08:53 AM
#2
Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: St.John's Canada
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2006 C230 6 speed
Not sure witch W203 your driving, i drive a 06 c230 2.5 V6 with 6 speed bone stock. I get to 60 in about 7.8 witch is slow. But the C230 is about looks not straight line speed.
04-10-2011, 08:57 AM
#3
Super Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 642
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Audi A4 Quattro 2013
Didnt drive it, just saw the stats
http://redbook.com.au/used-cars/details.aspx?R=83962
04-10-2011, 02:37 PM
#7
Super Moderator
Mercedes claims for the C200 are
9.4 secs MT, 9.7 secs Auto Wagon.
8.9 secs MT, 9.1 secs Auto Sedan.
9.4 secs MT, 9.7 secs Auto Wagon.
8.9 secs MT, 9.1 secs Auto Sedan.
Trending Topics
04-10-2011, 11:30 PM
#8
Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Houston & Karachi
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
C320 (Aftermarket)
well my friend has a C200K and we did a time on it. Its around 8.5 with 2 ppl in the car. But its a japanese spec W203, so i assume each region W203 has different power differences but not by much. By far i think the US spec W203 are slightly underpowered. But the W203s here in my country are all usually japanese or on gulf specs and almost every W203 are good in straight runs, but the only w203 we have here are C180K, C200K a few C230K and only 1 or 2 C240's. And all these vehicles perform good, even the C180K
04-10-2011, 11:53 PM
#10
Super Moderator
04-11-2011, 06:37 AM
#11
Super Moderator
well my friend has a C200K and we did a time on it. Its around 8.5 with 2 ppl in the car. But its a japanese spec W203, so i assume each region W203 has different power differences but not by much. By far i think the US spec W203 are slightly underpowered. But the W203s here in my country are all usually japanese or on gulf specs and almost every W203 are good in straight runs, but the only w203 we have here are C180K, C200K a few C230K and only 1 or 2 C240's. And all these vehicles perform good, even the C180K
C230 spec is equally the same. When the C230 nomenclature is used it means the 1800 M271 has a larger blower & more aggressive ECU tune.
In the USA they did not sell cars in C200 trim - only C230. In ROW the sedans were all C200 whereas the Coupe was available as a C230.
All these comments apply to M271 engined cars - not older M111 powered cars where nomenclature reflected capacity.
04-12-2011, 10:00 AM
#12
Super Moderator
04-13-2011, 06:04 AM
#15
Newbie
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
MB C200 K elegance 2007
C200 spec is the same worldwide.
C230 spec is equally the same. When the C230 nomenclature is used it means the 1800 M271 has a larger blower & more aggressive ECU tune.
In the USA they did not sell cars in C200 trim - only C230. In ROW the sedans were all C200 whereas the Coupe was available as a C230.
All these comments apply to M271 engined cars - not older M111 powered cars where nomenclature reflected capacity.
C230 spec is equally the same. When the C230 nomenclature is used it means the 1800 M271 has a larger blower & more aggressive ECU tune.
In the USA they did not sell cars in C200 trim - only C230. In ROW the sedans were all C200 whereas the Coupe was available as a C230.
All these comments apply to M271 engined cars - not older M111 powered cars where nomenclature reflected capacity.
C200K in gulf have 2.0 L engine and i own 2007 one from 0 - 60 in 8.2 s
All engines are differnet in gulf
04-13-2011, 09:06 AM
#16
Super Moderator
You are dreaming: Is yours a CGI?
2002-today M271
* 1.6 L (1597 cc) supercharged
* 1.8 L (1796 cc) supercharged/supercharged CGI
* 1.8 L (1796 cc) turbo
Give us your engine number & I will give you it's exact specs.
We are talking in W203 body here.
2002-today M271
* 1.6 L (1597 cc) supercharged
* 1.8 L (1796 cc) supercharged/supercharged CGI
* 1.8 L (1796 cc) turbo
Give us your engine number & I will give you it's exact specs.
We are talking in W203 body here.
Last edited by Glyn M Ruck; 04-13-2011 at 09:11 AM.
04-13-2011, 11:01 AM
#17
Newbie
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
MB C200 K elegance 2007
No my car is kompressor and yes w203 body
I don't know if you are right but in the insurance paper that i have for my car is written that the engine dispmlacment is 2000
This is the engine number
27194030858161
04-13-2011, 06:05 PM
#18
Super Moderator
Your engine is a 1796cc with Kompressor. Output 120 kW at 5500 RPM. Torque 240 Nm between 3000 & 4000 RPM. Acceleration 0 - 100 km/h (S mode - Auto) 9.1 secs.
04-14-2011, 03:02 AM
#19
Newbie
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
MB C200 K elegance 2007
8.2 is my time
Even with 9.1 it's still faster than those stats mentioned above that's means engine powers differs from one country to other
04-14-2011, 07:10 AM
#21
Super Moderator
The engine power does not vary by country. I have explained the different states of tune available. The slower times mentioned above are for the station wagon because it is heavier. A C200K is a C200K worldwide. Even a manual C200K will only do 8.2 down a mine shaft.
04-14-2011, 07:23 AM
#22
Super Moderator
These are the M271 engines as fitted to the W203
Now we have in addition fitted to the W204 & other models:
* 1.6 L (1597 cc) supercharged - fitted to Blue Efficiency models
& the * 1.8 L (1796 cc) turbo - fitted to some new 2012 models
W203 - M271
Now we have in addition fitted to the W204 & other models:
* 1.6 L (1597 cc) supercharged - fitted to Blue Efficiency models
& the * 1.8 L (1796 cc) turbo - fitted to some new 2012 models
W203 - M271
Last edited by Glyn M Ruck; 04-14-2011 at 07:35 AM.
04-16-2011, 09:18 PM
#24
Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Houston & Karachi
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
C320 (Aftermarket)
I think so too because i was told MB in every region had different power outputs on the models produced. Some models were not available to the US as well. But i am only familiar with the gulf spec and japanese spec W203 and when compared to the US spec it was a bit different but not by much.
04-16-2011, 09:25 PM
#25
Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Houston & Karachi
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
C320 (Aftermarket)
C200 spec is the same worldwide.
C230 spec is equally the same. When the C230 nomenclature is used it means the 1800 M271 has a larger blower & more aggressive ECU tune.
In the USA they did not sell cars in C200 trim - only C230. In ROW the sedans were all C200 whereas the Coupe was available as a C230.
All these comments apply to M271 engined cars - not older M111 powered cars where nomenclature reflected capacity.
C230 spec is equally the same. When the C230 nomenclature is used it means the 1800 M271 has a larger blower & more aggressive ECU tune.
In the USA they did not sell cars in C200 trim - only C230. In ROW the sedans were all C200 whereas the Coupe was available as a C230.
All these comments apply to M271 engined cars - not older M111 powered cars where nomenclature reflected capacity.
