C32 AMG, C55 AMG (W203) 2001 - 2007

C55 vs IS F

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Aug 13, 2017 | 09:27 PM
  #1  
austinholloman's Avatar
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,490
Likes: 5
From: Dallas, Texas
W203 C55 and SAAB 9-3 2.0T
C55 vs IS F

Was out the other night and a heavily modded ISF wanted to run. I chased him for a second and then grew up and let him go but I was hanging in there pretty good. Do you guys think a C55 with intake, long tube headers, exhaust and a tune could run down a stock ISF from a roll? The stock numbers are pretty close to our cars stock. Thoughts?

https://youtu.be/D94L8KEKoeU
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2017 | 09:40 PM
  #2  
Accidental L8 apex's Avatar
Super Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 852
Likes: 170
2013 c63 Magnuson SCed
Originally Posted by austinholloman
Do you guys think a C55 with intake, long tube headers, exhaust and a tune could run down a stock ISF from a roll? The stock numbers are pretty close to our cars stock. Thoughts?
I'd say from a roll, we should have an edge since we make so much torque down low, but it'll be close either way.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2017 | 10:00 PM
  #3  
austinholloman's Avatar
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,490
Likes: 5
From: Dallas, Texas
W203 C55 and SAAB 9-3 2.0T
I wish our cars came with the 7 speed tranny in the slk55. I never understood why our cars got skipped on that. The slk55 has the exact same motor.
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2017 | 11:50 AM
  #4  
insame1's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,562
Likes: 194
From: Austin, TX
2006 E55, 2012 GLK350 & 1992 190e sportline
Originally Posted by austinholloman
I wish our cars came with the 7 speed tranny in the slk55. I never understood why our cars got skipped on that. The slk55 has the exact same motor.
because c class.
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2017 | 06:12 PM
  #5  
austinholloman's Avatar
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,490
Likes: 5
From: Dallas, Texas
W203 C55 and SAAB 9-3 2.0T
The E55 got it too though...
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2017 | 09:24 AM
  #6  
insame1's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,562
Likes: 194
From: Austin, TX
2006 E55, 2012 GLK350 & 1992 190e sportline
Originally Posted by austinholloman
The E55 got it too though...
again that is not a c class. c was the lowest end MB you can get in the USA at the time.
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2017 | 06:31 PM
  #7  
austinholloman's Avatar
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,490
Likes: 5
From: Dallas, Texas
W203 C55 and SAAB 9-3 2.0T
Let me rephrase, the E55 has our exact same 5 speed and cost more new than a SLK55.
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2017 | 07:32 PM
  #8  
winks911's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 252
Likes: 4
From: Toronto
2006 C55 RENNtech
It so happen I had an encounter with one 2 weeks ago
as soon as we stepped on it he knew he made a huge mistake...
All he kept asking after we met later was ....
What is RENNtech?

Reply
Old Aug 15, 2017 | 08:53 PM
  #9  
austinholloman's Avatar
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,490
Likes: 5
From: Dallas, Texas
W203 C55 and SAAB 9-3 2.0T
Originally Posted by winks911
It so happen I had an encounter with one 2 weeks ago
as soon as we stepped on it he knew he made a huge mistake...
All he kept asking after we met later was ....
What is RENNtech?

What kind of power is your car putting down on the dyno with your setup? If you don't mind telling me, why did you choose the RENNtech SC over Kleemann?
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2017 | 11:55 PM
  #10  
winks911's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 252
Likes: 4
From: Toronto
2006 C55 RENNtech
On the third dyno run we were up to 496 then we were having some kind of issue no being able to run out the gear
turned out to be a bad maf sensor and that was without the renntech intake.
I'm also now running ported polished heads with
MBH headers. ill get it back to the dyno soon if the car does not get sold before as I don't have time to drive it.

The reason for the renn oner klee was less power but better longterm reliability unless you install a non amg engine with kleeman charger, why is that ? lower compression ratio.
If you can afford it forget all this and get an E55 or an E55
swap. From what I've seen its a lot of work but the best hp for the money in return.
But here's the weirdest thing my fuel is sometimes 7.5 liters per 100km.
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2017 | 03:43 AM
  #11  
tw2's Avatar
tw2
MBWorld Fanatic!
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 3,428
Likes: 288
From: New Zealand
Originally Posted by austinholloman
Let me rephrase, the E55 has our exact same 5 speed and cost more new than a SLK55.
The 7-speed at the time could not take the torque from the E55. I'm sure they would have used it if they reliably could. Even the M156 E63 with the early 229.7 was pretty close to the limits and only used because of the marked torque decrease from the E55 as the engines changed.

CLK55 also didn't get the 7-speed which is slightly more difficult to explain as I thought it was supposed to be coupe equivalent to the E-class (definitely not the same interior quality). The SLK55 also needed the 7-speed's better ratios to be faster than the earlier SLK32 which was lighter and made almost the same power.
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2017 | 04:08 PM
  #12  
austinholloman's Avatar
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,490
Likes: 5
From: Dallas, Texas
W203 C55 and SAAB 9-3 2.0T
Originally Posted by winks911
On the third dyno run we were up to 496 then we were having some kind of issue no being able to run out the gear
turned out to be a bad maf sensor and that was without the renntech intake.
I'm also now running ported polished heads with
MBH headers. ill get it back to the dyno soon if the car does not get sold before as I don't have time to drive it.

The reason for the renn oner klee was less power but better longterm reliability unless you install a non amg engine with kleeman charger, why is that ? lower compression ratio.
If you can afford it forget all this and get an E55 or an E55
swap. From what I've seen its a lot of work but the best hp for the money in return.
But here's the weirdest thing my fuel is sometimes 7.5 liters per 100km.
I don't like the size of the E55 or the suspension. I'll put every bolt on I can on my C55 and then buy a C63 in a few years. If I find a used SC, I'll think about it.
Reply

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:38 PM.