Shell Rotella T6 New Formulation




Uhhhhh... those say the same thing but look different. Checked the dates on the bottles, and on the right are 2015-16, and on the left were 2017. Ok. So did a quick Google machine search, and it turns out that Shell changed the bottle design AND the formulation in order to meet the newest API diesel standard CK-4. They also no longer claim that it meets any of the API gasoline standards.
So I bought every old formulation gallon jug they had left (6).
Still researching what this means exactly - if it still has the same additive and anti-wear package that made the previous formulation so good, if they reduced the levels of anti-wear additives, whether the gasoline certification was withdrawn for emission purposes (too much phosphorous), if the new formulation is even better - just don't know yet.
Not as much info on BITOG as I thought there would be with its popularity. I did find the following on a sport bike forum, which puts me more at ease:
There was a provision in the previous diesel standards to allow these oils to meet the S standards despite this. But now, the oil must meet all of the standard, so oils with high phosphorus will not carry S standard approval.
This is just a technicality, so it looks like there's nothing to worry about and you can use the improved T6.
Here is the full text:
“In order for a diesel engine oil to claim an ‘S’ category, it must now meet all of the gasoline category’s criteria, including the limit on phosphorous levels,” Negri continues. “Phosphorous has long demonstrated proven protective qualities versus ashless chemistries in diesel engines, but has also been known to shorten the life of automotive catalyst systems in gasoline engines. This means that diesel engine oil must be below 0.08% phosphorous to claim an ‘S’ category approval [the CJ-4 specification allows up to 0.12% phosphorous].”
The loophole that allows higher phosphorous levels from diesel engine oils when used in gasoline engines will be effectively closed. In practical terms, this will create a clear line in the sand between diesel-only formulations (“high phosphorous”) and universal oils (“low phosphorous”).
Some links (still wading through these):
https://zzrbikes.com/threads/85313-C...tella-T6-5W-40
https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/ub...%22_Rotella_T6 (these guys think the oil has been ruined)
https://forums.nasioc.com/forums/sho....php?t=2785176
https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/ub...la_T6_May_2017




https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/ub...la_T6_May_2017
Here's a VOA of the old stuff for comparison: https://www.bobistheoilguy.com/forum...Number=2330040
Zinc looks like it's down on the new stuff. No more Moly and double the Boron too. It's also a lot thicker at higher temps. Hmm.
Need to do more research. Great find on that new VOA, it answers a lot of questions. Thanks again dude.
https://www.bobistheoilguy.com/forum...Number=2236976
https://www.bobistheoilguy.com/forum...14#Post2089814
I know it's been beaten to death but how much of a difference is there between 8100 and t6?
On a side note, you can also buy them in 5 gallon buckets.
http://www.oreillyauto.com/site/c/de...1189&ppt=C0252




Car took 2.5gal of T6 last night. 44O increases capacity on changes by 2-3qt.
https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/ub...tio#Post530330
https://www.bobistheoilguy.com/forum...202#Post530202
Last edited by BLKROKT; Jun 18, 2017 at 09:34 AM.




Trending Topics




The Best of Mercedes & AMG




The other 2 samples look like Mobil 1?
What are your thoughts so far with the T6?
Last edited by bhamg; Jun 18, 2017 at 09:15 PM.





The first sample (bottom row) is Mobil 1 0W40 and the second sample is MB oil 229.5 5W40 (also Shell?). The viscosity in the MB 229.5 looks a little more stable than the M1 or T6 but it also looks like I took it on longer drives and warmed it up for longer periods as there is no water or fuel in it. The wear metals are definitely showing improvement with the Shell T6 in spite of the water and fuel showing in the sample.
I like the T6 so far and refilled with it but which T6 formulation I am not sure. The jug said 02Nov2016 so maybe it has the new formulation but the old label API CJ-4/SM as the new label was not being changed until Dec. 1 2016. I think that is what it said in the link. The new formulation looks fine to me anyway. I will do another UOA mid season and will post it up at that time. I do like the way the engine feels on the T6 and no tapping after the car has been sitting for a while. That makes me feel better about the cams and tappets.




Just remember that Shell has admitted they placed CK-4 oils into CJ-4 bottles during the transition period rather than to throw away all those containers.
There is no telling which API you have in the CJ-4 bottle without lab testing...if I understand this topic correctly.
______________
Shell admitted doing this beginning in August 2016, in case you want to look at dates on bottles.

















Having digested them now they just underscore how much boils down to personal preferences and beliefs. The facts rarely support absolutes.



