A turning point in Mercedes tuning...Performance Supercharger Pulley
#826
I have been reading this thread from the beginning until I realised the pully, air intake etc. was only for the c32!
I have a c180k coupe. What can be done to get more power other than a re-map?
Thanks.
I have a c180k coupe. What can be done to get more power other than a re-map?
Thanks.
#829
Newbie
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
02 SLK32 AMG
I just received my C3P pulley, intake, and belt wrap kit today. Everything installed properly with no issues during my test drive. I am putting it on the dyno tomorrow morning. If A/F ratio looks good, I will probably hold off on the LET tune for a month or two.
#830
Super Member
So what were your numbers? Thanks
#831
Newbie
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
02 SLK32 AMG
Came back with 290.3 rwhp and 291.2 torque @ approx. 5800 rpm. Measured using Dyno Dynamics at 6,000 feet above sea level. I intend to re-dyno at another shop. The guy at the shop I went to didn't impress me with his technical abilities.
#833
Super Member
I don't get it? what is the difference with this dyno dynamics? It produces lower numbers i take it, but that seems really low, or isnt it? especially with those bolt-ons that suppose to give +- another 35RWHP ? I mean we dont have these different types of dyno's that people talk about on here, like mustang etc.. all i know i stock my car put down 305RWHP but like i so not sure what to reference it with your dyno's over there... Anyway I suppose will just have to put it back on the same dyno after mods are done to see the diff. As a matter of interest what was your rwhp. before the mod before 290rwhp?
#835
MBWorld Fanatic!
This will give additional reference and I'm in CA.
https://mbworld.org/forums/c32-amg-c55-amg-w203/293372-my-code3-pulley-dyno.html
#837
Newbie
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
02 SLK32 AMG
I don't get it? what is the difference with this dyno dynamics? It produces lower numbers i take it, but that seems really low, or isnt it? especially with those bolt-ons that suppose to give +- another 35RWHP ? I mean we dont have these different types of dyno's that people talk about on here, like mustang etc.. all i know i stock my car put down 305RWHP but like i so not sure what to reference it with your dyno's over there... Anyway I suppose will just have to put it back on the same dyno after mods are done to see the diff. As a matter of interest what was your rwhp. before the mod before 290rwhp?
Regarding the difference between a Dyno Dynamics and others, I simply do not know. I do know that some dynos are more generous with their horsepower and torque readings than others. The biggest influence with the numbers I posted is the high altitude.
Here's my dyno printout - everything looks good; no unexplained dips or spikes...love the torque
Last edited by 02SLK32AMG; 04-27-2009 at 11:26 PM. Reason: added pic
#838
Numbers are numbers and shouldn't be looked at with too much concern. Changes in weather temp, humidity, engine heat soak, and how the car is strapped to the dyno all effect the readings. If the car is strapped really tight or a hair sideways on the dyno the numbers go down. The only thing of real value is the AFR. 12.5 to 11.7 at the motor and you're fine. I prefer 11.7 at the motor which is about 12.3 at the tail pipe.
Dyno's help show the increase from a different mod but to be accurate need to really be done the same day.
Dyno's help show the increase from a different mod but to be accurate need to really be done the same day.
#839
Member
Is this thread still alive? I've purchased the pulley and intake mod 10 days ago but still have not a word from Brandon. My e-mails are just ignored
Maybe it's time to contact PayPal and see if can get money back
Maybe it's time to contact PayPal and see if can get money back
#840
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Isla Verde, Puerto Rico
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
SRT-6
My pulley from Code 3 took 2 weeks to arrive to Puerto Rico. I got an email that my ordered was received and another with the tracking number when it shipped. I have it installed and so far I'm pleased. The backing plate clearance to the clutch wasn't symmetrical (not too far off) but has worn square after 2 days of use. No belt slipping, now unusual noise and 16.5 lbs maximum boost so far. (dashdaq) The out of round condition seems to be prevalent on the aluminum pulleys so get a steel one.
The track is open Wednesday and Thursday and if the weather cooperates I should have new best times to share.
Les
The track is open Wednesday and Thursday and if the weather cooperates I should have new best times to share.
Les
#841
Super Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: san jose, ca
Posts: 510
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
2002 C32 1987 190E 2.3 334K miles and going
I didn't dyno my car before installing my Code3 mods. I should have, but my schedule just didn't provide the opportunity.
Regarding the difference between a Dyno Dynamics and others, I simply do not know. I do know that some dynos are more generous with their horsepower and torque readings than others. The biggest influence with the numbers I posted is the high altitude.
Here's my dyno printout - everything looks good; no unexplained dips or spikes...love the torque
Regarding the difference between a Dyno Dynamics and others, I simply do not know. I do know that some dynos are more generous with their horsepower and torque readings than others. The biggest influence with the numbers I posted is the high altitude.
Here's my dyno printout - everything looks good; no unexplained dips or spikes...love the torque
https://mbworld.org/forums/3231330-post15.html
#843
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Keesler AFB, Gulfport, MS
Posts: 1,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
C32 AMG
Pure speculation but, I would venture to say it's due to their complete lack of customer support, complaints from members across the boards, orders not filled or delayed much longer than expexted, and then the issues with the intercooler being the icing on the cake. That's definitely enough for them to lose their sponsorship at least. Sounds like there has been a lot going on behind the scenes as well.
#844
Super Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: FT POLK LOUISIANA
Posts: 691
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1992 Toyota Corolla, 1994 Chevy C1500, 2002 C32, 2012 Prius, 2013 Toyota Sienna
ooooh yea....
Pure speculation but, I would venture to say it's due to their complete lack of customer support, complaints from members across the boards, orders not filled or delayed much longer than expexted, and then the issues with the intercooler being the icing on the cake. That's definitely enough for them to lose their sponsorship at least. Sounds like there has been a lot going on behind the scenes as well.
#847
Super Member
#848
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Isla Verde, Puerto Rico
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
SRT-6
I installed mine recently. (2006 SRT-6) Aluminum pulley, no belt wrap kit. I went to the track and ran a hair faster (13.0141) than my previous best (13.074). Most runs were much slower. I lost traction in first every single run around 4500 rpm and the car pulled timing and shifted early to second; lost traction in second at around 5500 rpm and the car again pulled timing and shifted early to third. No traction loss in third and the shift to fourth was at 6050 rpm. So, the car feels faster, breaks the tires loose (PS2's) no matter how careful I am and runs the same or slower. I ran 13.5 to 13.7 several times feathering the throttle all the way to third trying to find the right balance. I started the rear tires at 32 lbs. and went progressively lower until I reached 20 lbs. The best traction was at 28 to 30 lbs. Needless to say, I'm shopping for tires. Maximum boost that I saw on the Dashdaq was 16.9 psi. I think the pulley is a good deal if you can get one without problems. And its on sale right now. Why couldn't I have waited and saved a Benjamin and Jefferson.
Les
Les
#849
Senior Member
ok so i tried to read this thread and its too long to read the whole thing. im trying to find the best bang for the bucks and nobody have said it black and white. is CODE 3 worth it or not ? as far as more power and product reliability
#850
Member
So, IMO the C3 is worth it for the price and easy install. I had the 2nd generation pulley and had no issues at all while it was on my car. But I think the 185 pulley is definitely the way to go if you want the most power out of your car for just a few more hundred bucks. Cant go wrong either way