K&N
http://www.bmcairfilter.com/VisCart.asp
Tom
Tom
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
no worries about oil.
Autohausaz.com has them for both 55's and 65's
K/N and green are snake oil
$200 for what ever brand mentioned is a pool of snake oil
what do they do worth 200 bucks?Except make your wallet thinner
no worries about oil.
Autohausaz.com has them for both 55's and 65's
K/N and green are snake oil
$200 for what ever brand mentioned is a pool of snake oil
what do they do worth 200 bucks?Except make your wallet thinner

http://www.absolutelydriven.com/foru...ghlight=filter
Tom
no worries about oil.
Autohausaz.com has them for both 55's and 65's
K/N and green are snake oil
$200 for what ever brand mentioned is a pool of snake oil
what do they do worth 200 bucks?Except make your wallet thinner

no difference. And it's a bit rude to say you do not have a clue!! them insults
again. OK where is the proof that changing to BMC or K&N filters significantly
increase your horse power, just another trinket for the list of pointless
purchases. Please let's have proof not insults!
no difference. And it's a bit rude to say you do not have a clue!! them insults
again. OK where is the proof that changing to BMC or K&N filters significantly
increase your horse power, just another trinket for the list of pointless
purchases. Please let's have proof not insults!


His tone deserved the response he got.... you reap what you sow.... (and that goes for you too)
Tom
Last edited by TMC M5; Apr 21, 2009 at 10:10 AM.
no worries about oil.
Autohausaz.com has them for both 55's and 65's
K/N and green are snake oil
$200 for what ever brand mentioned is a pool of snake oil
what do they do worth 200 bucks?Except make your wallet thinner

no difference. And it's a bit rude to say you do not have a clue!! them insults
again. OK where is the proof that changing to BMC or K&N filters significantly
increase your horse power, just another trinket for the list of pointless
purchases. Please let's have proof not insults!


True, you can "gain" a weight savings and improve your power-to-weight ratio by having less fuel (gasoline weighs approximately 6lbs per gallon). But that argument is moot because you will be getting the benefit of both when you run at the track (unless you like carrying extra weight for no reason). So in effect that 2% rwhp increase is seen in conjunction with a 2% weight savings. This only further improves the performance of the car.
Tom
Now, on topic, I've been impressed by airflow charts posted after BMC fitment. I've also heard good things about K&N, though some complain about their oily-ness. The gains from either one are small, but small gains are what it's all about at the drags.
http://www.autohausaz.com/search/pro...2@Air%20Filter
A.$50 a set
B.I know what I speak of.
C.You are another of the more money,must be better ilk.
D.At 604 H.P. 10 H.P. is statistically a Non sequitur.
E.look it up if you don't comprehend what that means.
F.Is that the proof of what spending 200 bucks on a set of air filters results in?Is that your dyno run?I am so glad that you can either afford to own your own dyno or that you pay for dyno time,to prove a blip in RWHP that could simply be accounted for in the 1.14F difference in temp or even how the operator of the dyno brake throttled up the engine.
G.Someone needs a clue.Begin your search at the hall mirror

P.S. that link.
another guy that really needs a good look in the mirror to help find a clue."Good volume to the air box" You be sure to follow him in line for your sprintbooster,Those are only about 3-4 hundred dollars of snake oil for what even the maker claims is only the feeling of more power.Okay?Okay.
Next
Last edited by ohlord; Apr 21, 2009 at 12:13 PM.
http://www.autohausaz.com/search/pro...2@Air%20Filter
A.$50 a set
B.I know what I speak of.
C.You are another of the more money,must be better ilk.
D.At 604 H.P. 10 H.P. is statistically a Non sequitur.
E.look it up if you don't comprehend what that means.
F.Is that the proof of what spending 200 bucks on a set of air filters results in?Is that your dyno run?I am so glad that you can either afford to own your own dyno or that you pay for dyno time,to prove a blip in RWHP that could simply be accounted for in the 1.14F difference in temp or even how the operator of the dyno brake throttled up the engine.
G.Someone needs a clue.Begin your search at the hall mirror

P.S. that link.
another guy that really needs a good look in the mirror to help find a clue."Good volume to the air box" You be sure to follow him in line for your sprintbooster,Okay?Okay.Next
Secondly, we are talking REAR WHEEL HORSEPOWER not the manufacturer's figure at the flywheel, which you quoted.
I am sorry to break this to you, but you have no knowledge of the V12 TT platform. There aren't very many options out there for performance intake upgrades. The only option until recently is a RENNtech air box which they charge $5,600 for and claim an additional 15hp at the crank...you would have thought by your comments that I was advocating that purchase...

No that isn't my dyno run...the person who did it bit the bullet to see if an air filter made any difference in performance. He was tired of people using their butt-dyno as the determinate of whether a performance mod works or not.
If you would look a little closer at the dynos you would notice that the run with OEM filters was done in slightly lower humidity and ever so slightly better barometric pressure. When you correct these dynos to SAE, the aftermarket filter run is corrected upward 1.2% and the run with OEM filter is corrected upwards 1.1%. So peak SAE corrected is 528.51rwhp for aftermarket filter vs 518.60rwhp. Thank you for pointing out both a further advantage (albeit small) of the aftermarket filter...and your lack of knowledge.

http://wahiduddin.net/calc/calc_hp_dp.htm
Tom
Last edited by TMC M5; Apr 21, 2009 at 01:43 PM.
Also, you will notice that we are looking at runs 6 and 8 in a span of 17 minutes. Changing the filters is a 5-10 minute activity because you need to unscrew a number of bolts on each airbox. There was also apparently a run #7 in between. So the car probably wasn't totally cooled down. That could be causing the minor "hit to low end torque".
Tom

Tom


