CLA 45 AMG (C117) 2013 to 2018

engine reliability??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 01-12-2014, 08:33 AM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
JoaoMerc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
CL203(06) C207(10)
engine reliability??

Hey there, I wanted to know your thoughts regarding this engine? I have read that this engine was properly prepared and tested by AMG, internals and forged and reinforced and the engine is almost to the point of motor racing.

But still 26 psi on a turbo for a road car is something that makes us think. Obviously we have to take certain precautions, but what reliably can we expect from this engine?
Old 01-12-2014, 06:37 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
jamesyot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: CT
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
03 Lexus IS300 (old faithful) / 91 3000GT VR-4 / 14 CLA45 AMG / 11 BMW X6M
Im sure its much more reliable than a v12 bi turbo lol. This is suppose to be the best 4 cylinder production engine ever. With a bunch of options this thing is almost 70 thousand. 70 thousand for a FOUR cylinder damn I hope its reliable lol.
Old 01-13-2014, 01:23 PM
  #3  
Super Member
 
msheredy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Diego
Posts: 617
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
MB
Originally Posted by JoaoMerc
Hey there, I wanted to know your thoughts regarding this engine? I have read that this engine was properly prepared and tested by AMG, internals and forged and reinforced and the engine is almost to the point of motor racing.

But still 26 psi on a turbo for a road car is something that makes us think. Obviously we have to take certain precautions, but what reliably can we expect from this engine?
Remember you're not going to be pushing the 26#s every second of every mile. As long as you change the oil regularly and, in my opinion, make sure you get the engine and trans up to operating temps before hammering down on it this should be a reliable little bugger.
Old 01-13-2014, 02:30 PM
  #4  
Banned
 
Girard@ACGautomotive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 2,914
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
a car
Had mine for a month now... It still starts every morning. More reliable than my other cars.
Old 01-14-2014, 07:26 AM
  #5  
Member
Thread Starter
 
JoaoMerc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
CL203(06) C207(10)
AMG Performance Suspension

Thank you all for your responses. Now another topic (off-topic...) that worries ''me'' is the optional AMG Performance Suspension, is it really too hard to live with? It will be not a trackday car but of course there will be opportunity to pull the power in some nice B-roads, but it's really worth?? In addition to this, the configuration will be with the 19'' rims and AMG performance seats. Should be an extra to discard or to go for?
Old 01-14-2014, 09:40 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
jamesyot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: CT
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
03 Lexus IS300 (old faithful) / 91 3000GT VR-4 / 14 CLA45 AMG / 11 BMW X6M
Originally Posted by JoaoMerc
Thank you all for your responses. Now another topic (off-topic...) that worries ''me'' is the optional AMG Performance Suspension, is it really too hard to live with? It will be not a trackday car but of course there will be opportunity to pull the power in some nice B-roads, but it's really worth?? In addition to this, the configuration will be with the 19'' rims and AMG performance seats. Should be an extra to discard or to go for?
The stock suspension is very nice. The stock 18 inch rims are very nice and the stock seats are very nice. If you got money to blow then go ahead and order the upgraded stuff. I think its funny that all these people think these extras make or break the car. All I got was the performance exhaust, steering wheel, center caps, and the multi media. People drool over my car on the daily.
Old 01-14-2014, 11:37 AM
  #7  
Super Member
 
ML63 AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 963
Received 58 Likes on 43 Posts
CL63 AMG
26psi is momentary peak boost. Most of the time ECU is probably running 20-22psi if I had to take a guess. They have torque limiters too in the ECU (which lowers boost of course).

The motor is not what I would be worried about, it's the transmission and the PTU power splitter. They are not designed to take stupid power. I bet 450-460 is all they can take before you start running into issues
Old 01-14-2014, 03:48 PM
  #8  
PLATINUM SPONSOR
 
Exotic-metal55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,810
Received 62 Likes on 53 Posts
2003 CL55
Should be very reliable and I of course would have no issues going 30 PSI
__________________



E63 Biturbo, UPD Cold Air induction kit, UPD performance crank pulley and UPD adjustable rear suspension with ride height adjustment.

CL55 UPD Cold Air Boost kit, UPD 3000 stall converter, UPD 77mm SC clutched pulley and beltwrap kit, Custom long tubes, UPD crank pulley , UPD suspension kit, UPD SC pulley, Aux. HE, Trunk tank w/rule 2000 pump, Mezeire pump, UPD 5pc idler set, Aluminum rotor hats.

www.ultimatepd.com
instagram @ultimate_pd
facebook.com/ultimatepd
Old 01-14-2014, 05:04 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
jamesyot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: CT
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
03 Lexus IS300 (old faithful) / 91 3000GT VR-4 / 14 CLA45 AMG / 11 BMW X6M
Originally Posted by Exotic-metal55
Should be very reliable and I of course would have no issues going 30 PSI
I like this guy. He is way cooler than all the peeps that like 26psi omg soo crazy omg omg no more boost waaa waaa lol
Old 01-15-2014, 05:41 PM
  #10  
Member
 
Flipstylephoto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CLA 45
In regards to the sport suspension, I wouldnt' say it's all that rough. I'm used to driving Big vehicles with huge tires. Maybe i'm just to into how well it eases into 80mph and you don't even notice. lol.

as far as the motor, everything i've read leads to it being very stout and handling even more power than it already has. I'll definitely be doing a tune to up the power once they've been around and everyone else comes away with no problems lol.
Old 02-06-2014, 01:12 PM
  #11  
Former Vendor of MBWorld
 
VividRacing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 6,070
Received 17 Likes on 17 Posts
G63, C190 AMG GTC, W209 CLK63 BS, W208 CLK430
26 PSI is also relative, you have to remember 26 PS from this turbo is not the same as 26 PSI from a larger turbo

I have been driving my Evo every day for 4 years @ 28 PSI, I think Mercedes has this handled as long as the keep the car stock. Reliability once you start modifying it is anyone's guess but typically if you start with a solid vehicle and mod it correctly things are okay
Old 02-06-2014, 02:44 PM
  #12  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Quadcammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Clifton, NJ
Posts: 4,949
Likes: 0
Received 38 Likes on 33 Posts
96 and 08 911 turbos
Originally Posted by VividRacing
26 PSI is also relative, you have to remember 26 PS from this turbo is not the same as 26 PSI from a larger turbo
hows that exactly?
Old 02-06-2014, 02:59 PM
  #13  
Former Vendor of MBWorld
 
VividRacing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 6,070
Received 17 Likes on 17 Posts
G63, C190 AMG GTC, W209 CLK63 BS, W208 CLK430
Originally Posted by Quadcammer
hows that exactly?
Explained simply, a larger turbo forcing 26 PSI into the motor is moving a larger amount of air in order to reach that same amount of pressure

For example, you can run 26 LBS of boost on a stock turbo ALL DAY as that is what Mercedes built the car for

but say you strap something like a Garret GT40 on the car, 26 PSI could be too much for it to handle

Last edited by VividRacing; 02-06-2014 at 03:02 PM.
Old 02-06-2014, 04:02 PM
  #14  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Valvestud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 2,787
Received 383 Likes on 342 Posts
2014 E63 AMGs, 2015 F-150 Lariat, 2010 Porsche C4S
Originally Posted by VividRacing
Explained simply, a larger turbo forcing 26 PSI into the motor is moving a larger amount of air in order to reach that same amount of pressure

For example, you can run 26 LBS of boost on a stock turbo ALL DAY as that is what Mercedes built the car for

but say you strap something like a Garret GT40 on the car, 26 PSI could be too much for it to handle
Hmmm, Makes no sense to me either. I deal in valving and pressures all day. 26 PSI is 26 PSI. Doesn't matter how it gets there in terms of volume applied..... right?
Old 02-06-2014, 04:40 PM
  #15  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Quadcammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Clifton, NJ
Posts: 4,949
Likes: 0
Received 38 Likes on 33 Posts
96 and 08 911 turbos
Originally Posted by VividRacing
Explained simply, a larger turbo forcing 26 PSI into the motor is moving a larger amount of air in order to reach that same amount of pressure

For example, you can run 26 LBS of boost on a stock turbo ALL DAY as that is what Mercedes built the car for

but say you strap something like a Garret GT40 on the car, 26 PSI could be too much for it to handle
hmm, I'm not sure I agree. If the resistance is the same (i.e. you haven't changed anything in the intake/heads/exhaust, etc) a greater flow from the larger turbo should result in more boost, just as going to a smaller pulley on a supercharger results in more boost.

Furthermore, while the boost will be the same, the larger compressor will likely be more efficient, so you end up with a cooler intake charge, thereby you should make more power. Obviously you'd need more fueling for that, but thats a given.
Old 02-06-2014, 07:29 PM
  #16  
Former Vendor of MBWorld
 
VividRacing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 6,070
Received 17 Likes on 17 Posts
G63, C190 AMG GTC, W209 CLK63 BS, W208 CLK430
Originally Posted by Valvestud
Hmmm, Makes no sense to me either. I deal in valving and pressures all day. 26 PSI is 26 PSI. Doesn't matter how it gets there in terms of volume applied..... right?
Originally Posted by Quadcammer
hmm, I'm not sure I agree. If the resistance is the same (i.e. you haven't changed anything in the intake/heads/exhaust, etc) a greater flow from the larger turbo should result in more boost, just as going to a smaller pulley on a supercharger results in more boost.

Furthermore, while the boost will be the same, the larger compressor will likely be more efficient, so you end up with a cooler intake charge, thereby you should make more power. Obviously you'd need more fueling for that, but thats a given.
Exactly, 26 PSI is 26 PSI but a larger compressor and housing is flowing more air at the same pressure. You've changed the resistance a lot by having a larger turbo that flows better.
Old 02-06-2014, 07:36 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
eason's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 417
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
W212 E63
water hose is the best example. 26PSI garden hose vs 26PSI fire truck hose. The big hose will always move more volume.
Old 02-06-2014, 07:51 PM
  #18  
Former Vendor of MBWorld
 
VividRacing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 6,070
Received 17 Likes on 17 Posts
G63, C190 AMG GTC, W209 CLK63 BS, W208 CLK430
Originally Posted by eason
water hose is the best example. 26PSI garden hose vs 26PSI fire truck hose. The big hose will always move more volume.
I was going to say a straw but didn't think it made sense, that makes a lot more sense! Thank you
Old 02-06-2014, 10:26 PM
  #19  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Jons95c36amg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Desert
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
02 CLK 55 AMG,09 C63 loaded with P30
Its a new motor in its first year of production. Time will tell if its reliable. Want reliable? Go NA.
Old 02-07-2014, 11:20 AM
  #20  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Quadcammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Clifton, NJ
Posts: 4,949
Likes: 0
Received 38 Likes on 33 Posts
96 and 08 911 turbos
Originally Posted by eason
water hose is the best example. 26PSI garden hose vs 26PSI fire truck hose. The big hose will always move more volume.
thats a given, but that relates to the parts downstream of the turbo or water pump in your example.

What you are saying is that if you enlarged the intake track, intake manifold, intake ports, etcs, (i.e. made the hose bigger) you would flow more air, and I don't disagree.

My point would be that if you put a bigger water pump on the garden hose, you end up with a higher psi because the restriction source has remained the same.
Old 02-07-2014, 12:06 PM
  #21  
Former Vendor of MBWorld
 
VividRacing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 6,070
Received 17 Likes on 17 Posts
G63, C190 AMG GTC, W209 CLK63 BS, W208 CLK430
Originally Posted by Quadcammer
thats a given, but that relates to the parts downstream of the turbo or water pump in your example.

What you are saying is that if you enlarged the intake track, intake manifold, intake ports, etcs, (i.e. made the hose bigger) you would flow more air, and I don't disagree.

My point would be that if you put a bigger water pump on the garden hose, you end up with a higher psi because the restriction source has remained the same.
That's also true but we have boost controllers and wastegates that keep the pressure regulated

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: engine reliability??



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:44 PM.