BMS 2018 C63 JB4 Dragy Testing
Was great boost weather tonight (55F) so decided to head over to the private track for a few pulls.
Testing was done in our 2018 C63 base model, JB4, BMS intake, 30% E85 fuel. JB4 tuning was set to map5 (+7psi over stock peak), launch mode active, and to improve traction I used the JB4's boost by gear option to reduce boost by 4psi in 1st.
Overall happy with the best run of 11.5@127mph. If we could get that 60' down in the 1.7s range where it should be, look out!

Last edited by BMS; Nov 19, 2018 at 01:02 AM.
1) is it fair to say that the 30% E85 you are using makes the CA limited 91 octane perform like 93 octane? Or, if it effectively better than straight 93?
2) I see you used launch control, but was traction control left along (ie in sport or sport + and leaving ESC alone), or was it in the slippier mode that it uses when in Race or the ESC is pressed once?
Traction control fully off (hold button for 5 seconds), not sure if launch mode will engage otherwise?
Anyway, is there a strong reason for testing on a non-pump gas setup, when probably 95+% of your customers will simply be running 93 or 91? Hopefully the bulk of the R&D/tuning is around that.
Last edited by ezatnova; Nov 19, 2018 at 12:37 PM.
There are also 91 octane and 93 octane maps enabled that can be selected on the fly using the smart phone app. In terms of their perforamnce we'll have to see. I'm not holding out much hope for 91 octane, it's really poor fuel and often requires detuning. But 93 should be able to produce similar results. Also note we have a non-S model. We'll have to evaluate how those respond as well.
There are also 91 octane and 93 octane maps enabled that can be selected on the fly using the smart phone app. In terms of their perforamnce we'll have to see. I'm not holding out much hope for 91 octane, it's really poor fuel and often requires detuning. But 93 should be able to produce similar results. Also note we have a non-S model. We'll have to evaluate how those respond as well.
Trending Topics
EU uses RON (Research Octane Number)
NA uses AKI = [RON + MON (Motor Octane Number)] / 2
MON is approximately 8-12 points lower than RON.
Since you're taking the average, the EU rating should be reduced by 4-6 points to get the North American AKI equivalent.
That brings your rating down to around 93 octane equivalent in North America. In Canada, we have 93/94 Octane readily available.
Last edited by KJ; Nov 19, 2018 at 05:19 PM.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
anyway you guys can run the test with a wider rear tire...
i think there is member running that time with eurocharged...
really want to see that tire plus adjustable boost for the lower gears and see what this car can do...
thank you
I will give it a go and report back

Last edited by ezatnova; Nov 20, 2018 at 03:46 PM.
There are also 91 octane and 93 octane maps enabled that can be selected on the fly using the smart phone app. In terms of their perforamnce we'll have to see. I'm not holding out much hope for 91 octane, it's really poor fuel and often requires detuning. But 93 should be able to produce similar results. Also note we have a non-S model. We'll have to evaluate how those respond as well.









