am i useless or is my clk faulty?

Oct 13, 2002 | 05:08 PM

Pffelan

Thread Starter

Senior Member

Joined: Nov 2001

Posts: 254

Likes: 0

From: Chorley Lancashire England

CLK 430 Coupe + MGF + 1980 Camaro

am i useless or is my clk faulty?

went to the drag strip this weekend.... ran a 15.2?
surely the car is quicker than this?

i am blaming the track temp of about 4deg celcius... cos i couldnt get any traction off the line?

your comments on my ineptness pls...

never got to run with the esp on cos it started raining

Oct 13, 2002 | 07:49 PM

RJC

MBWorld Fanatic!

Joined: Feb 2002

Posts: 6,061

Likes: 326

From: 2000 ft over the FL coast in a B-17

Various

Re: am i useless or is my clk faulty?

Quote:

Originally posted by Pffelan
went to the drag strip this weekend.... ran a 15.2?
surely the car is quicker than this?

i am blaming the track temp of about 4deg celcius... cos i couldnt get any traction off the line?

your comments on my ineptness pls...

never got to run with the esp on cos it started raining

Let me begin by saying that CLK 430's are not designed to drag race, these are gran touring cars. The avg 1/4 mile times and trap speeds are approx. 14.5@99mph. What was your trap speed? Did you brake torque the car on launch as this will greatly enhance launch. Did you shift or let the car shift as I have read full auto works best with brake torqueing. Also temp, humidity and track conditions all play a part and some cars are just faster than others.What year is your car and the mileage? Has it had a hard life, lot's of redline shifts etc? 15.2 is off by quite a bit though and it's important to answer my questions in order to determine if your car is slower than it should be. Also the best way to see if your car is off, see if you can drive a friends, preferably at the track to measure times, or just see if it really feels faster.

RJC

Last edited by RJC; Oct 13, 2002 at 07:52 PM.

Oct 14, 2002 | 03:40 AM

Pffelan

Thread Starter

Senior Member

Joined: Nov 2001

Posts: 254

Likes: 0

From: Chorley Lancashire England

CLK 430 Coupe + MGF + 1980 Camaro

leftfoot brake at 1500 rpm...

let the car shift...

got creamed....

the wierd thing was on the way to the track was racing 400bhp evo and 300bhp scooby and was not getting creamed down the motorways?

its like there was no torque low down? trap time was 95?

Oct 14, 2002 | 03:44 AM

Pffelan

Thread Starter

Senior Member

Joined: Nov 2001

Posts: 254

Likes: 0

From: Chorley Lancashire England

CLK 430 Coupe + MGF + 1980 Camaro

only other thought is what is the max octane a clk can run on?

was using shell optimax (98) with silkolene pro boost taking it upto 100/101 octane?

was this just too high for the engine management?

is this why my car flew after i filled up on the way home?

Oct 14, 2002 | 05:18 AM

Steph

Member

Joined: Feb 2002

Posts: 112

Likes: 0

Did you make more then one run and 15.2 was the best? It seems that most people get far better results on their CLK's by just stomping on the gas and leaving the ESP on. I know I have. Perhaps your wheels are a little heavier then stock and that could be a problem.....maybe tires are over inflated. My geography is not that good but I assume that your altitude is pretty close to sea level ......maybe just a few hundred feet above. Where I am....my times are well over a second slower then at sea level.

Oct 14, 2002 | 05:56 AM

Pffelan

Thread Starter

Senior Member

Joined: Nov 2001

Posts: 254

Likes: 0

From: Chorley Lancashire England

CLK 430 Coupe + MGF + 1980 Camaro

SANTA POD IS IN THE UK IS NEARLY SEA LEVEL...

ran with front at 40psi for low drag and 35 at the back...

the std merc rims were not light...

Oct 14, 2002 | 11:57 AM

RJC

MBWorld Fanatic!

Joined: Feb 2002

Posts: 6,061

Likes: 326

From: 2000 ft over the FL coast in a B-17

Various

Quote:

Originally posted by Pffelan
leftfoot brake at 1500 rpm...

let the car shift...

got creamed....

the wierd thing was on the way to the track was racing 400bhp evo and 300bhp scooby and was not getting creamed down the motorways?

its like there was no torque low down? trap time was 95?

1500 maybe be to low for optimal launch, you'll have to experiment. What about the other questions I asked?

RJC

6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)

Verdad Gallardo

Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun

Verdad Gallardo

Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren

Verdad Gallardo

8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine

Verdad Gallardo

Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction

Verdad Gallardo

Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know

Verdad Gallardo

Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know

Verdad Gallardo

5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve

Verdad Gallardo

Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping

Verdad Gallardo

10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used

Verdad Gallardo

Oct 14, 2002 | 02:46 PM

Pffelan

Thread Starter

Senior Member

Joined: Nov 2001

Posts: 254

Likes: 0

From: Chorley Lancashire England

CLK 430 Coupe + MGF + 1980 Camaro

rjc

car is 2000my with 30000 miles

humidity was high air was v cold - would not say car was thrashed till i got it at 24k ... mb dealer reckons my spark plugs are shot?

pls mail me if i have missed any questions...

petie... reckon you may be right... going again on 27th of this month if it doesnt rain.. so will find out...