Bilstein B4 vs. Sachs OE - On 2001 C320 Sport
Can anyone offer any comparison information between the front OE Sachs struts and the Bilstein B4 replacements?
This would be for a 2001 C320 Sport. I know the part numbers are different for the Sport and Non-Sport Sachs struts, but the Bilstein seem to be the same(F4VNEE170BG).
I am not talking about the Bilstein sports or HD, but just their regular B4 line.
My front struts are severely worn and I am trying to decide on a good replacement. I want the struts to last long, but also perform well. In general, my assumption has been that the any Bilstein strut will be stiffer than OE Sachs, is this true? And on the E class section, I saw someone say that the Bilstein b4 replacements will make the car sit higher for some reason, but perform well.
Most discussion that I could find on the forum were regarding the higher end Bilstein struts, but I couldn't find anything on the B4's. I would love to get the H&R cup kit heavily discussed here, but it isn't in the budget for me right now. I am leaning towards the Bilstein B4's over the stock Sachs, but some of the ride height issues discussed on the E class forum worry me. Can anyone shed some light?
Thanks in advance.
If you think the Sachs suspension is a bit too soft then you should like the Bilstein TCs. Fyi this is for a W203 with sport suspension -- I don't know how these damping rates would feel against non-sport springs, and I imagine The Bilstein TC for other models of Mercedes will have different valving and may feel different altogether.
http://web1.carparts-cat.com/default...8018004&12=140
however you can't buy it anywhere. I bought the non-sport suspension version, 22-141705:
http://web1.carparts-cat.com/default...8018004&12=140
which everyone sells and is listed for both sport and non-sport w203 models. You should note the following differences if you buy these:
- the full extension length of the non-sport strut is longer than the sport strut, presumably by 3/4" which is the difference in ride height between the two cars. This extra extension makes it a bit easier to install the spring and strut mount (you have to compress the spring less), but it also allows the suspension to hang a bit lower when you jack up the car, resulting in your control arm bushings twisting a few degrees more than they normally would. I was a bit worried about this at first, but after close inspection it looks like the bushings don't twist that much overall (15-18 degrees) and the rubber seems to take it with ease.
- The sport sway bar links have a large ball joint bolt than non-sport, so you will have to drill out the bolt holes on the strut housing a bit. I used a 15/32" drill bit.
Maybe that's something with the E class. I did not notice any ride height change on my car. Both front and rear are pressurized, but it takes only 20 pounds or so of pressure to push the pistons down, not enough to lift the car any noticable amount.
And one can actually find them online
Hmm...
Ok... now I'm facing a dilemma because Sachs and Bilstein Sports cost within $5 of each other.
I don't want to go any firmer, because I currently feel almost every crack in the road when driving in the city. Is it because the suspension is firm or because my shocks are shot?
Trending Topics

The Best of Mercedes & AMG
The B4 shock is the one I bought, the black one ... it's the softest of the Bilsteins, is supposed to be valved per stock specs, but in reality comes out a bit stiffer than the actual stock shocks. I still feel cracks in the road, but that's also due to my Conti DW extreme tires that last only 12k miles
. The B4 combined with the DWs gives me a nice tight extremely well handling ride I will find it difficult to part with.I was told that if you want stock feel then go with the Sachs. However if you have DW tires, you'll have to lose those as well, and move to DWS which are supposed to have a much softer sidewall, or the stock ContiSportContact tires that MB sells the cars with (, also hugely expensive.)
The Yellow Bilstein shocks are supposed to be much stiffer than the B4 so I hope those are not the ones you are considering.
Regarding price, the Sachs includes the mounting kit of bolts whereas the Bilstein does not so you have to add another $25 per shock.
I don't know if the above info helps you out ...
Are you sure you are comparing Bilsteins with how the 'new' Sachs felt, not with how the worn-out 80k mile Sachs felt?

Did you try to get the DWS, I have about 5-6/32 tread left on the rears after ~16k miles. I don't really race on the public roads, and feel like they have enough margin for my driving style.
With DW I got about zero tread by 14k

Anyway everybody says our cars are slow, so why bother
With DW I got about zero tread by 14k

Anyway everybody says our cars are slow, so why bother

I should also say that the DWs seem like they are shot by the time the tread is only half gone. They seem to get noisy and hard pretty early on.
lolI am running DWS now. Probably I really do drive like a retard and am not able to feel significant difference between DW and DWS...
I don't think that in everyday driving I am using even 70% of the tires' potential, even when I 'have fun'.
It's illegal and dangerous to race on the road.


I get my tires from Discount Tire/Tire America. They've always been good to deal with for credits. I'll have to pay more attention this next time to see what they give me for the warranty pro-rate.







