Cls 63 Vs Gallardo Se

Why only TREZ63 gets all the love?

Ahhh.... it must be because I have '89 tercel listed... LOL.
But I'm sensing something is missing here....
Not sure about TREZ63.... I think all MBWorld-ers (the fantasy islanders
) just don't believe G would rape CLS like the video suggests.But TREZ63, the difference in outcome you suggested was basically it wouldn't be a rape.... just a slow walk.... like how 0.5-sec difference in 1/4 should look like. Am I right? Correct me if I'm wrong...
So AJ, stop talking who's winning or losing.... or which one is faster or slower.... on average... CLS is slower... so CLS will lose...
But do you think ~0.5-sec difference in 1/4 based on dragtimes would result in a rape the video shows?
Answer me answer me answer me.....

It takes more than 0.5-sec difference in 1/4 to make the video plausible.

Why only TREZ63 gets all the love?

Ahhh.... it must be because I have '89 tercel listed... LOL.
But I'm sensing something is missing here....
Not sure about TREZ63.... I think all MBWorld-ers (the fantasy islanders
) just don't believe G would rape CLS like the video suggests.But TREZ63, the difference in outcome you suggested was basically it wouldn't be a rape.... just a slow walk.... like how 0.5-sec difference in 1/4 should look like. Am I right? Correct me if I'm wrong...
So AJ, stop talking who's winning or losing.... or which one is faster or slower.... on average... CLS is slower... so CLS will lose...
But do you think ~0.5-sec difference in 1/4 based on dragtimes would result in a rape the video shows?
Answer me answer me answer me.....

It takes more than 0.5-sec difference in 1/4 to make the video plausible.
Last edited by AJGlobal; Aug 17, 2007 at 06:17 PM.
Yes, I agree that drag times does not show complete information about a car. A car may be fast in first 1/4 but slower in 2nd 1/4. Just like comparing E55 to E63 or E60 M5... which both of the latter cars (E63 and E60 M5) are believed to be faster than E55 above 100mph due to better gearing and higher HP.
But the point here is not about drag times.... and most of all, the question here is not about which ones faster or slower.... I for one support you that G is faster (assuming similarly skilled drivers).
Here's why I don't think the video is plausible for stock CLS63 vs. stock G:
In order to have the results the video shows, the G has to be A LOT (and I mean A LOT) faster than your CLS63.
I saw a similar video where modded 996TT murdered a stock M6 (http://media.putfile.com/TT-and-M6-68). How 996TT moves relative to M6 is approximately similar to how the G moves relative to your CLS63.
Assuming from and to speed between the two races are similar, the relationship of 1/4-mile numbers should be pretty close also.
And we know that the modded 996TT shown in the video above puts 10.6 in 1/4... and we know that stock M6 puts ~12.5 in 1/4. This means in order to achieve the result the G did to your car, the G must be ~2 seconds faster than CLS63.
This is where it's hard to believe....
Drag times show G is only faster by 0.5-sec than CLS63. So either your CLS is a lot slower than what is found in dragtimes or the G is a lot faster than what is found in dragtimes.
Since you own the CLS63 and you're pretty damn sure your CLS63 is healthy, then my next guess is the G is modded.
Do you know for sure that Alan's G is not modded?
Alan may have claimed his G is not modded.... but we believe his car is no longer stock.
So if it's not stock... then yeah, I believe the outcome.
The fairness of the video is questionable. We are based on the assumption that it's a stock G.... as TREZ has suggested, given typical results, it must've been a staged race or driver's error or unhealthy CLS or modded G.
And all four of them have been denied by AJ, while we believe at least one of them did happen. This is IMO the start of sticky arguments
It's not about who's winning or losing.
Yes, I agree that drag times does not show complete information about a car. A car may be fast in first 1/4 but slower in 2nd 1/4. Just like comparing E55 to E63 or E60 M5... which both of the latter cars (E63 and E60 M5) are believed to be faster than E55 above 100mph due to better gearing and higher HP.
But the point here is not about drag times.... and most of all, the question here is not about which ones faster or slower.... I for one support you that G is faster (assuming similarly skilled drivers).
Here's why I don't think the video is plausible for stock CLS63 vs. stock G:
In order to have the results the video shows, the G has to be A LOT (and I mean A LOT) faster than your CLS63.
I saw a similar video where modded 996TT murdered a stock M6 (http://media.putfile.com/TT-and-M6-68). How 996TT moves relative to M6 is approximately similar to how the G moves relative to your CLS63.
Assuming from and to speed between the two races are similar, the relationship of 1/4-mile numbers should be pretty close also.
And we know that the modded 996TT shown in the video above puts 10.6 in 1/4... and we know that stock M6 puts ~12.5 in 1/4. This means in order to achieve the result the G did to your car, the G must be ~2 seconds faster than CLS63.
This is where it's hard to believe....
Drag times show G is only faster by 0.5-sec than CLS63. So either your CLS is a lot slower than what is found in dragtimes or the G is a lot faster than what is found in dragtimes.
Since you own the CLS63 and you're pretty damn sure your CLS63 is healthy, then my next guess is the G is modded.
Do you know for sure that Alan's G is not modded?
Alan may have claimed his G is not modded.... but we believe his car is no longer stock.
So if it's not stock... then yeah, I believe the outcome.
Like Bi turbo said...........they are all fast cars and everyone's outcomes can different, but I ran him 3 times and one of the races I actually jumped on him and he still flew by me. I guess me owning all the cars in question and showing the video on top of the all the HP and weight info is not enough. There must be some conspiracy going on.


I once raced a C5 Z06 on my W210 E55 years ago.... C5 Z06 should be mid to high 12's and W210 E55 should be low to mid 13's. It wasn't a rape.... C5 Z06 just slowly but surely walked me.
If this holds true, it means SL65 should do similar thing to G, then (0.5-sec difference in 1/4).
And FYI, in one thread, Alan didn't even want to admit the SL65 is faster than G.**EDIT**
BTW, if you put your CLS & Spyder side by side... I want to see whether it could also *** your CLS.
One suggestion: Dyno your CLS.... I'm not convinced your CLS is healthy.... there's one member here w/ a CLS63 or E63 that could only get mid 13's in 1/4. If your CLS is also like that, then yeah.... the video is what it is. Just a friendly suggestion in case you don't realize how much faster your CLS should be.
Last edited by otoupalik; Aug 18, 2007 at 01:04 PM. Reason: please watch your language
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
A) Gallardo was highly modified
B) CLS was a 550 not a 63
C) CLS63 was in C mode and at the top of its band for the gear
D) Video was staged
E) Your particular CLS is ill and needs to go in for service.
Dragtimes don't lie my friend. I am sure we can arrange a race between a G-car and a 63 in the coming weeks.
BTW, saying that you don't want to race on the strip and you want "real" street race condition makes you sound like an idiot, have you even been to a drag strip before? What is not realy about it? The fact that they measure the time for you? Or the fact that your Gallardo would lose to my CLS63?
Set it up tre- my cls is pretty healthy, I would love to race that audi
I would be willing to bet his Spyder would get beaten by either Sam or Trez
If this race was not staged, then the guy really should have his car looked at. He likely has the faulty TB and bad software, TCU failure.
I once raced a C5 Z06 on my W210 E55 years ago.... C5 Z06 should be mid to high 12's and W210 E55 should be low to mid 13's. It wasn't a rape.... C5 Z06 just slowly but surely walked me.
If this holds true, it means SL65 should do similar thing to G, then (0.5-sec difference in 1/4).
And FYI, in one thread, Alan didn't even want to admit the SL65 is faster than G.**EDIT**
BTW, if you put your CLS & Spyder side by side... I want to see whether it could also rape your CLS.
One suggestion: Dyno your CLS.... I'm not convinced your CLS is healthy.... there's one member here w/ a CLS63 or E63 that could only get mid 13's in 1/4. If your CLS is also like that, then yeah.... the video is what it is. Just a friendly suggestion in case you don't realize how much faster your CLS should be.
Zoink, good logical posts..
Guy likely is answering you less cause he wanted to egg on the 63 crowd with this bogus video.
I have vids of the CLS on the A** of the new Gallardo, I have raced one coming home from Vegas, no way this car could lose me like what is shown in this video.
I will run a 12.3@116 at MIR, I am very confident records will be broken at the East Coast venue
Talking about this video, how its fixed, the car is ill, the driver is bad, is going no where.
Hopefully we see some MBs.
Think I'm full of it? look at Jay's 600 destroying the almighty M's and L's. Take a hike trolls, a M6 couldn't beat my BONE STOCK '06 from a 65 mph freeway roll.
Last edited by Fast55; Aug 18, 2007 at 02:37 AM.
Anyway, I gotta be at DemoDays in like 7 hours so I'll post up tomorrow.
It may or may not have been staged, it doesn't matter. It isn't worth the gas money to find out.
Last edited by IngenereAMG; Aug 18, 2007 at 04:31 AM.
Anyway, I gotta be at DemoDays in like 7 hours so I'll post up tomorrow.
Life is so funny......
So I am headed home from work and , UH OH could it be a
Lamborghini .. LOL, I fumbled my camera to the floor, picked it up and followed this guy for 15 minutes. We did several small short bursts down Melrose and onto La Cienega continuing to Wilshire. My car stayed right with the Lambo. Maybe you have to be rolling to get slaughtered by the Audi 10
I have no idea what kind this was but no way this car was gonna produce the result previously posted by mr. Lambo
Its long the burst occurs at 1:50 ish.. I was filming and driving so well the camera was dropped a few times and I missed a shift but what is most interesting is the 63 sounds just as LOUD as the whatever Lambo I was running next to. And YOU CAN HEAR my car when going WOT enjoy
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-A3XKwDP-jA
Last edited by juicee63; Aug 18, 2007 at 12:34 PM.
So I am headed home from work and , UH OH could it be a
Lamborghini .. LOL, I fumbled my camera to the floor, picked it up and followed this guy for 15 minutes. We did several small short bursts down Melrose and onto La Cienega continuing to Wilshire. My car stayed right with the Lambo. Maybe you have to be rolling to get slaughtered by the Audi 10
I have no idea what kind this was but no way this car was gonna produce the result previously posted by mr. Lambo
Its long the burst occurs at 1:50 ish.. I was filming and driving so well the camera was dropped a few times and I missed a shift but what is most interesting is the 63 sounds just as LOUD as the whatever Lambo I was running next to. And YOU CAN HEAR my car when going WOT enjoy
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-A3XKwDP-jA
working on the edit of the other 3 runs. I am certain later today we will be barraged with CLS going to slaughter vids. I am just glad mr. Lamb did not claim the vid was me in my car. Looks like AJ has the 030 package as well. Man this guys car needs a mechanic





