C450/C43 AMG
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

12.3@114mph - C43 with BMS JB1

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 09-30-2017, 12:48 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
18bora's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 410
Received 176 Likes on 104 Posts
2020 GLC 63
12.3@114mph - C43 with BMS JB1

Was hoping to get more clean runs, but the track was packed with too many fluid spills, cleanups, a flip-over and waiting in between. Anywho, below are my best runs of the night. I feel it has a slight flat-spot mid-range, otherwise




The following 2 users liked this post by 18bora:
Gidrow (09-30-2017), threefirs (09-30-2017)
Old 09-30-2017, 04:18 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
18bora's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 410
Received 176 Likes on 104 Posts
2020 GLC 63
I did Roll Racing today @ E-town, all back to back runs. One thing I noticed, this car is more consistent running back to back vs. long cool-down periods. Most interesting run was vs. a tuned C63s, very close from the start until the 1/8, after that > >> >>>



Last edited by 18bora; 09-30-2017 at 04:20 PM.
Old 09-30-2017, 04:19 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
18bora's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 410
Received 176 Likes on 104 Posts
2020 GLC 63
dupe
Old 09-30-2017, 04:30 PM
  #4  
Super Member
 
threefirs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Toronto
Posts: 526
Received 85 Likes on 73 Posts
2017 C43 AMG Cabriolet Black/Cranberry Red
Originally Posted by 18bora
Was hoping to get more clean runs, but the track was packed with too many fluid spills, cleanups, a flip-over and waiting in between. Anywho, below are my best runs of the night. I feel it has a slight flat-spot mid-range, otherwise




So impressive, especially for the cost.

Thanks for sharing.
Old 10-01-2017, 03:33 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
18bora's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 410
Received 176 Likes on 104 Posts
2020 GLC 63
Originally Posted by threefirs
So impressive, especially for the cost.

Thanks for sharing.
Thanks, based on a few calculations (averaging E.T.s, trap speeds/weight) and compared to the stock 367hp, the car is making around 65hp over stock. BMS claims 46 over stock on map1/91 octane, this is map2/93+ octane.

Besides removing the top speed limiter, a full 93 octane tune should be able to make more. However, based on the results, I can't justify the 2k price tag of a full tune.

This is what I use for hp calculations http://wallaceracing.com/et-hp-mph.php I plug in my lowest and highest E.Ts/weight and Trap speeds/weight and average everything.
Old 10-01-2017, 05:08 PM
  #6  
Member
 
crocoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: West By God Virginia :)
Posts: 80
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
C450 AMG,, JAAAAG XF 5.0
Originally Posted by 18bora
Thanks, based on a few calculations (averaging E.T.s, trap speeds/weight) and compared to the stock 367hp, the car is making around 65hp over stock. BMS claims 46 over stock on map1/91 octane, this is map2/93+ octane.

Besides removing the top speed limiter, a full 93 octane tune should be able to make more. However, based on the results, I can't justify the 2k price tag of a full tune.

This is what I use for hp calculations http://wallaceracing.com/et-hp-mph.php I plug in my lowest and highest E.Ts/weight and Trap speeds/weight and average everything.
Trust me you will enjoy your car even more with proper tune. I have nothing against piggybacks but a full tune will give you that pull all the way to redline.

You really can't go wrong of the big three. AMR, EC or OE. Call each one and see if they'll work a deal with you. Usually they try to help and discount advertised prices.
Old 10-02-2017, 08:45 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
18bora's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 410
Received 176 Likes on 104 Posts
2020 GLC 63
Originally Posted by crocoss
You really can't go wrong of the big three. AMR, EC or OE. Call each one and see if they'll work a deal with you. Usually they try to help and discount advertised prices.
Based on my own research and my current times, I won't even consider the latest two; as for the first one, it's overpriced. We drive a ~60k car, it's not a Ferrari or McLaren. As far as I know, none of them actually calibrate/tune our ECU, they just flash a canned tune in it that shouldn't cost more than $600-800. However, if people are willing to pay, why not!
The following users liked this post:
Star4life (10-03-2017)
Old 10-08-2017, 11:03 AM
  #8  
Super Member
 
cenzo86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: NYC
Posts: 720
Received 73 Likes on 62 Posts
2016 c450 / 2016 VW Jetta 1.8t / 2006 Wrangler X
Originally Posted by 18bora
Thanks, based on a few calculations (averaging E.T.s, trap speeds/weight) and compared to the stock 367hp, the car is making around 65hp over stock. BMS claims 46 over stock on map1/91 octane, this is map2/93+ octane.

Besides removing the top speed limiter, a full 93 octane tune should be able to make more. However, based on the results, I can't justify the 2k price tag of a full tune.

This is what I use for hp calculations http://wallaceracing.com/et-hp-mph.php I plug in my lowest and highest E.Ts/weight and Trap speeds/weight and average everything.
That is very impressive. 12+ MPH increase in the trap speed over stock is a good bump. I was looking over Dinan's new programmer (you know the $1400 one), and noticed it looks remarkably similar to the BMS JB1, with the same sensor hookups. The Dinan unit claims 57HP increase, and if these units both basically do the same thing you calculations don't surprise me.
How does the car feel in day to day driving? Can you feel the increased power? I'm getting into that 18 month funk with my car. I think it's time to make some improvements, and JB1 is priced nicely.
Old 10-08-2017, 12:37 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Lazz83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: North East
Posts: 400
Received 44 Likes on 39 Posts
2017 AMG C43, AWE Touring, BMC Air Filters- 2015 BMW X3 3.5i (JB1 Equipped)
Originally Posted by 18bora
Based on my own research and my current times, I won't even consider the latest two; as for the first one, it's overpriced. We drive a ~60k car, it's not a Ferrari or McLaren. As far as I know, none of them actually calibrate/tune our ECU, they just flash a canned tune in it that shouldn't cost more than $600-800. However, if people are willing to pay, why not!
That's correct they are canned tunes every car runs slightly differently and mods add to that factor and it changes even more. I have BMC air filters and AWE catback and plan on 200 Cel downpipes, so a canned tune won't get me the best bang out of my mods. That is why a company like AMR has a custom dyno tune available, where they run your vehicle on the dyno and they custom tune to your vehicles characteristics. Canned tunes are a ballpark upgrade based on estimated figures of their test mule, custom tune is off your specific vehicle.

This was the way it was done 10-15yrs ago, all dyno runs with A/F tailored to your specific vehicle, canned tunes will never be as good. Its like getting a custom tailored suite or an off the rack suite- which will fit better?

BTW those are some solid numbers your running!

Last edited by Lazz83; 10-08-2017 at 12:43 PM.
Old 10-08-2017, 01:26 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
18bora's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 410
Received 176 Likes on 104 Posts
2020 GLC 63
Originally Posted by cenzo86
That is very impressive. 12+ MPH increase in the trap speed over stock is a good bump. I was looking over Dinan's new programmer (you know the $1400 one), and noticed it looks remarkably similar to the BMS JB1, with the same sensor hookups. The Dinan unit claims 57HP increase, and if these units both basically do the same thing you calculations don't surprise me.
How does the car feel in day to day driving? Can you feel the increased power? I'm getting into that 18 month funk with my car. I think it's time to make some improvements, and JB1 is priced nicely.
My best stock runs were 12.8/12.9@107/106mph https://mbworld.org/forums/c450-c43-...mph-stock.html
BMS with map 1 (designed for 91 octane) with 93 in tank, 12.5@111mph https://mbworld.org/forums/c450-c43-...ack-times.html
12.3@114mph was with BMS map2 93+ octane.

Yes, I could feel the increase in power immediately! I picked up the unit used from a local forum member, drove home, opened the hood and waited 15 minutes for the ECU to sleep (per BMS instructions). At this point it was dark out, I was too lazy to swap cars in the garage and I was too anxious to install it. In the driveway with a long screw driver, and few zip ties and my son holding the flashlight, 15 minutes later I was done and went out for a ride. My first impression was, wow, this thing is making at least 40 more HP, the entire power band improved.

This was on map2 on the way to the track

Originally Posted by Lazz83
That's correct they are canned tunes every car runs slightly differently and mods add to that factor and it changes even more. I have BMC air filters and AWE catback and plan on 200 Cel downpipes, so a canned tune won't get me the best bang out of my mods. That is why a company like AMR has a custom dyno tune available, where they run your vehicle on the dyno and they custom tune to your vehicles characteristics. Canned tunes are a ballpark upgrade based on estimated figures of their test mule, custom tune is off your specific vehicle.

This was the way it was done 10-15yrs ago, all dyno runs with A/F tailored to your specific vehicle, canned tunes will never be as good. Its like getting a custom tailored suite or an off the rack suite- which will fit better?

BTW those are some solid numbers your running!
I actually called AMR asking about their dyno tune, it's not any different than the mail-in tune. According to AMR, they just run the car on the dyno to make sure everything is OK and nothing is wrong with your car, no boost leaks, etc.. Other than that, it's the same tune, you just get a dyno sheet with it.
Old 10-10-2017, 01:20 AM
  #11  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Mr. J's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 1,564
Received 263 Likes on 207 Posts
C450, GLC43
Hey 18Bora,

Which color connectors did you instal? The brown connector is supposed to be optional and somewhat difficult to access. Did you post up anything on the BMS forum? There isn't much M276 feedback over there at the moment.
Old 10-10-2017, 09:26 AM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Lazz83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: North East
Posts: 400
Received 44 Likes on 39 Posts
2017 AMG C43, AWE Touring, BMC Air Filters- 2015 BMW X3 3.5i (JB1 Equipped)
Originally Posted by 18bora
My best stock runs were 12.8/12.9@107/106mph https://mbworld.org/forums/c450-c43-...mph-stock.html
BMS with map 1 (designed for 91 octane) with 93 in tank, 12.5@111mph https://mbworld.org/forums/c450-c43-...ack-times.html
12.3@114mph was with BMS map2 93+ octane.

Yes, I could feel the increase in power immediately! I picked up the unit used from a local forum member, drove home, opened the hood and waited 15 minutes for the ECU to sleep (per BMS instructions). At this point it was dark out, I was too lazy to swap cars in the garage and I was too anxious to install it. In the driveway with a long screw driver, and few zip ties and my son holding the flashlight, 15 minutes later I was done and went out for a ride. My first impression was, wow, this thing is making at least 40 more HP, the entire power band improved.

This was on map2 on the way to the track
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hb17qgwav_A



I actually called AMR asking about their dyno tune, it's not any different than the mail-in tune. According to AMR, they just run the car on the dyno to make sure everything is OK and nothing is wrong with your car, no boost leaks, etc.. Other than that, it's the same tune, you just get a dyno sheet with it.
Thats interesting I was under the impression they dyno tuned the car- I would have to speak with them before commiting to anything.
Old 10-10-2017, 09:30 AM
  #13  
Super Member
 
threefirs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Toronto
Posts: 526
Received 85 Likes on 73 Posts
2017 C43 AMG Cabriolet Black/Cranberry Red
Originally Posted by Lazz83
Thats interesting I was under the impression they dyno tuned the car- I would have to speak with them before commiting to anything.
There is really no value in dyno tuning your car unless you have a bunch of work done under the hood. It's nice to dyno to see the power gains your car made against a baseline, but I would believe any of these companies are making the most power they'll make with their off the shelf.

Just an FYI - off topic, but Eurocharged is going to be releasing their V2 shortly. My car is one of the test cars and I made 405WHP and 456WTQ - tested and SOLID. I'm making approx 90WHP and 120WTQ which is now matching what AMR is claiming.

Good luck with your decision.
Old 10-10-2017, 09:38 AM
  #14  
Super Member
 
cenzo86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: NYC
Posts: 720
Received 73 Likes on 62 Posts
2016 c450 / 2016 VW Jetta 1.8t / 2006 Wrangler X
Originally Posted by threefirs
There is really no value in dyno tuning your car unless you have a bunch of work done under the hood. It's nice to dyno to see the power gains your car made against a baseline, but I would believe any of these companies are making the most power they'll make with their off the shelf.

Just an FYI - off topic, but Eurocharged is going to be releasing their V2 shortly. My car is one of the test cars and I made 405WHP and 456WTQ - tested and SOLID. I'm making approx 90WHP and 120WTQ which is now matching what AMR is claiming.

Good luck with your decision.
Is v2 a bench time or a piggyback?
Old 10-10-2017, 09:39 AM
  #15  
Super Member
 
threefirs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Toronto
Posts: 526
Received 85 Likes on 73 Posts
2017 C43 AMG Cabriolet Black/Cranberry Red
Originally Posted by cenzo86
Is v2 a bench time or a piggyback?
V2 is a Version 2 of the full ECU tune (not piggyback).
The following users liked this post:
ecmexchange (11-11-2017)
Old 10-10-2017, 12:22 PM
  #16  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Gungaslow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Massachusetts USA
Posts: 1,255
Received 153 Likes on 118 Posts
2017 C43 sedan
Finally Eurocharged will be equal to AMR.. I was hoping they would catch up at some point.. hopefully they can do it and not cause any cel
Old 10-10-2017, 12:39 PM
  #17  
Super Member
 
ShazV6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 541
Received 71 Likes on 59 Posts
17' C43 Coupe
Originally Posted by Gungaslow
Finally Eurocharged will be equal to AMR.. I was hoping they would catch up at some point.. hopefully they can do it and not cause any cel
LOL. Guy you are hilarious.
Old 10-10-2017, 01:27 PM
  #18  
Super Member
 
DameMD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: GA
Posts: 690
Received 84 Likes on 64 Posts
X3 M40i
Originally Posted by 18bora
My best stock runs were 12.8/12.9@107/106mph https://mbworld.org/forums/c450-c43-...mph-stock.html
BMS with map 1 (designed for 91 octane) with 93 in tank, 12.5@111mph https://mbworld.org/forums/c450-c43-...ack-times.html
12.3@114mph was with BMS map2 93+ octane.

Yes, I could feel the increase in power immediately! I picked up the unit used from a local forum member, drove home, opened the hood and waited 15 minutes for the ECU to sleep (per BMS instructions). At this point it was dark out, I was too lazy to swap cars in the garage and I was too anxious to install it. In the driveway with a long screw driver, and few zip ties and my son holding the flashlight, 15 minutes later I was done and went out for a ride. My first impression was, wow, this thing is making at least 40 more HP, the entire power band improved.

I actually called AMR asking about their dyno tune, it's not any different than the mail-in tune. According to AMR, they just run the car on the dyno to make sure everything is OK and nothing is wrong with your car, no boost leaks, etc.. Other than that, it's the same tune, you just get a dyno sheet with it.
18bora - I saw a couple of your post on the N54tech forums. Did you ever adjust the setting on the custom maps yet? I wish Terry would show more interest for our platform as I really like the JB1 and the user interface. I got down-pipes (not installed) and I was wondering if I played around with the settings could I actually just adjust a custom map for them. I would experiment but not trying to blow up my engine lol.
Old 10-10-2017, 04:02 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
18bora's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 410
Received 176 Likes on 104 Posts
2020 GLC 63
Originally Posted by Mr. J
Hey 18Bora,

Which color connectors did you instal? The brown connector is supposed to be optional and somewhat difficult to access. Did you post up anything on the BMS forum? There isn't much M276 feedback over there at the moment.
I did install the brown connector, wasn't hard at all, you must be reading about the brown connector for the C300 2.0 engine.
http://www.n54tech.com/flash_files/c300_c400_stage1.pdf go down to page5

Originally Posted by DameMD
18bora - I saw a couple of your post on the N54tech forums. Did you ever adjust the setting on the custom maps yet? I wish Terry would show more interest for our platform as I really like the JB1 and the user interface. I got down-pipes (not installed) and I was wondering if I played around with the settings could I actually just adjust a custom map for them. I would experiment but not trying to blow up my engine lol.
I tried, the car is already maxed on map2. If you try more boost there is nothing but hot air, you might get a quick torque kick, but the hot air actually causes the car to lose power. Keep in mind, my car is stock, no DP or intake.
The following users liked this post:
Mr. J (10-12-2017)

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: 12.3@114mph - C43 with BMS JB1



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:14 PM.