C43 to 55 to 6.1 Brabus to Kleeman!
If I got a C43, I'd want to do the top of the line Kleeman upgrade, but I want more dispalcement first, so I thought about the W210 E55 motor swap to do the Kleeman on top of, then I thought why stop there, Brabus has a 6.1 conversion that I could do first, then in a few years do the Kleeman Supercharger, cams, ecu, headers, everthing on top of that...now I wouldn't need the complete Brabus package (cams, ecu, ect.), only the displacement because the rest I'll do with the Kleeman upgrade, but can the Brabus 6.1 conversion be performed on the 4.3 motor or just the 5.5? - Would I have to get the E55 motor first then fo the Brabus mod to it, then drop it in or could I just do it to the 4.3 motor? - What would be the pros & cons of each? - (money aside - thats obvious )
Thanks
Randy
SoCal - 805 V.C.
The mechanic who did my 5.4L swap I think is doing a newer E55 Kompressor swap into a W203. That's the sh*t there w/o breaking the bank IMO.
You want the 5.4L motor if your going to do that sik stuff to it. Much beefier crank, and silica-steel sleeves that were pressed into the aluminum block while it was still hot, where the C43 had a coating I believe. Not that I know the max bore the 4.3L can handle, but bore the 4.3L any and you lose the coating completely anyway. ...I believe this is how it is at least with those engines.
Edit: how much you want to offer me for my car to get you started?
just kid'n.
Last edited by c55m8o; Apr 10, 2006 at 05:30 PM.
... If you say the money is an issue then you better off getting a C55 and leave it stock..
...
Trending Topics
my price would be over what anyone would be willing to pay so I won't even say it.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Kleemann offers the following packages for the stock 4.3L and 5.5L (E55) engines:
Engine Mod Hp Torque (lb-ft)
4.3L S/C 430 414
4.3L Stage 7 475 442
5.5L S/C 560 530
5.5L Stage 8 600 590
BTW, I don't generally believe in modifications, but if I was going to do anything, I would go with a package from a reputable tuner and not try to combine mods from different tuners. Just my 2c.
http://www.kleemann.dk/site/D73BB20B...AD205206BF.htm
http://www.kleemann.dk/site/64A747CF...209322635F.htm
http://www.kleemann.dk/site/Main/worldrecords/e55k
............the issue is simple............boost power. To generate the desired HP, the Kleemann s/c was designed and tested to work in the 5.5 liter engines to reliably produce close to the stated Hp and tq numbers. If you then bore out your engine and then instal the Kleemann s/c, you will not have enough boost pressure to make much power.
Ted
............the issue is simple............boost power. To generate the desired HP, the Kleemann s/c was designed and tested to work in the 5.5 liter engines to reliably produce close to the stated Hp and tq numbers. If you then bore out your engine and then instal the Kleemann s/c, you will not have enough boost pressure to make much power.
Ted
Brabus displacement + Kleemann s/c i wouldn't recommend it. There's actually a guy on this board who has that combo and in all honesty stick with one tuner if you can. Otherwise if you get into some engine issues it'll be a nightmare. Again stick with one tuner. Kleemann all the way!
I just don't understand why on earth somebody would buy an old bodystyle and sink that kind of money into it, absoluteley irrationale if you ask me.
With respect to build quality, the new C-class is undisputably much improved over the 202. Just look at the transmission issues with the C43.The transmission of the C43 should warrant enough reason to not consider such modifications in which the engine will be developing in excess of 450 H.P.
No matter how beautiful you find the older looking 202 bodystyle to be, there is no way you can justify sinking that kind of money into a car unless you've suffered severe head trauma at some point in your life. It just does not make sense. If money is no object, and the new C-class does not suit your taste, then there are hundreds of other cars that are alot nicer looking than the 202 c-class.
Not to mention, has reliability ever crossed your mind. Obviously tuners like Kleemann and Brabus attempt to maximize power by tuning the motor to its absolute operating capability. Doing the modifications of both tuners probably exceeds the threshholds of the engine by a fair margin. You would probably be lucky if you even got 5000 miles out of such an engine. What people seem to forget much to often, is that tuning is always a trade off. By increasing power output you will almost always reduce reliability. People think that they can tune a car to race car performance levels and drive the thing for >50,000 miles. Unfortunately, it does not work that way. A good example is top fuel dragsters. Yes, they put out absurd horsepower numbers, however the engines need to be rebuilt from the bottom up every 3-5 runs.
So along with with the inordinate costs of having such modifications undertaken, you should also factor in the inordinate maintenance bills you will see from your mechanic. Tuning a C43 in such a manner verges on borderline stupidity.
I was reluctant to even reply the 1st time seeing this pretty silly (imo) idea -- also being the author's 1st post -- and that he/she was just yank'n our chain ... I think so even more now.
I'm outta this thread as I feel like a suka for providing even any of my thoughts....
04-10-2006 09:21 PM
Yesterday 06:45 PM
.............
..............finally just wanted to say that I am happy to be alive when the car culture finally came back. The automobile is back. It is not just a way to get from point A to point B. It is a whole subculture. The HP race is back, car modifications are back, tuners are everywhere, and customers are finally having fun again with the automobile as was the case in the 60's.
Ted









