C-Class (W204) 2008 - 2014: C180K, C200K, C230, C280, C300, C350, C200CDI, C220CDI, C320CDI

K&N AIR FILTERS-What results have you had?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 01-28-2014, 01:55 PM
  #1  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
greasykid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: N.C. USA
Posts: 831
Received 13 Likes on 7 Posts
2015, ML250 BlueTEC
K&N AIR FILTERS-What results have you had?

Has anybody installed a K&N in their C250;and if so what were the results. Notice any improvements?
Old 01-28-2014, 03:06 PM
  #2  
Super Moderator

 
Glyn M Ruck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Llandudno, Cape Town, South Africa
Posts: 19,941
Received 175 Likes on 142 Posts
late 2009 CLK 350 Coupe Elegance, '65 Jaguar S Type wires
I do not like K&N air filters. They do a crap job of filtering. Stay with OE.

http://home.roadrunner.com/~jbplock/ISO5011/SPICER.htm

New link ~ other down

http://www.nicoclub.com/archives/kn-vs-oem-filter.html

Last edited by Glyn M Ruck; 11-14-2014 at 07:56 AM.
Old 01-28-2014, 07:39 PM
  #3  
Member
 
xaran's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2012 C 250 Sport Sedan
Originally Posted by Glyn M Ruck
I do not like K&N air filters. They do a crap job of filtering. Stay with OE.

http://home.roadrunner.com/~jbplock/ISO5011/SPICER.htm
That's pretty compelling info against changing to the K&N IMO. Seems the only plus for the K&N type filter is that it is reusable. Using a high quality OEM paper filter is much better filtration and engine protection as well as flow seems pretty close as long as the filter is clean.

Last edited by xaran; 01-29-2014 at 10:58 AM.
Old 01-28-2014, 07:57 PM
  #4  
Super Moderator

 
Glyn M Ruck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Llandudno, Cape Town, South Africa
Posts: 19,941
Received 175 Likes on 142 Posts
late 2009 CLK 350 Coupe Elegance, '65 Jaguar S Type wires
I have more proprietary data by Donaldson proving the same thing that I can't publish.

If you ever get the opportunity to watch the Cummins training film "Operation Hourglass" you should take a look at just how little dirt it takes to ruin an engine. Don't mess with filtration.
The following users liked this post:
floridaorange (04-16-2020)
Old 01-28-2014, 08:17 PM
  #5  
Member
 
WhiteonBlack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: SoCal
Posts: 178
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
2013 C250
I have the bms intake with the k&n filters and honestly i love it! after getting it the throttle response has been a lot better but the sound is amazing too
Old 01-28-2014, 10:49 PM
  #6  
Junior Member
 
adanmtxt1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2012 C250
I've heard enough negative, both on-line and from friends, that I would personally never use K&N. I don't know if it's a dry filter thing or just K&N, but I'd avoid them.
Old 01-29-2014, 02:11 AM
  #7  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
snowmuch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,370
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
C63 AMG
I have them on for about a year now, car feels faster because of the sound. Other than that no complains.
Old 01-29-2014, 10:22 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
W204Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 341
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
08 C-Class (sold)
I have had K&N filters for a few mouths. I get +1 or 2 MPG. Can't tell any power diffence.
Old 01-29-2014, 10:59 AM
  #9  
Super Moderator

 
Glyn M Ruck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Llandudno, Cape Town, South Africa
Posts: 19,941
Received 175 Likes on 142 Posts
late 2009 CLK 350 Coupe Elegance, '65 Jaguar S Type wires
When the engine needs an early rebuild don't cry.
Old 01-29-2014, 10:59 AM
  #10  
Member
 
xaran's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2012 C 250 Sport Sedan
Originally Posted by Glyn M Ruck
I have more proprietary data by Donaldson proving the same thing that I can't publish.

If you ever get the opportunity to watch the Cummins training film "Operation Hourglass" you should take a look at just how little dirt it takes to ruin an engine. Don't mess with filtration.
Ill look for it Glyn. Thanks.

Ive ridden off road bikes and ATV for 40 years and Ive seen many a engine eat itself up in 1 outing due to dirt (sand) getting into it.
Old 01-29-2014, 11:20 AM
  #11  
Super Moderator

 
Glyn M Ruck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Llandudno, Cape Town, South Africa
Posts: 19,941
Received 175 Likes on 142 Posts
late 2009 CLK 350 Coupe Elegance, '65 Jaguar S Type wires
Somewhere between a heaped teaspoon & a tablespoon of dirt is all it takes for an engine to ingest & be ruined.
Old 01-29-2014, 11:35 AM
  #12  
Junior Member
 
ChitownBabyBenz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2009 MB C350 Sport
I used to have modified VW jetta gli with big turbo and all the works. All in all monster that was way faster than my c350.

When it came to do the intake I had to choose what route I wanna go out of 3 options. All 3 set ups (K&N cold air intake, K&N short ram intake and modified stock) were tested on the dyno with data logging. Long story short the best results (most HP and best throttle response) were provided by modified stock set up.

Modified stock consisted of stock paper filter in stock air box in the stock location. Modification included drilling 6" hole on the bottom of the air box and routing PVC plumbing piping from Home Depot (plasti dipped black) from there to behind the lower grill in the front bumper to get as much cool air as possible. Sounds like ghetto rigging but the installation came out very clean and it provided best performance results. I don't even mention how high flow filters let in a lot of crap to the engine. That's another story. No K&N or such (basically all high flow filters) for me in a road going cars or motorcycles.

Last edited by ChitownBabyBenz; 01-29-2014 at 11:38 AM.
Old 01-29-2014, 12:45 PM
  #13  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
thenew3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Central Coast, CA
Posts: 1,283
Received 126 Likes on 105 Posts
2020 X7 xDrive40i, 2016 X3 sDrive28i
The longest I've used a K&N filter in one car was 175k miles. I did not notice any real power or mileage gain during that time. Also didn't have any noticeable engine damage either. After 175k miles the engine still ran smooth as first day I got it with 6 miles on it. That's with 15k mile oil changes. Oil was tested by blackstone labs every other change. This was on a 1999 BMW 328i.
the K&N filter was washed and re-oiled every 25k miles.
Old 01-29-2014, 04:55 PM
  #14  
Super Moderator

 
Glyn M Ruck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Llandudno, Cape Town, South Africa
Posts: 19,941
Received 175 Likes on 142 Posts
late 2009 CLK 350 Coupe Elegance, '65 Jaguar S Type wires
You are probably not in a very dusty environment. K&N filters simply don't filter well for most of their operation.

Thus I will under no circumstances recommend them.
Old 01-29-2014, 04:57 PM
  #15  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
thenew3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Central Coast, CA
Posts: 1,283
Received 126 Likes on 105 Posts
2020 X7 xDrive40i, 2016 X3 sDrive28i
Originally Posted by Glyn M Ruck
You are probably not in a very dusty environment. K&N filters simply don't filter well for most of their operation.

Thus I will under no circumstances recommend them.
Maybe. I don't know what would be considered dusty vs not dusty.

Most of that 175k miles were driven from Massachusetts to Texas and everything in between.

Between the cost of the filter, cost of the cleaner, oil etc, I didn't see much benefit over OEM paper filters, so I've since stopped using K&N in all my other cars.
Old 01-29-2014, 05:00 PM
  #16  
Super Moderator

 
Glyn M Ruck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Llandudno, Cape Town, South Africa
Posts: 19,941
Received 175 Likes on 142 Posts
late 2009 CLK 350 Coupe Elegance, '65 Jaguar S Type wires
Originally Posted by ChitownBabyBenz
I used to have modified VW jetta gli with big turbo and all the works. All in all monster that was way faster than my c350.

When it came to do the intake I had to choose what route I wanna go out of 3 options. All 3 set ups (K&N cold air intake, K&N short ram intake and modified stock) were tested on the dyno with data logging. Long story short the best results (most HP and best throttle response) were provided by modified stock set up.

Modified stock consisted of stock paper filter in stock air box in the stock location. Modification included drilling 6" hole on the bottom of the air box and routing PVC plumbing piping from Home Depot (plasti dipped black) from there to behind the lower grill in the front bumper to get as much cool air as possible. Sounds like ghetto rigging but the installation came out very clean and it provided best performance results. I don't even mention how high flow filters let in a lot of crap to the engine. That's another story. No K&N or such (basically all high flow filters) for me in a road going cars or motorcycles.
No surprise there. IAT makes more difference than any filter could.

I have proven many butt dynos wrong on a proper Schenk Chassis Dyno in a properly controlled enviroment. (temperature, humidity/air density, altitude)
Old 01-29-2014, 05:12 PM
  #17  
Super Moderator

 
Glyn M Ruck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Llandudno, Cape Town, South Africa
Posts: 19,941
Received 175 Likes on 142 Posts
late 2009 CLK 350 Coupe Elegance, '65 Jaguar S Type wires
Originally Posted by thenew3
Maybe. I don't know what would be considered dusty vs not dusty.

Most of that 175k miles were driven from Massachusetts to Texas and everything in between.

Between the cost of the filter, cost of the cleaner, oil etc, I didn't see much benefit over OEM paper filters, so I've since stopped using K&N in all my other cars.
Yeah ~ one or two cases of getting away with less than optimum filtration does not make it the right thing to do.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: K&N AIR FILTERS-What results have you had?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:14 PM.