














Why have you not done an ECU tune yet?
I'm in final phases of deciding upon a vendor for an ECU tune for my C63. Future mods for me are unknown at this point. With all the posts regarding this vendor versus that vendor, I'm not sure who to choose yet.
But this poll is merely an attempt to understand from those who have not done an ECU tune, why not?
Please no posts in this thread regarding any specific vendor.
Last edited by AMGBeleza; Feb 19, 2009 at 02:40 PM. Reason: oops
As the OP, I specifically requested no vendor mentions in this post. Please let's keep it that way.
If you have reasons for not going with an ECU upgrade that are not reflected in the poll, by all means, please post, but please respect the no-vendor-mention request.
As the OP, I specifically requested no vendor mentions in this post. Please let's keep it that way.
If you have reasons for not going with an ECU upgrade that are not reflected in the poll, by all means, please post, but please respect the no-vendor-mention request.
compared to tunes for 911 Turbos which are twice as expensive a car
yet the tunes are 1/2 as much.
I just dont get it. Might as well wait and buy a 911TT and pay 2500 for the
tune
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
I've seen ranges from $1,500 to $4,500 for an ECU tune for the C63. The rwhp varies and the cost rises as rwhp rises. However, the incremental rwhp gains as a function of price don't make any sense to me--meaning to squeeze and extra 7 or 8 rwhp in some ECU tunes will cost you thousands. That incremental gain can be had for an ~800 pully.
But this post is to clarify something for the poll. If you want to vote, and think that the main reason why you have not done a tune yet is because the price is too high, I recommend voting, "Confused as to which vendor to select", as I think this captures that fairly well. Again, this is because you can have a quality tune done by a reputable tuner for as low as $1,500. Howeve if you think $1,500 is too high, than I'd either vote budget does not allow, or post to this thread and indicate price/value is not high enough for you.
Interesting votes so far. I would have thought Concerned about warranty issues would have a higher proportion. It's still early though.
Last edited by taylorcoleman; Feb 19, 2009 at 07:32 PM.
* price is too high because budget does not allow
* price is too high because performance gain does not merit price
So hoping to clarify for those voting that the poll was designed (poorly I'm sure) to accommodate bullet #1 above.
Also wanted to clarify that the price ranges from $1,500 - $4,500 for the tunes. This may put people into the budget ability, so they may choose another poll answer instead.
I'm sure the jump from 450 hp to 520-530 hp must be crazy, but I want to make the jump from 450 hp to 570 hp or so in one fell swoop
Frankly, I would have guessed that both "fine as is" and "warranty issues" would have dominated this poll.
Please vote!
Warranty concerns are creeping up the charts...
42 votes already, great progress!
I'll second (or third) that. The car is fine as it is, it's just knowing that the engine and other components are designed to handle more HP so it should be easy to make the jump.
For me, it's kind of "all of the above" EXCEPT "confused about which vendor" -- I definitely know which vendors I feel comfortable giving my money to at this point. So why haven't I tuned yet? 1- I haven't discussed it with my selling dealer to alleviate warranty worries. Why haven't I discussed it yet? - I can't justify adding HP to this car right now -- it's frivolous in an economy like this and my head just won't go there. My next car priority is to buy a new daily driver, not add 50+HP to a car that doesn't really need it.
By the time the economy settles out, the answer will be clear about warranty issues, and the best tuners will still be standing. That's when I will feel comfortable about jumping in.
I hate that vendors charge $150 for some painted parts because its for a c63 when the item probably costs $20 to make and ship. Generally people who can afford a c63 are smart with their money and don't get their pockets looted.
I think that the general populace of c63amg owners could have afforded much more car, but chose the c63amg for mulitple price/performance reasons. When buying cars, i've felt that if I can only afford the base model of a car, then I can't afford the car and need to drop down a model.
FWIW, if I buy a $70k car and need to put $10k in performance mods, then I should have bought an $80k car that included those mods as an option.
Paul
PS--this may be a little questionable, if all c63amg are the same performance wise, whats to keep one person getting a tune and 'sharing' the tune with other c63 owners? It's all software right?
I hate that vendors charge $150 for some painted parts because its for a c63 when the item probably costs $20 to make and ship. Generally people who can afford a c63 are smart with their money and don't get their pockets looted.
I think that the general populace of c63amg owners could have afforded much more car, but chose the c63amg for mulitple price/performance reasons. When buying cars, i've felt that if I can only afford the base model of a car, then I can't afford the car and need to drop down a model.
FWIW, if I buy a $70k car and need to put $10k in performance mods, then I should have bought an $80k car that included those mods as an option.
Paul
PS--this may be a little questionable, if all c63amg are the same performance wise, whats to keep one person getting a tune and 'sharing' the tune with other c63 owners? It's all software right?
I will say that I've seen reputable tuning vendors charge as low as $1,500 for an ECU tune. Again, I won't name names in this thread, and I very much appreciate that this thread has been stripped of vendor names.






