C32 AMG, C55 AMG (W203) 2001 - 2007

82mm TB for C55

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 05-29-2009, 07:49 PM
  #1  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
AMGSC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: So Cal
Posts: 2,347
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2006 Weistec 3.0L SC'd C55, 2006 MaxPsi PT6466 Turbo'd M3, 2019 Maserati GTS , 2020Alfa Quadrifoglio
82mm TB for C55

I'm having an 82mm TB installed on my car by Vadim. He told me if there is enough demand that he would make a kit out of it which includes a custom intake system to match the much wider diameter.

Not sure if NA'd C55s would be interested but it would sure pair up well with Hooley's long-tube development. More air in, More air out.

Any interest? Stock TB is 74mm. Big difference in how the car will breathe.

Last edited by AMGSC; 05-29-2009 at 08:15 PM.
Old 05-29-2009, 08:04 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Hercules86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sclass
Can u find out if it works on a s500 since i think the tb on both na cars are the same if im not wrong.

Pm me info im interested
Old 05-29-2009, 08:07 PM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
AMGSC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: So Cal
Posts: 2,347
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2006 Weistec 3.0L SC'd C55, 2006 MaxPsi PT6466 Turbo'd M3, 2019 Maserati GTS , 2020Alfa Quadrifoglio
Originally Posted by Hercules86
Can u find out if it works on a s500 since i think the tb on both na cars are the same if im not wrong.

Pm me info im interested
I'll post pics when it's done. As of now only Renntech started selling the 82mm TB kit but the price is ridiculous. Mine cost less than half of that.
Old 05-29-2009, 08:09 PM
  #4  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
moosejaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,692
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
none
Agreed the price is insane
Is the 82mm the one they use on the V-12?
Old 05-29-2009, 09:24 PM
  #5  
Moderator Alumni
 
TruTaing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 3,255
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 7 Posts
w203 m112
Just curious, is the opening into the intake manifold (where the tb mounts) on the NA m113s 82mm?

The opening on the m112 intake manifold is only 74mm, hence the recent movement for 74mm throttle bodies on NA m112s.

I figured the intake manifold would be similar between the NA m112s and m113s? This would also imply that the NA m113's ID on the MAF is larger than the 74mm ID on the NA m112 MAF also?

Last edited by TruTaing; 05-29-2009 at 09:27 PM.
Old 05-29-2009, 09:27 PM
  #6  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Tump43's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Posts: 1,001
Received 34 Likes on 27 Posts
2014 E350 4Matic
I'm down for a for an 82mm throttle body for my NA C55. What happened to the promised enlarged throttle body for the C55 from AMS? If Vadim's got it everything's good!
Old 05-29-2009, 09:41 PM
  #7  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
AMGSC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: So Cal
Posts: 2,347
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2006 Weistec 3.0L SC'd C55, 2006 MaxPsi PT6466 Turbo'd M3, 2019 Maserati GTS , 2020Alfa Quadrifoglio
Originally Posted by TruTaing
Just curious, is the opening into the intake manifold (where the tb mounts) on the NA m113s 82mm?

The opening on the m112 intake manifold is only 74mm, hence the recent movement for 74mm throttle bodies on NA m112s.

I figured the intake manifold would be similar between the NA m112s and m113s? This would also imply that the NA m113's ID on the MAF is larger than the 74mm ID on the NA m112 MAF also?
Here is a pic of the C55 stock TB opening....
Attached Thumbnails 82mm TB for C55-c55_tb_opening.jpg  
Old 05-29-2009, 09:43 PM
  #8  
Moderator Alumni
 
TruTaing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 3,255
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 7 Posts
w203 m112
I guess my questions aren't so much for the sake of the C55 crowd. Ive always been curious as to what parts would be interchangeable with the NA m112.

I'm no pro at this, but how much sense does it make to make your throttle body larger than your MAF's ID?

How large IS the stock ID of the MAF on the C55 (m113)?

Originally Posted by AMGSC
Here is a pic of the C55 stock TB opening....
Ya posted at the same time I posted. I cant quite read that pic, what are the numbers on it? Thanks!

edit: wait... we know the stock tb is 74mm, how big is the ID of the MAF? Thanks again...

Last edited by TruTaing; 05-29-2009 at 09:45 PM.
Old 05-29-2009, 10:29 PM
  #9  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
AMGSC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: So Cal
Posts: 2,347
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2006 Weistec 3.0L SC'd C55, 2006 MaxPsi PT6466 Turbo'd M3, 2019 Maserati GTS , 2020Alfa Quadrifoglio
Originally Posted by TruTaing
I guess my questions aren't so much for the sake of the C55 crowd. Ive always been curious as to what parts would be interchangeable with the NA m112.

I'm no pro at this, but how much sense does it make to make your throttle body larger than your MAF's ID?

How large IS the stock ID of the MAF on the C55 (m113)?



Ya posted at the same time I posted. I cant quite read that pic, what are the numbers on it? Thanks!

edit: wait... we know the stock tb is 74mm, how big is the ID of the MAF? Thanks again...
The reading is 82.xx. I can't read the third and fourth digits either. The stock opening looks to be 78mm so the MAF would match that unless Vadim replaces the MAF also. I'll give him a call to verify.
Old 05-29-2009, 10:44 PM
  #10  
Former Vendor of MBWorld
 
hooleyboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Glendale Arizona
Posts: 3,193
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
C55,SL55,C63
How will an 82mm throttle body fit on the intake manifold? I just happen to have a few of these sitting around. My garage is turning into a Mercedes used parts depot.

Old 05-29-2009, 11:50 PM
  #11  
Former Vendor of MBWorld
 
AMS Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,935
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
AMG
You can only go as large as the intake manifold opening itself. Some Mercedes have a much bigger opening on the intake manifold than the throttle body, others don't and are pretty much the same. You could always machine the opening but that's labor intensive and costly.

Furthermore, if you go too large on the opening, you have to then get special software specifically for that TB simply because the ECU can only adapt to so much new incoming air. All of these are key factors, furthermore the throttle bodies are one of the last bottlenecks on the AMGs and this should only be a mod of last resort (meaning you have put every other possible bolt on mod first and you have nothing left to do). If your car is lightly or even medium modded, it is simply not worth it (at least on NA applications).

just being honest.
~AMS~
Old 05-30-2009, 01:17 AM
  #12  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
AMGSC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: So Cal
Posts: 2,347
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2006 Weistec 3.0L SC'd C55, 2006 MaxPsi PT6466 Turbo'd M3, 2019 Maserati GTS , 2020Alfa Quadrifoglio
Originally Posted by hooleyboy
How will an 82mm throttle body fit on the intake manifold? I just happen to have a few of these sitting around. My garage is turning into a Mercedes used parts depot.

Correct except I don't have the stock intake manifold. It's the Kleemann intake manifold which is much bigger. Even the plumbing for the intercooler is 1-1/2 inches which is why the CM30 is a restriction ini fluid flow.

That thing your holding looks vaguely familiar to what's sitting in my garage as well.

A good point though...as NA'd C55s would need further mods but Vadim says he wants to make this a kit if there is enough demand. I can measure it tomorrow and compare it to your measurements. I believe the opening is 78mm which would be fine for 78mm kit but not 82mm.

Last edited by AMGSC; 05-30-2009 at 01:58 PM.
Old 05-30-2009, 01:25 AM
  #13  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
AMGSC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: So Cal
Posts: 2,347
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2006 Weistec 3.0L SC'd C55, 2006 MaxPsi PT6466 Turbo'd M3, 2019 Maserati GTS , 2020Alfa Quadrifoglio
Originally Posted by AMS Performance
You can only go as large as the intake manifold opening itself. Some Mercedes have a much bigger opening on the intake manifold than the throttle body, others don't and are pretty much the same. You could always machine the opening but that's labor intensive and costly.

Furthermore, if you go too large on the opening, you have to then get special software specifically for that TB simply because the ECU can only adapt to so much new incoming air. All of these are key factors, furthermore the throttle bodies are one of the last bottlenecks on the AMGs and this should only be a mod of last resort (meaning you have put every other possible bolt on mod first and you have nothing left to do). If your car is lightly or even medium modded, it is simply not worth it (at least on NA applications).

just being honest.
~AMS~
It's a good thing Vadim is a co-tenant and partnered with Powerchip. My car will definitely be custom dyno and road tuned. I would think that intake restriction is one of the first things you want to open up. If you can't inhale fully how can you exhale fully. btw...I thought you were working on a larger TB kit for C55s? Also still interested in a bigger AMS pulley to add more boost.
Old 05-30-2009, 01:15 PM
  #14  
Moderator Alumni
 
TruTaing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 3,255
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 7 Posts
w203 m112
Originally Posted by AMGSC
A good point though...as NA'd C55s would need further mods but Vadim says he wants to make this a kit if there is enough demand. I can measure it tomorrow and compare it to your measurements. I believe the opening is 78mm which would be fine for 78mm kit but not 82mm.
Ah, this is what I was getting at

To chime in on AMS's comments about needing retuning with larger (than usual) throttle bodies that require opening up the intake mani... I just figure if I am going to install a new intake manifold, why not spend the time/effort to open it up a bit to prepare for an even larger throttle body + retune since it would be one of my last mods anywhoo? BUT if the MAF's ID can not be increased, then this would be completely moot

Thanks for chiming in fellas.
Old 05-30-2009, 01:26 PM
  #15  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
AMGSC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: So Cal
Posts: 2,347
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2006 Weistec 3.0L SC'd C55, 2006 MaxPsi PT6466 Turbo'd M3, 2019 Maserati GTS , 2020Alfa Quadrifoglio
Originally Posted by TruTaing
Ah, this is what I was getting at

To chime in on AMS's comments about needing retuning with larger (than usual) throttle bodies that require opening up the intake mani... I just figure if I am going to install a new intake manifold, why not spend the time/effort to open it up a bit to prepare for an even larger throttle body + retune since it would be one of my last mods anywhoo? BUT if the MAF's ID can not be increased, then this would be completely moot

Thanks for chiming in fellas.
You are right again. The stock MAF ID according to Vadim is 3 inches or 74mm but Vadim's kit will machine the housing out to 82mm and yes he knows how to increase the ID of the MAF itself without affecting the sensor's ability to function properly. I just called him.

Edit: Just measured it myself this morning and its 3 inches/74mm all right. Vadim can open her up easy though.

Last edited by AMGSC; 05-31-2009 at 03:48 AM.
Old 05-30-2009, 03:43 PM
  #16  
Super Member
 
60n5pt1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: san jose, ca
Posts: 510
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
2002 C32 1987 190E 2.3 334K miles and going
After all this, what's the total benefit in performance ( HP, Torque increase, etc., cost effectiveness)
Old 05-30-2009, 06:34 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
mb_c55amg_guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 473
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2005 c55amg, 2000 clk430, 2002 clk55amg, 2008 clk63amg black series
Originally Posted by 60n5pt1
After all this, what's the total benefit in performance ( HP, Torque increase, etc., cost effectiveness)
Old 05-30-2009, 06:37 PM
  #18  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
AMGSC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: So Cal
Posts: 2,347
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2006 Weistec 3.0L SC'd C55, 2006 MaxPsi PT6466 Turbo'd M3, 2019 Maserati GTS , 2020Alfa Quadrifoglio
Originally Posted by 60n5pt1
After all this, what's the total benefit in performance ( HP, Torque increase, etc., cost effectiveness)
You talking about the 82mm TB or the car? I think you mean the car right? It will be in the low 10 seconds 1/4 ET at over 130mph therefore will break the all-time MB dragtime record this June with just the SC. After the bore, stroke and TT, this will be into the 9's by Q4-2009.

Last edited by AMGSC; 05-30-2009 at 06:41 PM.
Old 05-30-2009, 09:28 PM
  #19  
Super Member
 
60n5pt1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: san jose, ca
Posts: 510
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
2002 C32 1987 190E 2.3 334K miles and going
Alleluia!!
nuff said
Old 05-30-2009, 11:41 PM
  #20  
Super Moderator
 
splinter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 3,365
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
GMC - Miata - Trek - P-Car
Originally Posted by hooleyboy
...I just happen to have a few of these sitting around. My garage is turning into a Mercedes used parts depot.
MB’s switchable-length normally aspirated intake manifold is kinda slick.
No doubt accounts for a fair portion of their relatively broad torque curve.

Shouldn’t be too much effort bore its opening for a larger TB – mounting stud spacing permitting.

Snazzy shoe you’re wearing, hooleyboy.

Originally Posted by AMGSC
You talking about the 82mm TB or the car? I think you mean the car right? It will be in the low 10 seconds 1/4 ET at over 130mph therefore will break the all-time MB dragtime record this June with just the SC. After the bore, stroke and TT, this will be into the 9's by Q4-2009.
Good luck with making that become a reality, Robert.

Trust you’ll continue to keep us updated with its progress.
Old 05-31-2009, 08:13 AM
  #21  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
NitrogenBalance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Portsmouth, NH
Posts: 1,559
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
none
Originally Posted by moosejaw
Agreed the price is insane
Is the 82mm the one they use on the V-12?
I think it is from the new 550 motors??
Old 05-31-2009, 09:12 AM
  #22  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
c32AMG-DTM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 2,949
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2008 A8L, 2002 996TT X50, 2009 X5
Originally Posted by NitrogenBalance
I think it is from the new 550 motors??
+1

I believe the TB comes off of the N/A 550's as well.
Old 05-31-2009, 12:30 PM
  #23  
Moderator Alumni
 
TruTaing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 3,255
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 7 Posts
w203 m112
Originally Posted by AMGSC
Edit: Just measured it myself this morning and its 3 inches/74mm all right. Vadim can open her up easy though.
This is something I would love to hear more about. Would he be using a larger housing? A different MAF all together? If this happens, this would open up the smallest bottle neck in our (NA m112/m113) intake pre-intake manifold!

Please chime in Vadim
Old 05-31-2009, 11:13 PM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
cldriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 321
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
AW '05 C55
Interested in new TB for my C55 (Kleemann SC). Want to see what it will do though and if there are any issues.
Old 06-02-2009, 09:47 PM
  #25  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
AMGSC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: So Cal
Posts: 2,347
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2006 Weistec 3.0L SC'd C55, 2006 MaxPsi PT6466 Turbo'd M3, 2019 Maserati GTS , 2020Alfa Quadrifoglio
Pics of 82mm TB

Next challenge is widen the MAF sensor.....
Attached Thumbnails 82mm TB for C55-82mmtb.jpg  


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: 82mm TB for C55



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:33 AM.