Kleemannized Lorinser CLK
Ted
My pop has a clk320 and i also bug him about adding mods and stuff to it, but he never listens to me.
hahaha, add as for the badging...just leave it as CLK 320...then you whup the heck out of someone in a race they'll think..."How in the hell did that V-6 320 beat me?!
Goldeni245
1999 ML320
2001 CLK320
Trending Topics
It only cost $8,400 for the Kleeman supercharger that boost horsepower to 330 and torque to 420?! Dang, that's a quite a deal. I might want to do that...but i've never seen a Mercedes tuner anywhere in the Bay Area, CA. I think most of them are in Southern California?
-Bruce
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
It only cost $8,400 for the Kleeman supercharger that boost horsepower to 330 and torque to 420?! Dang, that's a quite a deal. I might want to do that...but i've never seen a Mercedes tuner anywhere in the Bay Area, CA. I think most of them are in Southern California?
http://www.ex.ac.uk/cimt/dictunit/cctorq.htm
Thanks
Ben
Last edited by Mach430; May 31, 2002 at 01:53 AM.
Thanks
Ben
My CLK 320 is in the shop getting Kleemannized with a Kleeman Supercharger. It is supposed to get 330HP with 410Nm of torque when done. The car already has full Lorinser body kit and LM5 wheels. How should I badge this car when done? Any suggestions? How about LORINSER CLK32K?
Ted
clk43S
reason is it will be unique only one SUNGUL edition
just my opinion....
?
sungul.... you're wierd!
call it original......
wierd i think not
u r just mad cuz ahmed edition doesnt sount too right
but sungul edition its has the right sound to it
lol
although the kompressor is relatively cheap at $8400, but with other upgrades like suspension, brakes, rims, and bodykits that would top you over $13k or more. with that money, you can get a CLK430 in the first place.
CLK 320 OBL EDITION
that should send shivers down your spine my furry little friend!!!
u forgot that u r an arab?????
Very true, providing his car hasn't depreciated in value. But that CLK 430 wouldn't have an upgraded suspension, brakes, rims (or body kit, depending on how you look at it). And the CLK32K is faster than the stock 430.
true, true, but i would stilll take the V8 over the V6 if i get a CLK. the V8 just sounds better. besides, after the upgrade all the warranty will be void, and when the time comes to service the car it will cost more than the stock CLK430.
Where I'm not following you is regarding servicing the car. Nothing has changed in the servicing of my car. Everything is located in the same position it was before (minus the airfilter). My services have been and always will be covered under the scheduled maintenance program. In fact, my the service department at my dealership seems to love working on my car. They put 15 miles on it just changing the door checks! The only service that the dealer can't perform is the 2,000 mile Kleemann checkup.
Thanks
Ben




YES MY FRRRRIEND.... tank yo very much!! yo arrre welllcome to visit ourrrr butiful countrrrrry!!!
also brrrring your girrrrlfrrriend... we show herrrr gooood time!!!
hahahahahahaa......
ok... i go now... my sheeep wayting forrr me!!!
salam!
.............There are two reasons I decided not to switch to a CLK 430. The first reason is explained by the picture below. The secopnd reason is that a stock CLK 430 produces 275HP and 295lb-ft of torque. Kleemann claims that a supercharged CLK 320 will produce 330 HP and 310lb-ft of torque. Recall that a CLK 55 produces 345HP. So, if the claim by Kleemann is correct, then a CLK 430 is not even in the same league as a CLK32K. Besides there are other tricks you can use to coax 350HP from a Kleemannized CLK 320. So, the theory is makes sense, I am not sure how it will work out in practice. My car is in the SHOP now. I will let you know.
Ted





