Please help - C300c v C43c


Thanks in advance
First and foremost, power...then improved handling, power, improved braking, power...notice a trend here?
As Mass said, the C450/43 excels in many areas (he didn't mention the smooth V6 vs a 4 banger). It is more performance focused, vs comfort/luxury for the 300. Have you driven them both?
My sense is that if you are interested in Airmatic, the C43 may not be your cup of tea.
The same question could be asked of the $20k difference between the C43 and C63. It all depends on the value you place on performance vs the other features of the car.
Last edited by flagman; Oct 20, 2016 at 12:53 PM.
The extra money for the C450 would have gotten me better performance (which I didn't care about) and a less comfortable ride, which I did care about.
I also found the exhaust note of the C450 to become grating after a few minutes, and inescapable on the highway. I've had the 300 for six months, no regrets vs the 450.
Long story short, you get all the stuff listed as legit AMG-performed upgrades for only $2K above the C400 4Matic.....a frickin steal. So for 9K over the 4-banger 300? You should jump all over that sh-- with no regret. Think about it. Pick a few C300 options and you're damn near @ 50K.
EXCERPT: Forever unworthy of the AMG badge for one reason (no hand-built powertrain originating in Affalterbach)......while being absolutely worthy for 5-10 (count the upgrades from the C400 4matic, all done for only a couple thou. in base price increase). And no, I've nothing but the 450 on my rear; I like the barely noticeable baby AMGs only on the front fenders.
Think I'm talking crazy? Note the upgrades or enhancements placing it squarely between the 400 and 63:
- Engine (increased boost/power upgrade),
- Exhaust (performance & sound upgrade + quad tips),
- Brakes (C63-spec 14.2" front upgrade for sure, 12.5" rear...I think; not sure what the C400 has)
- Added 4matic unavailable on the C63, as well as the 67/33 tweak from the C400's 55/45,
- C63's hand-me-down variable ratio steering, (NOT COMPLAINING!)
- C63's hand-me-down 3-stage adjustable dampers (NOT HERE EITHER),
- C63's hand-me-down body work/cosmetic sport package - front & rear (NO HERE)
- Diamond grille upgrade
- Suspension: From the C400, it's retuned with more negative camber to enhance roadholding. Also, stiffer springs, bushings and steering knuckles tighten its body control and sharpen its response.[I]
I was worried about the C450's suspension as well (I think the C43 has the same suspension as C450). I am very happy about the suspension in comfort mode, I find it too "bouncy" sometimes and have to put it on Sport mode for high speed cruising. I use comfort around the streets in the city and it does well.
Get the C43/C450 IMHO.
Trending Topics


The consensus seems to be that the AMG is definitely worth the added cost . I'm looking at a C300 cabrio for $72K versus a C43 cabrio for $80K . I'm definitely wanting the C43 ( I currently drive and love a 2014 C350 ), the only possible negatives are stiff suspension and exhaust drone ,both of which will hopefully be eliminated after a test drive .
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
aside from all the benefits listed so far..
There is substantial untapped torque and power available in the v6 with stage 1 tune where as the 4cyl is already wound up fairly high and would require hardware to make note able grounds with..
Persoanlly I'd avoid the Cabrio though as the chassis flex and resulting creaks and groans with AMG suspension would drive me nuts... So I'd go the coupe..
my personal plan will be to go to a C43 wagon once I am done with this c300 AMG pack wagon..


Regarding the chassis flex , all the reports /videos I've seen on this vehicle indicate that unlike most cabrios , this one is as stiff and draft free as the coupe .




