C36 Front Brakes
112 ft makes sense to me...that video is bull**** even their 0-60mph time is weird lol.
still..112ft for a 10 years setup and still is better or equal to some of the best car on the planet !









to get those times, you need good tires, a good driver who knows how to launch, and good track conditions
Im sure these guys dont spend all day on one car trying to get the best time
they get in the car, punch it and document w\e they get
The Best of Mercedes & AMG

Plus I doubt a braking test requires much skill
Take a look at this PDF. It's got sixty to zero braking specs for a 2003 Enzo.
It says 109 feet from 60 MPH. Not 70MPH. Not 80MPH. Sixty. Do you really think a C43 can stop in almost 15% less distance than an Enzo Ferrari?
Don't get me wrong. There's no harm in having believed something you thought was from a good source. AND the C43 does have fantastic brakes. But come on man, give it up. The facts are in front of you - MotorWeek is wrong.
What could have gone wrong in the video? The car obviously did what it did
You think these guys just did a careless test on the car??
Yea it sounds unreal for a little c class to brake that good but you never know.
These cars were called "AMG specials" back in the day and they have racing background plus they are hand built
Also enzo uses ceramic brakes. Those stop way quicker once they get heated up so im sure the car is capable of more than that
Last edited by steve s; Oct 20, 2009 at 03:46 AM. Reason: added pic
What could have gone wrong in the video? The car obviously did what it did
You think these guys just did a careless test on the car??
Yea it sounds unreal for a little c class to brake that good but you never know.
These cars were called "AMG specials" back in the day and they have racing background plus they are hand built
Also enzo uses ceramic brakes. Those stop way quicker once they get heated up so im sure the car is capable of more than that
Man, its really unreal to have a 1.6 ton merc on skinny 225 rubbers upfront out brake the master of all cars in braking the Porsche 911
by such a margin, which back then couldnt do better than 113ft. 1 foot more than the AMG and thats amazing by itself.
even the new Boxter S needs 105 Ft.
As for the Vid what if it wasn’t at 60MPH just being at 55 will make all the diff in the world when it comes to braking distance.
After all this is a heavy Merc, and i respect that its one of the first (36 included here) mercs to have a brake system you can still trust after several high speed stops, cause thats what counts. come real life i doubt any of us will stop in just 112ft, a drop of cat **** will stretch that a few feet, let alone bit of dust.
But browse the Porsche forums, and u'll see that they aren't as good as ppl think they are. Its the stupendous price that has ppl thinking they must be way better.




Ok so lets get this straight, the performace of both the C43 and C36 are just about equal 0-60, and quarter mile, SO are you telling me Motorweek is basically saying a C230K is just as fast as BOTH the C36 and C43 AMG's?? OMG what bull**** Motorweek IS. Pathetic.
That video is right here, the part is at 1:20. - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OoJ5r1iYjkE
).. just pointing out that both u and the motorweek c43 have the sliding calipers. wanted to double check if PJmak really has 4-pistons calipers as he stated c43 should have.
Quote:
Originally Posted by steve s
even between the 3 years the c36 was built, there were huge variations.
here are some numbers in the u.s.
1995, 444 sold, list msrp $49,800, 268 hp 4-sp
1996, 338 sold, list msrp $51,000, 268 hp 4-sp
1997, 236 sold, list msrp $51,925, 276 hp 5-sp
some had sl600 front brakes (4-piston), some had e420 front brakes (single piston ate sliding crap)
You are wrong on the "Brakes" part of your post,,,
The '95's had their own Custom AMG brakes/calipers, and the '96 and '97's FRONT brakes were from the SL600, and the REAR brakes were from the E420.

The blue calipers are C43 calipers not Pre or post 96 C36 calipers.
I wonder how long my turbo'd Cossie 190 with C36 4 piston front calipers and a new E420 brake master cylinder would take to stop
and it aint the first C36 i see with red calipers front and rear. the only other colors i have seen are silver also showing AMG logo, and the unpainted ATE stuff (no AMG logo).
ps: PO stands for?????
however, this is what i have

rotors are these, 2104210712

pads that correspond to these are listed as A0044200220, not the A0054200220 listed in the dealers computer database nor the mbusa technical database.
so clearly, i don't believe i have the sl600 brakes in the front. hence, why i said some may have had e-class front brakes. the first 3 number of the part number stamped on the rotor seems to indicate it's from 210 as well.
and no, nobody's replaced them with something else. i'm the first owner, 30k original miles on it. (surprisingly, as i've never had front brake pads last 30k, rears maybe, fronts no)
For discs, I show an early C36 as using a WA2024210112 on the left and a WA2024210212 on the right. They list for $190 each. I show the later C36 as using a 2104211712 (either side). Those list for $104 each. The early C36 calipers appear as WA2024210198 on the left and WA2024210298 on the right. $1100 each. Later C36 calipers appear as 0014203383 for the left and 0014203483 for the right. Those later calipers list for $950, and also fit a 1997 E420.
0044200220 pads appear as SLK230 (1998-2004) parts. Mercedes-Benz of Annapolis supplied the prices and applications. There may be other applications for those parts.






