SLS transmission in C63
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
FYI the MCT can hold more power than the DCT, my supercharged C BS makes more power than my supercharged SLS BS for the simple fact that the DCT can't take any more abuse....just saying.
FYI the MCT can hold more power than the DCT, my supercharged C BS makes more power than my supercharged SLS BS for the simple fact that the DCT can't take any more abuse....just saying.
It being too heavy is a load of crap.
Honestly I am thinking of trying an audi out they make a twin turbo V8 with DCT in the S6 and and RS7 both of which with a tune make 550hp 550lb tq+ can't recall the exact number but that with DCT and AWD. I just view DCT plus turbo cars as a must, the DCT can make up for quite a bit of less power by its faster shift times. Plus when you floor a DCT it grabs a lower gear a heck of a lot faster, again the porsche 991 made me cry.
I just can't deal with the the MCT anymore, its really a disappointment when you know what else is on the market, as I told them at the AMG event MCT is 10 year old E46 M3 technology with a minor upgrade.
Are you REALLY missing out on... what... a 1 millisecond faster shift that a DCT gives? I mean really? A DCT has an ever so slightly snappier feel to it, but any real measurable advantage the DCT yields would only be seen on the track. For the streets, the 7 speedshift is IMO just perfect.
And yes, I drove an M3 before buying my C63 and the DCT was okay, nice… sure. But it wasn’t this night and day difference. It had a very, very slightly snappier feel to it. Paddels may have responded 1/100ths of a second faster. That’s all. So the F what?
I’ll take all the other benefits the C63 hasover the M3’s DCT anyday of the week.
It being too heavy is a load of crap.
Honestly I am thinking of trying an audi out they make a twin turbo V8 with DCT in the S6 and and RS7 both of which with a tune make 550hp 550lb tq+ can't recall the exact number but that with DCT and AWD. I just view DCT plus turbo cars as a must, the DCT can make up for quite a bit of less power by its faster shift times. Plus when you floor a DCT it grabs a lower gear a heck of a lot faster, again the porsche 991 made me cry.
I just can't deal with the the MCT anymore, its really a disappointment when you know what else is on the market, as I told them at the AMG event MCT is 10 year old E46 M3 technology with a minor upgrade.
DCT's are a little heavier than standard manual transmissions, but not any heavier than MBZ MCT automatic. MB uses it for a few reasons … they like everything "in house" … compared to BMW, which has it's DCT's made by Getrag. It's true a DCT can't handle as much torque as an MCT … it's also more complex to build and therefor more expensive to produce.
BTW, I owned an E46 M3 and an E63 M6 both with SMG … it wasn't for everyone, but I loved that transmission … shifts were brutal at 8000
AAre you REALLY missing out on... what... a 1 millisecond faster shift that a DCT gives? I mean really? DCT has an ever so slightly snappier feel to it, but any real measurable advantage the DCT yields would only be seen on the track. For the streets, the 7 speedshift is IMO just perfect.
And yes, I drove an M3 before buying my C63 and the DCT was okay, nice… sure. But it wasn’t this night and day difference. It had a very, very slightly snappier feel to it. Paddels may have responded 1/100ths of a second faster. That’s all. So the F what?
I’ll take all the other benefits the C63 hasover the M3’s DCT anyday of the week.
… either you're emotional towards your MBZ, which I can understand (btw, I currently own one and had a few over the years), or you don't know how a DCT really works. To answer your question, it is measurable on the street in daily driving, not just on a race track. Like I already mentioned in my previous post, there is no torque interruption between shifts. This is what truly differentiates it from any other transmission. This is achieved by using 2 sub drives … one for even gears, one for odd gears coupled to the engine with 2 clutches. This is what makes it "seamless".
It's all about how efficient the power is "transmitted" to the ground.
Revise the tune and strip the torque management out, make revisions to the valve body and you'll make gear shifts feel much faster & snappy. When I was heavy into drag racing my 700rwhp SRT8 (which used a Mercedes NAG1 transmission), you could pick up .2 to .3 tenths just by a valve body revisions (raised shift pressure) and stripping the torque management via the ECU. Gear shifts were fast and hard hitting... zero softness during the shift.
Now I don't doubt a DCT is better - I just don't feel the revised 2012+ Speedshift MTC is the "slush box" everyone is making it out to be.
Last edited by mdgrwl; Nov 14, 2013 at 06:26 PM.
I just hope that if the new C55 uses the MCT, it takes the programming from the BS, because it truly is a great gearbox that's damn close to a DCT in shift response. Nothing beats a dual clutch though, I still miss my old GTI DSG's gearbox, it was perfect, street or track, and slightly better than the CLA45's.

Oh and I love the MCT, DCT might be instant but the 100 millisecond shift pops are so entertaining especially with headers

I'm deciding to either get a 991 GT3 or a 991 TT … however, my dilemma is both come in a PDK … Porsche spend all that money on developing a DCT when the old MBZ supplied slush box they used for sooooooo many years did the trick

… who knew, you're smarter than their engineers!
Oh and I agree MB autos suck but that doesn't mean I can't enjoy my MCT
It being too heavy is a load of crap.
Honestly I am thinking of trying an audi out they make a twin turbo V8 with DCT in the S6 and and RS7 both of which with a tune make 550hp 550lb tq+ can't recall the exact number but that with DCT and AWD. I just view DCT plus turbo cars as a must, the DCT can make up for quite a bit of less power by its faster shift times. Plus when you floor a DCT it grabs a lower gear a heck of a lot faster, again the porsche 991 made me cry.
I just can't deal with the the MCT anymore, its really a disappointment when you know what else is on the market, as I told them at the AMG event MCT is 10 year old E46 M3 technology with a minor upgrade.
However, in the S6, a $1200 tune and street tires will launch this 4400 lb behemoth to 60 in 3.7 seconds and run the 1/4 mile in 11.49 seconds. Quite the family car. Best car I've owned so far. Only complaint is the transmission programming.
Last edited by Dr Chill; Nov 15, 2013 at 08:30 AM.
DCT is the closest automated gearbox that can match the experience of a proper 3 pedal gearbox, in that its downshifts/upshifts occur almost exactly when you want in manual mode.
The MCT is great at upshifts in auto Sport + mode, but in manual mode the paddles are laggy and downshifts are not very responsive.
I've been infatuated with the C63 since 2009, but just could not justify getting it due to the gearbox alone. The MCT is a huge improvement over the 7g tronic tranny in the pre-12 C63's IMO, but still subpar compared to what's out there IMHO.
I recently test drove the new BMW 435i and even the sport auto in that car is much more responsive than the MCT.
If MB mated a proper gearbox to that glorious M156 engine...man, life would be complete for me! It doesn't even need to be a true DCT, just make the dang thing more responsive in manual mode and it'll be a winner IMHO.
If the next gen C63 comes with a better gearbox (I highly doubt AMG would disappoint in the power department) then I'm ordering one ASAP. Don't even care that it's a first year model lol
Last edited by csexty3; Nov 15, 2013 at 11:15 AM.
Oh and I agree MB autos suck but that doesn't mean I can't enjoy my MCT
… anyhow, a DCT is a manual transmission that has been "automated", but instead of 1 has 2 sub drives and 2 clutches. One sub drive for odd gears with it's own clutch and one for even gears, also with it's own clutch. When the gear lever is pulled, whether you shift up or down, it's only a matter of opening one clutch and closing the other … going back and forth between sub drives … which takes 8 milliseconds … making it a "seamless" power transmission to the ground without "shift shock" or "torque interruption".








