AMG's New Engine
10-30-2009, 06:18 PM
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: NYC's Fastest
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Radio Flyer Big Flyer fully loaded with training wheels and NOS
AMG's New Engine
http://www.motorauthority.com/blog/1...cedes-benz-slk
Hey guys, even though this talks about the new SLK, it mentions that the AMG version MAY receive a 3.6L V8 Twin-Turbo engine to replace the 6.2L V8. It also says that this new engine could bring 470hp in stock form. Just thought you guys would be interested.
Hey guys, even though this talks about the new SLK, it mentions that the AMG version MAY receive a 3.6L V8 Twin-Turbo engine to replace the 6.2L V8. It also says that this new engine could bring 470hp in stock form. Just thought you guys would be interested.
10-30-2009, 06:24 PM
#2
MBWorld Fanatic!
Automobile Magazine suggests a 4.6 liter twin turbo V8.
I might get the upcoming SLK if they offer the 6.2 liter V8 before the phase over.
http://www.automobilemag.com/feature...slk/index.html
I might get the upcoming SLK if they offer the 6.2 liter V8 before the phase over.
http://www.automobilemag.com/feature...slk/index.html
10-30-2009, 06:27 PM
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: NYC's Fastest
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Radio Flyer Big Flyer fully loaded with training wheels and NOS
Automobile Magazine suggests a 4.6 liter twin turbo V8.
I might get the upcoming SLK if they offer the 6.2 liter V8 before the phase over.
http://www.automobilemag.com/feature...slk/index.html
I might get the upcoming SLK if they offer the 6.2 liter V8 before the phase over.
http://www.automobilemag.com/feature...slk/index.html
10-30-2009, 06:43 PM
#5
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: N.Jersey and New York, stationed in Germany
Posts: 1,291
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
W164 ML500,SMART For two,1994 C280(5speed manual) 1999 C230k station wagon
I think I read something about a 3.5tt and a 5.4tt for the AMG C class.
10-30-2009, 07:24 PM
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Morehead, KY USA
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
2 Posts
SLK55 AMG, E320 BlueTec, ML350, (formerly) C32 AMG, MR2 Turbo, HD-FLH-FSE, BMW R100RS, Ducati M900
TT
According the Motor Authority:
"The AMG version, however, could deliver a gobsmacking 470 horsepower from a twin-turbo 3.6-liter V-8 engine to replace the aging 6.2-liter V-8 found in the current '63' model family."
I find that entire statement somewhat insulting. First the 6.2 liter V8 is NOT that that old, was once hailed as the most powerful normally aspirated V8 in the world and it has about the same peak power at 460ish HP, depending on what state of tune it is in. I love turbos but unless they offer more of something, all they do is make it more complex. Now a twin turbo 6.2 liter V8 at 700+ hp would be interesting. AMG, are you listening???
Irish
"The AMG version, however, could deliver a gobsmacking 470 horsepower from a twin-turbo 3.6-liter V-8 engine to replace the aging 6.2-liter V-8 found in the current '63' model family."
I find that entire statement somewhat insulting. First the 6.2 liter V8 is NOT that that old, was once hailed as the most powerful normally aspirated V8 in the world and it has about the same peak power at 460ish HP, depending on what state of tune it is in. I love turbos but unless they offer more of something, all they do is make it more complex. Now a twin turbo 6.2 liter V8 at 700+ hp would be interesting. AMG, are you listening???
Irish
10-30-2009, 08:02 PM
#7
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 2,949
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2008 A8L, 2002 996TT X50, 2009 X5
According the Motor Authority:
"The AMG version, however, could deliver a gobsmacking 470 horsepower from a twin-turbo 3.6-liter V-8 engine to replace the aging 6.2-liter V-8 found in the current '63' model family."
I find that entire statement somewhat insulting. First the 6.2 liter V8 is NOT that that old, was once hailed as the most powerful normally aspirated V8 in the world and it has about the same peak power at 460ish HP, depending on what state of tune it is in. I love turbos but unless they offer more of something, all they do is make it more complex. Now a twin turbo 6.2 liter V8 at 700+ hp would be interesting. AMG, are you listening???
Irish
"The AMG version, however, could deliver a gobsmacking 470 horsepower from a twin-turbo 3.6-liter V-8 engine to replace the aging 6.2-liter V-8 found in the current '63' model family."
I find that entire statement somewhat insulting. First the 6.2 liter V8 is NOT that that old, was once hailed as the most powerful normally aspirated V8 in the world and it has about the same peak power at 460ish HP, depending on what state of tune it is in. I love turbos but unless they offer more of something, all they do is make it more complex. Now a twin turbo 6.2 liter V8 at 700+ hp would be interesting. AMG, are you listening???
Irish
A 3.6L V8TT could be a rev-happy addition to the AMG lineup; might have great tuning potential as well. Time'll tell, we'll have to wait and see.
Trending Topics
10-30-2009, 08:08 PM
#8
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: NYC's Fastest
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Radio Flyer Big Flyer fully loaded with training wheels and NOS
According the Motor Authority:
"The AMG version, however, could deliver a gobsmacking 470 horsepower from a twin-turbo 3.6-liter V-8 engine to replace the aging 6.2-liter V-8 found in the current '63' model family."
I find that entire statement somewhat insulting. First the 6.2 liter V8 is NOT that that old, was once hailed as the most powerful normally aspirated V8 in the world and it has about the same peak power at 460ish HP, depending on what state of tune it is in. I love turbos but unless they offer more of something, all they do is make it more complex. Now a twin turbo 6.2 liter V8 at 700+ hp would be interesting. AMG, are you listening???
Irish
"The AMG version, however, could deliver a gobsmacking 470 horsepower from a twin-turbo 3.6-liter V-8 engine to replace the aging 6.2-liter V-8 found in the current '63' model family."
I find that entire statement somewhat insulting. First the 6.2 liter V8 is NOT that that old, was once hailed as the most powerful normally aspirated V8 in the world and it has about the same peak power at 460ish HP, depending on what state of tune it is in. I love turbos but unless they offer more of something, all they do is make it more complex. Now a twin turbo 6.2 liter V8 at 700+ hp would be interesting. AMG, are you listening???
Irish
10-30-2009, 08:44 PM
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Richmond BC Canada
Posts: 436
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
C63 AMG
According the Motor Authority:
"The AMG version, however, could deliver a gobsmacking 470 horsepower from a twin-turbo 3.6-liter V-8 engine to replace the aging 6.2-liter V-8 found in the current '63' model family."
I find that entire statement somewhat insulting. First the 6.2 liter V8 is NOT that that old, was once hailed as the most powerful normally aspirated V8 in the world and it has about the same peak power at 460ish HP, depending on what state of tune it is in. I love turbos but unless they offer more of something, all they do is make it more complex. Now a twin turbo 6.2 liter V8 at 700+ hp would be interesting. AMG, are you listening???
Irish
"The AMG version, however, could deliver a gobsmacking 470 horsepower from a twin-turbo 3.6-liter V-8 engine to replace the aging 6.2-liter V-8 found in the current '63' model family."
I find that entire statement somewhat insulting. First the 6.2 liter V8 is NOT that that old, was once hailed as the most powerful normally aspirated V8 in the world and it has about the same peak power at 460ish HP, depending on what state of tune it is in. I love turbos but unless they offer more of something, all they do is make it more complex. Now a twin turbo 6.2 liter V8 at 700+ hp would be interesting. AMG, are you listening???
Irish
I think the main reason all the big players are switching to twin turbo setup is because of emission and trying to make them look more enviromental friendly.
Turbo car definitely emit less emission and is better than gas compared to our 6.2liter V8. Being able to make big power is just the icing on the cake for the automakers.
To me it the fact everyone is going FI is a sad fact. Powerful, complex high reving NA engines are definitely something many ethuthanists will miss. However FI seems to be the future and nothing can stop this trend. (well unless we find a lot more gas ...). In the end though i just wish the future smaller amg models such as C class and CLK, SLK can be made more of a sports car than just luxury cruisers.
Last edited by MikeS54; 10-30-2009 at 08:50 PM.
10-30-2009, 09:07 PM
#11
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Clifton, NJ
Posts: 4,949
Likes: 0
Received 37 Likes
on
32 Posts
96 and 08 911 turbos
I figured you drag racing types would love a factory forced induction car. Not only are tunes hugely effective, but brake boosting on the highway with an automatic would result in some good acceleration.
10-30-2009, 11:01 PM
#12
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,853
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes
on
8 Posts
SLS Irridium silver,2014 GL350 BT Irridium, 2015 White Dodge RAM Hemi Quad
Please leave our powerplants alone, no matter how fuel efficient, turbo engines are, the mass 6.2L sound could never be duplicated with these smaller displacement engines, I love this powerplant.
10-30-2009, 11:26 PM
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
C63 & Mustang Mach1(s)
10-30-2009, 11:48 PM
#14
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: NYC's Fastest
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Radio Flyer Big Flyer fully loaded with training wheels and NOS
10-31-2009, 01:24 PM
#17
MBWorld Fanatic!
10-31-2009, 01:34 PM
#18
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: NYC's Fastest
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Radio Flyer Big Flyer fully loaded with training wheels and NOS
10-31-2009, 07:18 PM
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Richmond BC Canada
Posts: 436
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
C63 AMG
M156 and LS7 looks quiet similiar on paper
LS7 does make a lot of power with slight modification but this is only made possible due to the high demand for aftermarket goods for the LS7
M156 is still at the early stage of aftermarket modification and i don't think it will ever get close to the LS7 since there just ain't that many C63s as vettes.
Anyways both are awesome engine
LS7 does make a lot of power with slight modification but this is only made possible due to the high demand for aftermarket goods for the LS7
M156 is still at the early stage of aftermarket modification and i don't think it will ever get close to the LS7 since there just ain't that many C63s as vettes.
Anyways both are awesome engine
10-31-2009, 07:20 PM
#20
MBWorld Fanatic!
10-31-2009, 07:59 PM
#22
IIRC I read in Autoweek that there will be an SLK 63.
11-03-2009, 08:22 PM
#24
So your dealer had been making interest off your money for 6 years? Its not like a SLK63 has even been rumored or announced. In fact, if i'm recalling correctly, on the PL they've said the engine flat out can't fit in the current generation.
