Would you rather...
Mercedes cars have a reputation that they'll last forever! In my opinion, well kept high mileage C43, is better than abused low mileage 10 year old C36. It's just a guestimate!
Everyone has opinions about mileage and age of the cars, but in reality I believe, everything depends on what condition you buy your car, and how you maintain it.
Godd luck to you with your purchase!
Get both cars checked
a 96 c36 with 30000 miles
OR
a 98 c43 with 108000 miles
both priced the same.
*grumbles* Im still trying to buy.....
Trending Topics
2) check the maintenance history
3) have an independent mechanic chek them both
If all things are equal, then I would say the C36 with the lower miles is the better car.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
I took the c43 out for a spin a few weeks ago. Its worth it for that glorious sound alone.
Im going to go examine the C36 - check the records, get a PPI etc.
Well I have a good problem - a decision to make!
I am investigated this c36 more closely. The story gets convoluted... an imported vehicle out of Hong Kong... all fine and dany I dont have a problem with that...
BUT
The VIN number I have been given, according to my lookup - shows it to be a C280.
Chasis no : WDB202028-2F-262703
Engine no : 104941-22-056888
According to my research:
W202 > C 280*
VIN: 202.028*
Engine: 104.941*
W202 > C 36 AMG*
VIN: 202.090*
Engine: 113.92*
W202 > C 43 AMG*
VIN: 202.033*
Engine: 113.944*
That makes it look like a C280 to me.
Now my question is that these numbers are constant, irrespective of where in the world the vehicle is delivered right? Thats the whole point of a VIN isn't it?
Pictures of the sheep in wolfs clothing here:
http://carpoint.com.au/used-car/MERC...s/1600796.aspx
The claimed 30000 miles for the C36 might not be true after all.
http://www.benzworld.org/forums/foru...posts=14&fid=3
Apparently all is in order... it certainly looks like a C36.



