M156 V8 6.2L Vs Ferrari V8 4.5L
The ferrari 458 has a N/A engine with 4.5L and it's far more powerful than the M156... What makes Ferrari so good at extracting so much power from a smaller engine?
Please excuse my ignorance, just trying to learn

Thanks!!
The ferrari 458 has a N/A engine with 4.5L and it's far more powerful than the M156... What makes Ferrari so good at extracting so much power from a smaller engine?
Please excuse my ignorance, just trying to learn

Thanks!!
if the Ferrari only rev'd to 6 or 7000, it would probably only make ~450 hp.
of course then it wouldn't be a Ferrari.

from 6000 rpm to 9000 rpm, the 458 makes like another 150 hp!!!
of course the sls has the same engine and it makes the same power as the 458; bigger engine, less rev's...
Last edited by mainly; Oct 11, 2012 at 02:51 PM.
Kinda like how m3 makes nearly as much power as us but with way less displacement but it has less tq and has to rev like a Honda haha
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG

if the Ferrari only rev'd to 6 or 7000, it would probably only make ~450 hp.
of course then it wouldn't be a Ferrari.

from 6000 rpm to 9000 rpm, the 458 makes like another 150 hp!!!
of course the sls has the same engine and it makes the same power as the 458; bigger engine, less rev's...
The flat-plane or single-plane crankshaft has crank pins at 180°. They are imperfectly balanced and thus produce vibrations unless balance shafts are used, with a counter rotating pair flanking the crankshaft to counter second order vibration transverse to the crankshaft centerline. As it does not require counterweights, the crankshaft has less mass and thus inertia, allowing higher rpm and quicker acceleration. Flat-plane V8s on road cars come from Ferrari (every V8 model they ever made, from the 1973 308 GT4, to the new 458), Lotus (the Esprit V8), TVR (the Speed Eight) and McLaren (the MP4-12C). This design is popular in racing engines, the most famous example being the Cosworth DFV.[16]
The HP per liter is a function of it's direct fuel injection, compression ratio (12.5:1) & RPM...
Last edited by Swoody; Oct 11, 2012 at 05:26 PM.
I don't think that the "best" V8 should be based solely on most hp/liter or torque/liter. As Swoody mentioned, powered generated is influenced by compression ratio and RPM, but there are also other significant factors involved- the two most important to me is how much the manufacture wants to make the motor cost (which consequently translates to the vehicle's MSRP) and what the appropriate life span of the motor would be.
The CROSS-PLANE engines are imperfectly balanced and need counterweights.
The SINGLE-PLANE engines are better balanced and do not need the extra weights and revs much more freely and has a very characteristic engine note.
The sacrifice in the single plane engines is probably durability...
The ferrari 458 has a N/A engine with 4.5L and it's far more powerful than the M156... What makes Ferrari so good at extracting so much power from a smaller engine?
Please excuse my ignorance, just trying to learn

Thanks!!
Well my Dodge 3500 Diesel doesn't win many races unfortunately.
But I can squeal the tires off the line with a trailer and skid steer on the back of it.
TORQUE GETS U OFF THE LINE, HORSEPOWER WINS RACES.
The S65 and engine in the 458 develop a lot of power, as others have said, for their size as they have very high red lines. Power is a function of torque and RPM. If the M156 could rev to 9,000 RPM it would generate a sh$t load of HP!!
I see diesel trucks running 10s at the track every weekend, they only rev to 3000rpm and dont rev freely.
Torque gets you off the line and HP wins the race.
just the same as there is no such thing as time in the universe. it is only humans way of calculating distance and motion as a function of our lives. if there is no such thing as time, there is definitely no such thing as horsepower.....
besides, you can't look at hp and tq without including weight and gearing into the overall equation. a Ferrari motor would suck in a dump truck....


