4 MATIC is worth or which is the best ?

this is C 300 4 MATIC -sport- !
4 MATIC is like QUADRO in audi means all wheel drive but it is worth if you do not live in Alaska or Sibiria cold-snow

seeing 4 MATIC here only in snow countries but I want to learn technically it is must , + plus worth or - negatif effect with normal C 300 & C 350 ?
power versions of C here ;
C 320 CDI C 300 4 MATIC and C 350
if you are , which one you buy ?
Usually with 4 wheel drive car is a lot heavier and so leads to heavier fuel consumptiom.
Personally I have owned a couple of Audi Quattro's and they are superb at roadholding, but if you are using your car for NORMAL driving then I don't see the point in paying out extra money {IMO}. Spend the extra money on other nice options if you don't really need to have 4WD.
so it really depends on your driving habits and geographic location.


If you live in the States, in New York, im pretty sure you would want a 4MATIC, anywhere where snow falls you want a 4MATIC, luckly i got my car when the snow just started to fall hard in Canada, 4MATIC is well worth it, and plus they last longer than standard cars do. Who knows how good you are at driving manual, you could **** up the transmission. PLus with the 4MATIC in the c300, you get 7 speed tiptronic. IO its well worth it, basically anywhere you live.
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
RWD with a decent set of snow tires can be very effective.
I'm not a huge fan of systems that shift torque using electronics and the individual brakes, they always seem to be one step behind what's going on. I'm happier with a mechanical system, they always seem to me to be more predictable.
When the ML first came out, I had an old fashioned, 4WD (part time, low range transfer case) 4Runner and I consistently got out of stuff that my buddy's ML would sit in and do a little spin/brake/spin stuck dance.
To the OP, 4Matic is great. If you get snow in your area, I'd get it. If you don't get snow or get very little snow, go for the RWD.



