My Honda Worshipping Buddy Has Threatened My C36!!!
And Greg, something about those numbers sounds iffy. I know for a fact that C36's can do mid 14's easy....something must have been off. The only reason I insist is because the only thing I consider legit is time slips and Jon's got them...he aint lyin'! Do you have any timeslips scanned in that you could PM me by any chance? I want to start collecting some real world numbers, maybe we could even plan a trip to a local track when we get together for a meet this summer (Lime Rock Raceway Possibly). Now that would be ****.
*I think* there are two reasons why you're seeing different numbers. One: Drag racing is an art. I worked with a guy who could drive, and I mean really drive. He ran a 13.8 in a car that I couldn't get below a 14.1. Same car, same day, the only difference was talent. I've gotten a lot better, but I'm still not as fast as Greg Smalls.
Two: Magazines don't rent tracks for months on end to test cars. Electronic equipment is used (a GPS box - NOT a GTech) and most of the time a "track" isn't involved. Even when at the track, GPS boxes are used - and they're not used like most people think they are.
It's tough to replicate a number if you don't know how it was recorded. The trap speed however, we'll, that number doesn't lie.
I'll put a web page up at Signal to Noise that explains how cars are tested. It should be up in a couple of days.
*I think* there are two reasons why you're seeing different numbers. One: Drag racing is an art. I worked with a guy who could drive, and I mean really drive. He ran a 13.8 in a car that I couldn't get below a 14.1. Same car, same day, the only difference was talent. I've gotten a lot better, but I'm still not as fast as Greg Smalls.
Two: Magazines don't rent tracks for months on end to test cars. Electronic equipment is used (a GPS box - NOT a GTech) and most of the time a "track" isn't involved. Even when at the track, GPS boxes are used - and they're not used like most people think they are.
It's tough to replicate a number if you don't know how it was recorded. The trap speed however, we'll, that number doesn't lie.
I'll put a web page up at Signal to Noise that explains how cars are tested. It should be up in a couple of days.




Another thing to consider is track prep. If the magazine is doing the sprint down a runway with a GPS box hooked up, they're probably not going to get the same ET as someone who goes to a Friday night drag and is on a track that has been treated with VHT.
I agree, the trap speed is more indicative of how much power the car is making. You really need all the other info to glean anything from the ET, such as 60' time.
And what do you think I'm dreaming these numbers up!?? I got them straight from Jon!
0-60 at 5.6 seconds on many runs JUST like he got (All Stock) sounds about right.
Now just because you got a MUCH worse time with your C36 doesn't mean ALL are that slow.
Another thing to consider is track prep. If the magazine is doing the sprint down a runway with a GPS box hooked up, they're probably not going to get the same ET as someone who goes to a Friday night drag and is on a track that has been treated with VHT.
I agree, the trap speed is more indicative of how much power the car is making. You really need all the other info to glean anything from the ET, such as 60' time.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
And what do you think I'm dreaming these numbers up!?? I got them straight from Jon!
0-60 at 5.6 seconds on many runs JUST like he got (All Stock) sounds about right.
Now just because you got a MUCH worse time with your C36 doesn't mean ALL are that slow.
Last edited by AMGC; Feb 4, 2010 at 04:17 PM.
When i first got mine i was told by several ppl who are not related or even known to each others that this one i got is known to be faster than the avg c36s they have seen. Its previous owner who has the 43 even said that its faster than his up to 125mph atleast.
So a good kept and taken care of c36 can make 14 secs@99mph any less and its up to the track conditions on that day.
Anywho, I'm talking about Jon's C36 AMG which is in perfect running order.
Oh and BTW, no need for such a stupid reply like that Greg.
v0ac, why would you cook crack in the microwave? Sorry for my ignorance, btw this thread has gone wayyyyy off topic but it's amusing and I have gotten good information from it while the integrity lasted.

gotta love our "brotherly love" man




I ramble, guilty as he||.


