C63 AMG (W204) 2008 - 2015

Write-up & Photos :: 18" Forgestar F14 Wheels & Nitto NT05 Tires :: 2010 C63

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 07-01-2010, 06:08 PM
  #76  
Banned
 
Girard@ACGautomotive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 2,914
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
a car
Looks killer. I'd lower the car another 0.5"-1.0" but the wheels look just right.
Old 07-01-2010, 06:41 PM
  #77  
Administrator

 
amdeutsch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: www.Traben-Trarbach.de
Posts: 15,720
Received 28 Likes on 23 Posts
MPG+ ROLFCOPTER
Originally Posted by superlubricity
Offset (both starting and final) plays a role in the final weight of the wheel. This is especially true in this case when the vendor shaves off backpad to achieve final offset.

It's still not 100% clear if they made any changes to the wheel or simply just tested it at a higher rating. I've got a few questions out there.
I agree with your offset question. But when you look at the pic at the other site you'll see the wheels seem to have an offset of 48. Forgestar claims you can go as far as 50. Now that means that shaving off 2 mm is responsible for a .7 lbs weight difference in the 18 x 8.5 version. And in the 18 x 12 version they probably used the same 68 offset. Remember, shaving off that offset saves weight. You be the judge.
Old 07-01-2010, 06:41 PM
  #78  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
HBC350's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,075
Received 15 Likes on 14 Posts
'18 C63A Cabriolet
Originally Posted by avengerboater
Very nice, Super!!! I'm sure they look even better in person!!
Damn, I love that Mars Red. I had a MR C350 and it was a looker as well. Very tough.
Old 07-01-2010, 06:57 PM
  #79  
Super Moderator Alumni
Thread Starter
 
superlubricity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 2,189
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
2011 GLK 350, 2013 GT-R, & 2013 RAM 1500
Info directly from Peter @ Forgestar:
Hello,

The wheel that was test was the original design but tested in Japan and the wheels were approved at 1520 per corner. So it wouldnt make a difference if you have the 18 inch F14 wheel then or now. We have sent out a letter but to our dealers since we normally don't sell direct and they can contact there customers of the load ratings we were approved for.

Peter Chaney | Forgestar Performance Wheels
Old 07-03-2010, 10:18 AM
  #80  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
hhughes1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
2013 Chevy 427 Torch Red
Wayne, thanks for taking the time to document your experience and turn us on to one of the best mod bargains available. I ordered a set from James yesterday in matte black. My preference was for the piano(gloss) black but the lead time was 16 weeks as opposed to 5 and my gloss blacks look like a matte finish after one track session anyway thanks to the brake dust. I also ordered a set of Toyo R888's(275/35 & 245/40) at an incredible price of $816. Everything should be installed and ready to go before the fall "campaign" and I might even make a Time attack event at Sebring in mid August.

Thanks again for your contributions, this is what a forum is all about!
Old 07-03-2010, 11:07 AM
  #81  
Administrator

 
amdeutsch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: www.Traben-Trarbach.de
Posts: 15,720
Received 28 Likes on 23 Posts
MPG+ ROLFCOPTER
Originally Posted by superlubricity
Info directly from Peter @ Forgestar:
Hello,

The wheel that was test was the original design but tested in Japan and the wheels were approved at 1520 per corner. So it wouldnt make a difference if you have the 18 inch F14 wheel then or now. We have sent out a letter but to our dealers since we normally don't sell direct and they can contact there customers of the load ratings we were approved for.

Peter Chaney | Forgestar Performance Wheels
In that case I'm wondering about the weight increase, as documented by the 2 different lab results. A 2 mm offset change doesn't have that much weight. And in case of the 18 x 12 version there was no offset change but a weight difference.
Old 07-03-2010, 12:07 PM
  #82  
Super Moderator Alumni
Thread Starter
 
superlubricity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 2,189
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
2011 GLK 350, 2013 GT-R, & 2013 RAM 1500
Originally Posted by amdeutsch
In that case I'm wondering about the weight increase, as documented by the 2 different lab results. A 2 mm offset change doesn't have that much weight. And in case of the 18 x 12 version there was no offset change but a weight difference.
I asked Peter the same question about the posted weight differences. I don't know the other circumstances so I'm not quick to judge just yet. I have personally witnessed two of the same spec wheels having variances in weight before. This could be the case here, but I'll wait for the source to answer directly.

I'll also be posting the letter from Forgestar to the Dealers once I get a copy from James.
Old 07-03-2010, 12:08 PM
  #83  
Super Moderator Alumni
Thread Starter
 
superlubricity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 2,189
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
2011 GLK 350, 2013 GT-R, & 2013 RAM 1500
Originally Posted by hhughes1
Wayne, thanks for taking the time to document your experience and turn us on to one of the best mod bargains available. I ordered a set from James yesterday in matte black. My preference was for the piano(gloss) black but the lead time was 16 weeks as opposed to 5 and my gloss blacks look like a matte finish after one track session anyway thanks to the brake dust. I also ordered a set of Toyo R888's(275/35 & 245/40) at an incredible price of $816. Everything should be installed and ready to go before the fall "campaign" and I might even make a Time attack event at Sebring in mid August.

Thanks again for your contributions, this is what a forum is all about!
I appreciate the kind words, HH. Glad I could help.
Old 07-07-2010, 12:45 AM
  #84  
Super Moderator Alumni
Thread Starter
 
superlubricity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 2,189
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
2011 GLK 350, 2013 GT-R, & 2013 RAM 1500
Originally Posted by superlubricity
I asked Peter the same question about the posted weight differences. I don't know the other circumstances so I'm not quick to judge just yet. I have personally witnessed two of the same spec wheels having variances in weight before. This could be the case here, but I'll wait for the source to answer directly.

I'll also be posting the letter from Forgestar to the Dealers once I get a copy from James.
More info directly from Peter @ Forgestar in response to the different wheel weights. Turns out they did make a new 18" wheel that is slightly heavier.
Our 18" before was load rated to 1200 lbs. We always put in safety margin into our engineering. We first tried 1350lbs a corner and it passed. Then we did 1520 and it passed. We don't test to failure. After we passed at 1520 we knew we had to put the safety margin back into the part and that is why the weight of the wheels went up about .7 of a lb. - Forgestar Custom Wheels
Quick Summary according to Peter:
  • Both the old and the new 18" Forgestar F14 wheels have been tested to 1520 lbs. Both passed.
  • The old ones are stamped "1200 lbs."
  • The new ones are stamped "1520 lbs."
  • The new ones are approximately 0.7 lbs heaver per wheel.
Old 07-07-2010, 01:05 AM
  #85  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
BerBer63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,257
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
2009 C63
picking mine up soon, they've been ready for a week. I haven't been sadly. I'll check to see what stamp and weights I got. Looking at possible rotors and lines to do at the same time.

hoping for the heavier wheels for a little more security...it'll be a total net gain of 2.8lbs i can live with

Last edited by BerBer63; 07-07-2010 at 01:10 AM.
Old 07-07-2010, 01:43 AM
  #86  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Even Money's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: PNW
Posts: 1,749
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
'15 VW GTI
Originally Posted by superlubricity
Our 18" before was load rated to 1200 lbs. We always put in safety margin into our engineering. We first tried 1350lbs a corner and it passed. Then we did 1520 and it passed. We don't test to failure. After we passed at 1520 we knew we had to put the safety margin back into the part and that is why the weight of the wheels went up about .7 of a lb. - Forgestar Custom Wheels
As I suspected, an increase in weight was necessary.

The question is, for the older 18" version, how close is 1520 lbs to the ultimate load, i.e., the load at which something will fail.

Let's say the safety margin is 1.5, then a 1200lbs rated wheel would fail at 1800 lbs. This is a bit oversimplified, as I don't know what they used for margin of safety in building these wheels. But you can be sure that the older version of 18" wheel is not able to take as much stress as the new version. I don't think it's an issue, unless you track the car to its limits where you could generate enough cornering force to approach the failure load. Just because you have a margin of safety, doesn't mean you can't get to that ultimate load.

It's also a bit odd that they rated these wheels originally at 1200 lbs, then passed a test at 1520 lbs. That's quite a difference that doesn't seem to square with only adding about 3.5% of material by weight.

That being said, I'm thinking of getting these wheels..although I'd like to see someone tracking them first.
Old 07-07-2010, 06:10 AM
  #87  
Administrator

 
amdeutsch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: www.Traben-Trarbach.de
Posts: 15,720
Received 28 Likes on 23 Posts
MPG+ ROLFCOPTER
Originally Posted by superlubricity
Info directly from Peter @ Forgestar:
Hello,

The wheel that was test was the original design but tested in Japan and the wheels were approved at 1520 per corner. So it wouldnt make a difference if you have the 18 inch F14 wheel then or now. We have sent out a letter but to our dealers since we normally don't sell direct and they can contact there customers of the load ratings we were approved for.

Peter Chaney | Forgestar Performance Wheels
Originally Posted by superlubricity
More info directly from Peter @ Forgestar in response to the different wheel weights. Turns out they did make a new 18" wheel that is slightly heavier.
Our 18" before was load rated to 1200 lbs. We always put in safety margin into our engineering. We first tried 1350lbs a corner and it passed. Then we did 1520 and it passed. We don't test to failure. After we passed at 1520 we knew we had to put the safety margin back into the part and that is why the weight of the wheels went up about .7 of a lb. - Forgestar Custom Wheels
Quick Summary according to Peter:
  • Both the old and the new 18" Forgestar F14 wheels have been tested to 1520 lbs. Both passed.
  • The old ones are stamped "1200 lbs."
  • The new ones are stamped "1520 lbs."
  • The new ones are approximately 0.7 lbs heaver per wheel.

Thanx for all your work superlubricity.


Interestingly in the 1st letter "it doesn't make a difference" and in the 2nd the claim about "safety margin". Also his weight increase claim seems to be the same as the one shown in the test data comparison for the one width/offset size but doesn't really address the larger width one with same offset but higher weight increase. It would be more believable if he would've stated a % instead of a x lbs figure since so much is dependent on size, width and offset.



For those looking for track info on these head to Porsche or BMW forums. AFAIK the main reason for this load/weight increase is because of BMW guys.
Old 07-07-2010, 05:37 PM
  #88  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
jmf003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Ann Arbor
Posts: 1,653
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
'03 SL55
Originally Posted by superlubricity
The rings included with the Forgestars are Poly Carbon Plastic. Part Number HR74-6660 from CWA. -> http://www.cwausa.com/HubCentricRings.html (Oddly the P/N doesn't appear on this old list)
...
Unfortunately, I could not find any available metal hub rings in the right size.
Just ran across a source that will fabricate metal hub centric rings: https://www.motorsport-tech.com/hub_rings.html

Not cheap but not a fortune, either.
Old 07-07-2010, 09:54 PM
  #89  
Super Moderator Alumni
Thread Starter
 
superlubricity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 2,189
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
2011 GLK 350, 2013 GT-R, & 2013 RAM 1500
I just ordered a 2nd set of F14s in Brushed Titanium . . .

18x8.5 ET40 and 18x9.5 ET50 wrapped in Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 Tires (245/40-18 and 275/35-18.)

Thank you James!
Old 07-07-2010, 10:11 PM
  #90  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Even Money's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: PNW
Posts: 1,749
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
'15 VW GTI
Originally Posted by superlubricity
I just ordered a 2nd set of F14s in Brushed Titanium . . .

18x8.5 ET40 and 18x9.5 ET50 wrapped in Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 Tires (245/40-18 and 275/35-18.)

Thank you James!
Nice! What's the wait time? I'm thinking of getting some...
Old 07-07-2010, 11:25 PM
  #91  
Super Moderator Alumni
Thread Starter
 
superlubricity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 2,189
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
2011 GLK 350, 2013 GT-R, & 2013 RAM 1500
Originally Posted by Even Money
Nice! What's the wait time? I'm thinking of getting some...
Likely 8 weeks.
Old 07-08-2010, 12:17 AM
  #92  
Super Moderator Alumni
Thread Starter
 
superlubricity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 2,189
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
2011 GLK 350, 2013 GT-R, & 2013 RAM 1500
Originally Posted by Peter@ACGSD
Looks killer. I'd lower the car another 0.5"-1.0" but the wheels look just right.
I might throw the H&R Springs this weekend.
Old 07-08-2010, 01:16 AM
  #93  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
BerBer63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,257
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
2009 C63
Originally Posted by superlubricity
I just ordered a 2nd set of F14s in Brushed Titanium . . .

18x8.5 ET40 and 18x9.5 ET50 wrapped in Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 Tires (245/40-18 and 275/35-18.)

Thank you James!
How come your getting new ones and not just powdercoating/painting your originals? You want the new 2.8lb heavier ones?
Old 07-08-2010, 01:38 AM
  #94  
Super Moderator Alumni
Thread Starter
 
superlubricity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 2,189
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
2011 GLK 350, 2013 GT-R, & 2013 RAM 1500
Originally Posted by chubbs032
How come your getting new ones and not just powdercoating/painting your originals? You want the new 2.8lb heavier ones?
Just personal preference. I really want to see how the brushed finish looks against the steel grey color. I like the idea of a bit more contrast and a hair more aggressive offset. It's unfortunate they'll be a bit heavier. The new offsets will also add some weight. Thankfully the PS2s are very light at only 24-lbs front and 26-lbs rear. I should break even or better in terms of total unsprung weight savings.
Old 07-08-2010, 07:46 AM
  #95  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
hhughes1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
2013 Chevy 427 Torch Red
Originally Posted by superlubricity
I just ordered a 2nd set of F14s in Brushed Titanium . . .

18x8.5 ET40 and 18x9.5 ET50 wrapped in Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 Tires (245/40-18 and 275/35-18.)

Thank you James!
Why did you change the offsets?
Old 07-08-2010, 12:38 PM
  #96  
Super Moderator Alumni
Thread Starter
 
superlubricity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 2,189
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
2011 GLK 350, 2013 GT-R, & 2013 RAM 1500
Originally Posted by hhughes1
Why did you change the offsets?
I'll be dropping the car 3/4" with the H&R Sport Springs so I want to push them out a hair. It won't be very noticeable @ +4mm F /+3mm R.

Absolutely no issues with the current offsets.
Old 07-10-2010, 05:08 PM
  #97  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
hhughes1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
2013 Chevy 427 Torch Red
Originally Posted by superlubricity
The rings included with the Forgestars are Poly Carbon Plastic. Part Number HR74-6660 from CWA. -> http://www.cwausa.com/HubCentricRings.html (Oddly the P/N doesn't appear on this old list)

Gorilla Automotive also makes a set in Poly Carbon Plastic. -> http://www.gorilla-auto.com/hub.centric.rings

I bought a set of the them from Amazon just in case I have issues with the CWAs. -> http://www.amazon.com/Gorilla-Automo...dp/B002805T38/ (They had one set in stock. Not anymore. )

Unfortunately, I could not find any available metal hub rings in the right size.
What is the center bore width on these wheels?
Old 07-10-2010, 07:21 PM
  #98  
Super Moderator Alumni
Thread Starter
 
superlubricity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 2,189
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
2011 GLK 350, 2013 GT-R, & 2013 RAM 1500
Originally Posted by hhughes1
What is the center bore width on these wheels?
74.1
Old 07-14-2010, 02:34 PM
  #99  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
BerBer63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,257
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
2009 C63
Picked up my wheels yesterday. Slightly confused since I thought they would be rated higher, but they say 1200 pounds. I thought it was 1220lbs and the new ones were 1500lb?

Sorry got numbers mixed up. Just thought by now they'd all be 1500

Last edited by BerBer63; 07-14-2010 at 03:10 PM.
Old 07-29-2010, 10:21 PM
  #100  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
hhughes1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
2013 Chevy 427 Torch Red
Originally Posted by jmf003
Just ran across a source that will fabricate metal hub centric rings: https://www.motorsport-tech.com/hub_rings.html

Not cheap but not a fortune, either.
I just ordered these to go with the Forgestar F14's that are on the way. Will update once they arrive.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 1 votes, 5.00 average.

Quick Reply: Write-up & Photos :: 18" Forgestar F14 Wheels & Nitto NT05 Tires :: 2010 C63



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:47 AM.