New Tires for C55
#1
New Tires for C55
I have done some searches on the boards here and wanted to get some more input on the best replacement tire for the OEM Perrelli Rosso tire that came on my car new. My current rear tires are about shot at 10,000 miles. The fronts look like thay could go another 8,000 miles. Should I stay with the Perrelli or buy 4 new tires of another brand/model?
I have experience with PS2's and they are quiet and pretty sticky. They seem to wear prematurely on the outside shoulder since they tread depth on the outside shoulder starts out several millimeters shallower than the center grooves. An on top of that add a caster settting by MB that generally wears tires quickly and the PS2's have a short life. My last set of PS2's on my CLK 430 were bald on the outside shoulder and had lots of life on the rest of the tire. MB said the alignment was within spec.
I am looking for a quite summer tire that wears pretty flat across the entire tire. Anything new offered to consider in my purchase decision?
Thanks for your input!
I have experience with PS2's and they are quiet and pretty sticky. They seem to wear prematurely on the outside shoulder since they tread depth on the outside shoulder starts out several millimeters shallower than the center grooves. An on top of that add a caster settting by MB that generally wears tires quickly and the PS2's have a short life. My last set of PS2's on my CLK 430 were bald on the outside shoulder and had lots of life on the rest of the tire. MB said the alignment was within spec.
I am looking for a quite summer tire that wears pretty flat across the entire tire. Anything new offered to consider in my purchase decision?
Thanks for your input!
#2
solution
Sorry, I don't have a solution for you, but maybe something that will make you laugh.
Instead of getting new tires, go to the podiatrist and get the extra weight taken out of your right foot.
I've found that to be my problem, not the tires.
~~~~
Took a friend out Saturday - let him drive. We came to a crossover on a highway. I said 'remember high school days?'. I told him to turn the wheels slighly and gun it. Turned off traction control.
After 75 yards of rubber on the road, he let off and said Holy ****! That was fun.
I said yeah, that just cost me $60 bucks (tires).
Instead of getting new tires, go to the podiatrist and get the extra weight taken out of your right foot.
I've found that to be my problem, not the tires.
~~~~
Took a friend out Saturday - let him drive. We came to a crossover on a highway. I said 'remember high school days?'. I told him to turn the wheels slighly and gun it. Turned off traction control.
After 75 yards of rubber on the road, he let off and said Holy ****! That was fun.
I said yeah, that just cost me $60 bucks (tires).
![naughty](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/naughty.gif)
#4
I assume you're not looking for all-season tires.
The "hot" tire for pure performance is the Yokohama Advan Neova. It seems to be topping all the usual characters in tests. I'm thinking they might be my next tires. They may not be optimal if you favor long life or quiet ride.
Picture is below.
The "hot" tire for pure performance is the Yokohama Advan Neova. It seems to be topping all the usual characters in tests. I'm thinking they might be my next tires. They may not be optimal if you favor long life or quiet ride.
Picture is below.
![](http://www.tirerack.com/images/tires/yokohama/yo_advan_neova_ad07_1000.jpg)
Last edited by Fifth Ring; 05-11-2007 at 09:02 AM.
#6
I would actually be willing to go a bit under on size (e.g. I could go with 235/40/17s). The 10mm variation is probably smaller than the variation between manufacturers' nominal sizes.
That said, it looks like there's nothing close to a 255/35/18.
That said, it looks like there's nothing close to a 255/35/18.
Trending Topics
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
C32 AMG - in Pewter
I am in the process of selecting front tires for my C32 and have narrowed my choice to the Goodyear F1 GS-D3. The reasons:
* did not want tire that has exceptional grip but is not quiet
* did not want tire that looses significant grip at half way its life
* did not want tire that becomes loud at half way its life
* wanted tire with decent tread ware
Read a bit about tires on this forum and reviews on Tire Tack, but have no personal experience with performance tires, aside from my winter tires (excellent set btw).
* did not want tire that has exceptional grip but is not quiet
* did not want tire that looses significant grip at half way its life
* did not want tire that becomes loud at half way its life
* wanted tire with decent tread ware
Read a bit about tires on this forum and reviews on Tire Tack, but have no personal experience with performance tires, aside from my winter tires (excellent set btw).
#10
MBworld Guru
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Diamond Bar, CA
Posts: 22,007
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
white and whiter
GS-D3 is the best bargain for spending over $800 on tires. if you are looking for something cheaper I would recommand hankook k104 for price range around $650. want even cheaper? General Exlaim UHP.
if you want to correct the problem with the front tire wearing on the outer edge you might want to look into the camber kits because no matter what you do the stock setup will wear out the tire faster on the outer edge. The only other way is to flip the tire side-to-side once a while to keep the tire life longer.
if you want to correct the problem with the front tire wearing on the outer edge you might want to look into the camber kits because no matter what you do the stock setup will wear out the tire faster on the outer edge. The only other way is to flip the tire side-to-side once a while to keep the tire life longer.
#11
Almost a Member!
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'06 C55 AMG; '07 ML63 AMG
On both of my C55's I replaced the P-Zero Rosso's with my personal favorite performance tire, the old stand-by Michelin Pilot Sport (NOT PS2's). The Pilot Sports are, IMO, the best overall tire for the C55, especially if you go one size up in the rear to 255's. Love 'em.
![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Last edited by smackjack; 05-15-2007 at 12:03 PM.
#12
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,064
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
C55 AMG, 135i, 911 GT3, GLE43 AMG
On both of my C55's I replaced the P-Zero Rosso's with my personal favorite performance tire, the old stand-by Michelin Pilot Sport (NOT PS2's). The Pilot Sports are, IMO, the best overall tire for the C55, especially if you go one size up in the rear to 255's. Love 'em.
![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
If anybody else has suggestions for a good tire for occasional track use and everyday use, let me know.
#13
uh ps2's are wayyy better than rossos or the other Michelin's mentioned. Simply do a comparison on the tire rack's website or better yet check the sticky thread that is now current ranking the 07 tires by tire rack in that forum-
#14
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,064
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
C55 AMG, 135i, 911 GT3, GLE43 AMG
It seems you really can't go wrong with Michelin PS2's, other than price......so I'm probably going to get them for my car.
Here is another question for the track junkies here. Do you think there is an advantage in going to wider front and/or rear tires over the stock size in terms of track performance/grip? I don't care about looks, but I wouldn't mind having a slight edge in grip IF slightly wider tires will make a noticeable difference.
I'm sure all of you know, but the stock C55 tires are 225/40 R18 in the front, and 245/35 R18 in the rear. I'm going to stick with the stock AMG 18" rims (7.5" wide front and 8.5" wide rear).
Here is another question for the track junkies here. Do you think there is an advantage in going to wider front and/or rear tires over the stock size in terms of track performance/grip? I don't care about looks, but I wouldn't mind having a slight edge in grip IF slightly wider tires will make a noticeable difference.
I'm sure all of you know, but the stock C55 tires are 225/40 R18 in the front, and 245/35 R18 in the rear. I'm going to stick with the stock AMG 18" rims (7.5" wide front and 8.5" wide rear).
#15
It seems you really can't go wrong with Michelin PS2's, other than price......so I'm probably going to get them for my car.
Here is another question for the track junkies here. Do you think there is an advantage in going to wider front and/or rear tires over the stock size in terms of track performance/grip? I don't care about looks, but I wouldn't mind having a slight edge in grip IF slightly wider tires will make a noticeable difference.
I'm sure all of you know, but the stock C55 tires are 225/40 R18 in the front, and 245/35 R18 in the rear. I'm going to stick with the stock AMG 18" rims (7.5" wide front and 8.5" wide rear).
Here is another question for the track junkies here. Do you think there is an advantage in going to wider front and/or rear tires over the stock size in terms of track performance/grip? I don't care about looks, but I wouldn't mind having a slight edge in grip IF slightly wider tires will make a noticeable difference.
I'm sure all of you know, but the stock C55 tires are 225/40 R18 in the front, and 245/35 R18 in the rear. I'm going to stick with the stock AMG 18" rims (7.5" wide front and 8.5" wide rear).
#16
You have no rubbing with 245's??? What about with the offset difference???? The rears are 34 and there is no issue? what tires are you running 245's? you running 245/35 or 30?? Thanks I have been thinking about doing the same. Although I run 255's rear.
#17
I thought about going up the 255s in back, but I kind of like being able to rotate tires front-to-back.
Picture below.
![](http://i124.photobucket.com/albums/p11/gcirillo/VIR%202007/VIRApril2007020.jpg)
Last edited by Fifth Ring; 05-15-2007 at 03:08 PM.
#18
Rotating the tires is definitely clutch, I just wanted more traction. I didn't realize they were 17's. I wonder if I were to do the same with the c55's 18's if they would rub. I would suspect they would given the 4mm offset outside v. what MB performance salon recommends as well as running 245 v. 235 on an 18, but dunno??
#19
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 2,469
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
C55AMG W203; 330i E90
My C55 is now ~39000km, I changed to PS/2 from the stock Rosso at 15000km. Until now, not any signs of these PS/2 are wearing. Your bad experience with PS/2 could be the heavier car CLK430 and/or incorrect tire pressure. Just my guess. My experience with PS/2 is they are fairly durable.
#20
Rotating the tires is definitely clutch, I just wanted more traction. I didn't realize they were 17's. I wonder if I were to do the same with the c55's 18's if they would rub. I would suspect they would given the 4mm offset outside v. what MB performance salon recommends as well as running 245 v. 235 on an 18, but dunno??
#22
Also fwiw. I am currently running the 225 contis front and p zero's rear 255. I bumped the pressure up to CLK63 spec 40/45 and am running EUR alignment settings along with front negative camber bolts which give about .6 negative if that. I went on a canyon run and checked tire temps F&R and they were even across the track and the handling was fairly neutral
I have the matching p zero fronts coming in tomorrow and the car should be even better.
I would have thought that the car would handle like **** with the greater pressure but the handling and balance is better.
FWIW I have experimented with lower pressure up front to make the front end understeer less (a few pounds lower than stock) and while it would understeer less, the turn in was sloppy as hell, which is what most feel and assume that it handles worse although it will grip better when driven properly. I then started bumping the rear pressure up and it was more neutral yet still.
I then test drove a clk63 and loved the balance. I noted that it does run a 8" front and 8.5r but that it runs 225/255 setup. I decided to mimic this hence the clk63 pressure. I like it!
![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
I would have thought that the car would handle like **** with the greater pressure but the handling and balance is better.
FWIW I have experimented with lower pressure up front to make the front end understeer less (a few pounds lower than stock) and while it would understeer less, the turn in was sloppy as hell, which is what most feel and assume that it handles worse although it will grip better when driven properly. I then started bumping the rear pressure up and it was more neutral yet still.
I then test drove a clk63 and loved the balance. I noted that it does run a 8" front and 8.5r but that it runs 225/255 setup. I decided to mimic this hence the clk63 pressure. I like it!