Kevwood's mods - The Mountain of Goodies
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 4,748
Likes: 0
From: A Canadian in Dubai, United Arab Emirates
'05 C200K SS, '05 Kleemann CLK500K, '08 Hummer H3 & '92 Z34 5sp (track car in Canada)
We test fit it and it looks so good with the black roof, carbon fiber wheels and carbon fiber Vorsteiner spoiler that I decided to leave it for now. I may still paint it later on but I'll see how I like it left black for a few weeks.
Junior Member
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
clk500
Well, went to go pick up the car today after getting some cosmetic stuff done, but they didn't finish the roof rails in black as I asked so it stays for another day. Quick pic here, you can now see how things are starting to take shape and why I selected the wheels (that I like more everytime I do another mod to the car!);
So far I'm very please with how the black and chrome accents are working together. Hope to have a few more pics up tomorrow night after a couple more things are done, there is a lot more than just the roof vinyl...
So far I'm very please with how the black and chrome accents are working together. Hope to have a few more pics up tomorrow night after a couple more things are done, there is a lot more than just the roof vinyl...
HOLD THE PHONE !!!!!!!! how'd you go from regular sun roof to panoramic ??
Junior Member
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
clk500
side note i seen folks smoke the plastic cover of the lights before but never the inside ... like the concept i wonder how it would look tho on a black/black clk ... maybe too much black LOL 
im actually trying to go with a similar concept with my clk except the black version and i want everything to be offseted by crome ...... just sucks and cant get my roof to standout like it does on the light colored cars
im actually trying to go with a similar concept with my clk except the black version and i want everything to be offseted by crome ...... just sucks and cant get my roof to standout like it does on the light colored cars
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 4,748
Likes: 0
From: A Canadian in Dubai, United Arab Emirates
'05 C200K SS, '05 Kleemann CLK500K, '08 Hummer H3 & '92 Z34 5sp (track car in Canada)
As for the lights, I love the black housings on mine, I'm positive they would look great on a black car too.
Super Member
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 501
Likes: 0
From: New Zealand
CLK55 AMG
i wanna do the headlights as well on my silver clk, but not black, maybe a dark grey like the new c63 amg's have... would love to see someone who has that done... I just can't make up my mind about it... when do we get pics of ur car as it is now kev??
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 4,748
Likes: 0
From: A Canadian in Dubai, United Arab Emirates
'05 C200K SS, '05 Kleemann CLK500K, '08 Hummer H3 & '92 Z34 5sp (track car in Canada)
My car is still a ripped apart mess, the audio system is taking way longer than originally planned because I've changed the design a few times. On top of that I bought the new hood, decided to do a bunch of paintwork and a few other custom cosmetic mods. It should be quite stunning when it's finished, we'll see.
I am supposed to have the car back in about 10 days, lots of pics when I do.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,250
Likes: 21
From: Los Angeles, CA
Supercharged CLK500,ML500,S580
Hey Kev, when you did the Quaife LSD install, did you ever install the ///AMG Differential Cover with the fins? I'm going to do the Quaife as well and it would be great to know if that cover is compatible with our diffs.
Also, did you install an oil catch can for your setup?
Also, did you install an oil catch can for your setup?
MB World Stories
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren
Verdad Gallardo
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine
Verdad Gallardo
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction
Verdad Gallardo
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping
Verdad Gallardo
10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used
Verdad Gallardo
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,589
Likes: 68
From: Texas
C63 507 AMG DA Car #19
I put a catch can on my klee car and to my surprise zero accumulation of oil in the can.
It's a wee bit oily in the foam seperator section, but no real liquid level accumulation.
For what it's worth.
My old blown mustang 5.0's with 14psi of boost on 130K mile shortblocks were a diff story....... you had to empty the can it seemed monthly
And at idle the steam/smoke from the breathers could be seen at stoplights coming from under the hood..... I call this a very loose engine
It's a wee bit oily in the foam seperator section, but no real liquid level accumulation.
For what it's worth.
My old blown mustang 5.0's with 14psi of boost on 130K mile shortblocks were a diff story....... you had to empty the can it seemed monthly
And at idle the steam/smoke from the breathers could be seen at stoplights coming from under the hood..... I call this a very loose engine
Member
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
From: Spain
CLK320CDI / M3 E46
The vents on the hood are situated in a low pressure area, in doing so, air is naturally drawn or vacuumed out of high pressures zones. The high pressure zone in this regard is the volume under the hood where air entering through the front grill and passing through the rad saturates the engine bay with heat. At moderate to high speeds the heat is pulled out, at low speeds or a standstill the hot air will naturally find the path of least resistance and exit through the vents.
Both of these scenarios result in greater cooling.
As for turning the vents around, if that were done in place you would be attempting to create a ram-air scenario in a low pressure zone, obviously this will not be effective. The vents would need to be moved far forward on the hood to the front area. Doing this would allow for air to be rammed in, but doing so would be counter productive as it would be forced against the heated under hood air and reduce the cooling effect. The only ram-air setup that would be effective is if it was plumbed into the air intake boxes and thus would have no negative effect on cooling.
As for painting the hood, maybe, maybe not. My original plan was to paint it but after seeing, how flawless it is and it on the car, I am going to leave it for now. I can always paint it later if I think the look is too aggressive for my tastes.
Both of these scenarios result in greater cooling.
As for turning the vents around, if that were done in place you would be attempting to create a ram-air scenario in a low pressure zone, obviously this will not be effective. The vents would need to be moved far forward on the hood to the front area. Doing this would allow for air to be rammed in, but doing so would be counter productive as it would be forced against the heated under hood air and reduce the cooling effect. The only ram-air setup that would be effective is if it was plumbed into the air intake boxes and thus would have no negative effect on cooling.
As for painting the hood, maybe, maybe not. My original plan was to paint it but after seeing, how flawless it is and it on the car, I am going to leave it for now. I can always paint it later if I think the look is too aggressive for my tastes.
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 4,748
Likes: 0
From: A Canadian in Dubai, United Arab Emirates
'05 C200K SS, '05 Kleemann CLK500K, '08 Hummer H3 & '92 Z34 5sp (track car in Canada)
I'm glad you said scratching and not pleasuring...Hey Kev, when you did the Quaife LSD install, did you ever install the ///AMG Differential Cover with the fins? I'm going to do the Quaife as well and it would be great to know if that cover is compatible with our diffs.
Also, did you install an oil catch can for your setup?
Also, did you install an oil catch can for your setup?
As for a catch can, that's next, I'm going to be installing 2 of them. Details and reasoning later
I put a catch can on my klee car and to my surprise zero accumulation of oil in the can.
It's a wee bit oily in the foam seperator section, but no real liquid level accumulation.
For what it's worth.
My old blown mustang 5.0's with 14psi of boost on 130K mile shortblocks were a diff story....... you had to empty the can it seemed monthly
And at idle the steam/smoke from the breathers could be seen at stoplights coming from under the hood..... I call this a very loose engine
It's a wee bit oily in the foam seperator section, but no real liquid level accumulation.
For what it's worth.
My old blown mustang 5.0's with 14psi of boost on 130K mile shortblocks were a diff story....... you had to empty the can it seemed monthly
And at idle the steam/smoke from the breathers could be seen at stoplights coming from under the hood..... I call this a very loose engine
I'm a pretty thourough guy when it comes to builds, I've got a wee bit of experience
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 358
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta, GA
19 C300
Wow... Looking good! IMO. The hood should be painted.... The car is so clean and still has an OEM look like you set out for. Perhaps some sort of custom fade near the vents so some of the sexy weave shows thru?
Just an idea
I want that rear spoiler!!! Custom painted of course so that just a little hint of the Cf shows up along the trailing edge
Just an idea
I want that rear spoiler!!! Custom painted of course so that just a little hint of the Cf shows up along the trailing edge
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 4,748
Likes: 0
From: A Canadian in Dubai, United Arab Emirates
'05 C200K SS, '05 Kleemann CLK500K, '08 Hummer H3 & '92 Z34 5sp (track car in Canada)
Wow... Looking good! IMO. The hood should be painted.... The car is so clean and still has an OEM look like you set out for. Perhaps some sort of custom fade near the vents so some of the sexy weave shows thru?
Just an idea
I want that rear spoiler!!! Custom painted of course so that just a little hint of the Cf shows up along the trailing edge
Just an idea
I want that rear spoiler!!! Custom painted of course so that just a little hint of the Cf shows up along the trailing edge
The original idea I had for the hood was to paint it but leave the vents CF. I've got it on the car now and will (when I get it back) dive it as is to see if I like it. You are 100% Right though, my whole build theme has been "OEM'ish" and leaving the hood CF will take it in a whole different direction.Time will tell
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,250
Likes: 21
From: Los Angeles, CA
Supercharged CLK500,ML500,S580
I put a catch can on my klee car and to my surprise zero accumulation of oil in the can.
It's a wee bit oily in the foam seperator section, but no real liquid level accumulation.
For what it's worth.
My old blown mustang 5.0's with 14psi of boost on 130K mile shortblocks were a diff story....... you had to empty the can it seemed monthly
And at idle the steam/smoke from the breathers could be seen at stoplights coming from under the hood..... I call this a very loose engine
It's a wee bit oily in the foam seperator section, but no real liquid level accumulation.
For what it's worth.
My old blown mustang 5.0's with 14psi of boost on 130K mile shortblocks were a diff story....... you had to empty the can it seemed monthly
And at idle the steam/smoke from the breathers could be seen at stoplights coming from under the hood..... I call this a very loose engine
I know of some Kleemann SC owners are complaining of the spark plugs going foul after less than 10K miles; I was figuring the oil blow back was the root cause. I'm reaching 10K miles with my SC installed and I haven't checked my plugs yet. I've never done it before so I'm kind of hesitant doing so.
I do remember you mentioning that the way you installed your catch can was probably not optimal (you referred to the E55 board for a better way of installing), so I'm curious on what Kev has found.
There was a mix-up during the install, the tech forgot it was in the trunk and it didn't go on. So, not sure if it's a fit or not. MB said they will put it on for free for me when things slow down in the summer.
As for a catch can, that's next, I'm going to be installing 2 of them. Details and reasoning later
As for a catch can, that's next, I'm going to be installing 2 of them. Details and reasoning later
Thanks pal The original idea I had for the hood was to paint it but leave the vents CF. I've got it on the car now and will (when I get it back) dive it as is to see if I like it. You are 100% Right though, my whole build theme has been "OEM'ish" and leaving the hood CF will take it in a whole different direction.
Time will tell
The original idea I had for the hood was to paint it but leave the vents CF. I've got it on the car now and will (when I get it back) dive it as is to see if I like it. You are 100% Right though, my whole build theme has been "OEM'ish" and leaving the hood CF will take it in a whole different direction.Time will tell
If it rained, will the water seep into the vents and into the engine? I know your doing this for your track days and will probably not drive in the rain (doubt it rains much out there anyways); but if someone did use it as a daily driver, you think that would be an issue?
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 4,748
Likes: 0
From: A Canadian in Dubai, United Arab Emirates
'05 C200K SS, '05 Kleemann CLK500K, '08 Hummer H3 & '92 Z34 5sp (track car in Canada)
I bet it would look great, but it will not have that OEM sleeper look!
If it rained, will the water seep into the vents and into the engine? I know your doing this for your track days and will probably not drive in the rain (doubt it rains much out there anyways); but if someone did use it as a daily driver, you think that would be an issue?
If it rained, will the water seep into the vents and into the engine? I know your doing this for your track days and will probably not drive in the rain (doubt it rains much out there anyways); but if someone did use it as a daily driver, you think that would be an issue?
Okay, as for the vents, yes, rainwater and water when the car is washed (and the sand that blows around here for that matter) is going to get in there and on the engine, there is no question about that whatsoever. However, I'm not concerned about it at all, I ran (and still do) open vents on my Z34 and they are far larger than the ones on my CLK carbon fiber hood - I never had an issue.
What I'll do is when I eventually get the car back (the audio guy is seriously dragging his ***) I'll get more pics of the vents and the placement in relation to the underhood layout.
For the catch can(s), yeah, I've got a great idea, just need to oder up suitable sized ones and get them all plumbed in. Traveling outside the counrty all week everyweek makes it a ***** to get anything done on my car.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,589
Likes: 68
From: Texas
C63 507 AMG DA Car #19
I originally plumbed my catch can to catch all air venting from all 3 nipples on the valve covers.
this was routed to the catch can, then
the outlet of the catch can was sent to the elbow inet in front of the TB, and the little nippleinlet after the TB.
THIS WAS WRONG. After reviewing the needswings catch can plumbing i modified to their setup which is:
Plumb the two small nipples (one on each valve cover) into the catch can, then the outlet of the catch can to the nipple inlet after the TB. Leave the large vent hose from the drivers side valve cover plumbed to the elbow before the TB.
this was routed to the catch can, then
the outlet of the catch can was sent to the elbow inet in front of the TB, and the little nippleinlet after the TB.
THIS WAS WRONG. After reviewing the needswings catch can plumbing i modified to their setup which is:
Plumb the two small nipples (one on each valve cover) into the catch can, then the outlet of the catch can to the nipple inlet after the TB. Leave the large vent hose from the drivers side valve cover plumbed to the elbow before the TB.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,250
Likes: 21
From: Los Angeles, CA
Supercharged CLK500,ML500,S580
I originally plumbed my catch can to catch all air venting from all 3 nipples on the valve covers.
this was routed to the catch can, then
the outlet of the catch can was sent to the elbow inet in front of the TB, and the little nippleinlet after the TB.
THIS WAS WRONG. After reviewing the needswings catch can plumbing i modified to their setup which is:
Plumb the two small nipples (one on each valve cover) into the catch can, then the outlet of the catch can to the nipple inlet after the TB. Leave the large vent hose from the drivers side valve cover plumbed to the elbow before the TB.
this was routed to the catch can, then
the outlet of the catch can was sent to the elbow inet in front of the TB, and the little nippleinlet after the TB.
THIS WAS WRONG. After reviewing the needswings catch can plumbing i modified to their setup which is:
Plumb the two small nipples (one on each valve cover) into the catch can, then the outlet of the catch can to the nipple inlet after the TB. Leave the large vent hose from the drivers side valve cover plumbed to the elbow before the TB.
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 4,748
Likes: 0
From: A Canadian in Dubai, United Arab Emirates
'05 C200K SS, '05 Kleemann CLK500K, '08 Hummer H3 & '92 Z34 5sp (track car in Canada)
I originally plumbed my catch can to catch all air venting from all 3 nipples on the valve covers.
this was routed to the catch can, then
the outlet of the catch can was sent to the elbow inet in front of the TB, and the little nippleinlet after the TB.
THIS WAS WRONG. After reviewing the needswings catch can plumbing i modified to their setup which is:
Plumb the two small nipples (one on each valve cover) into the catch can, then the outlet of the catch can to the nipple inlet after the TB. Leave the large vent hose from the drivers side valve cover plumbed to the elbow before the TB.
this was routed to the catch can, then
the outlet of the catch can was sent to the elbow inet in front of the TB, and the little nippleinlet after the TB.
THIS WAS WRONG. After reviewing the needswings catch can plumbing i modified to their setup which is:
Plumb the two small nipples (one on each valve cover) into the catch can, then the outlet of the catch can to the nipple inlet after the TB. Leave the large vent hose from the drivers side valve cover plumbed to the elbow before the TB.
) My idea will be to isolate the two systems and capture all of the crap.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,250
Likes: 21
From: Los Angeles, CA
Supercharged CLK500,ML500,S580
That's half of what my plan is. The valve covers and the PCV system work off of different vacuum rates, the covers via Venturi effect (before the TB) and the PCV via constant vacuum (after the TB, hence the addition of the PCV valve). They both introduce vapors and oil residue into the manifold, or in the case of the three of us (Jeff, Carlos and I) the supercharger (we are in damn goo company aren't we ) My idea will be to isolate the two systems and capture all of the crap.
) My idea will be to isolate the two systems and capture all of the crap.Kev and Jeff,
Maybe you guys would know the answer to these questions.
I want to get some cams in the future and I heard the OEM 55k will give me a good hp boost! I can probably get them for a better price than the PTE/Kleemann cams. Have you heard anything about them?
Are 55K Heads compatible with the 500 engine? Are the 55K cams lye inside the cylinder heads?
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 4,748
Likes: 0
From: A Canadian in Dubai, United Arab Emirates
'05 C200K SS, '05 Kleemann CLK500K, '08 Hummer H3 & '92 Z34 5sp (track car in Canada)
Went by the shop today and had another look at the car, the audio guy has put in quite a bit more work since the *** chewing I gave him last Saturday, he should be finished all his work by Thursday. A few more parts showed up as well, that's just about everything now. It's looking like it will be ready to get into the paint booth next Saturday and get all finished up.
Seems like I dropped the car off a year ago now..
Cams were a big topic when I was getting my Kleemann build all figured out, I wanted to know exactly what my options were so the rep spoke with Kleemann and got info for me, this is what I was told;
1. The Kleemann cams that were manufactured were direct copies of the 55K cams and added about 12-15HP when used with the Kleemann SC and ECU tune.
2. Since the cams were copies of the 55K cams, yes, the cams between the 500,55 and 55K are all interchangeable.
3. The 'new' Kleemann cams are a more aggressive grind and can add about 20-25HP when used with the Kleemann SC and ECU tune.
Based on this information I went with the new Kleemann cams. How factual and accurate the info/numbers are, well, that's anyone's guess. When I finally get the car back and have the TCU tune done, I will be able to get it on their dyno and get some actual numbers at last.
Seems like I dropped the car off a year ago now..
Okay, now I understand your plan! Hope you don't mind if I mimic it!
Kev and Jeff,
Maybe you guys would know the answer to these questions.
I want to get some cams in the future and I heard the OEM 55k will give me a good hp boost! I can probably get them for a better price than the PTE/Kleemann cams. Have you heard anything about them?
Are 55K Heads compatible with the 500 engine? Are the 55K cams lye inside the cylinder heads?
Kev and Jeff,
Maybe you guys would know the answer to these questions.
I want to get some cams in the future and I heard the OEM 55k will give me a good hp boost! I can probably get them for a better price than the PTE/Kleemann cams. Have you heard anything about them?
Are 55K Heads compatible with the 500 engine? Are the 55K cams lye inside the cylinder heads?
1. The Kleemann cams that were manufactured were direct copies of the 55K cams and added about 12-15HP when used with the Kleemann SC and ECU tune.
2. Since the cams were copies of the 55K cams, yes, the cams between the 500,55 and 55K are all interchangeable.
3. The 'new' Kleemann cams are a more aggressive grind and can add about 20-25HP when used with the Kleemann SC and ECU tune.
Based on this information I went with the new Kleemann cams. How factual and accurate the info/numbers are, well, that's anyone's guess. When I finally get the car back and have the TCU tune done, I will be able to get it on their dyno and get some actual numbers at last.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,589
Likes: 68
From: Texas
C63 507 AMG DA Car #19
I was told the pte cams are the most aggressive so I went with those.
Honestly you really can't tell my car has cams, it idles like stock IMHO.
I'm guessing this is due to the tune and or ported heads.
Didn't know about new vs old klee cams. That's good to know. I wonder how the new klee cams compare to the pte variants and/or the SLR variants?
** no oil in the catch can with the needswings hose routing.
Honestly you really can't tell my car has cams, it idles like stock IMHO.
I'm guessing this is due to the tune and or ported heads.
Didn't know about new vs old klee cams. That's good to know. I wonder how the new klee cams compare to the pte variants and/or the SLR variants?
** no oil in the catch can with the needswings hose routing.
Last edited by betrezra; Mar 17, 2012 at 05:54 PM.
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 4,748
Likes: 0
From: A Canadian in Dubai, United Arab Emirates
'05 C200K SS, '05 Kleemann CLK500K, '08 Hummer H3 & '92 Z34 5sp (track car in Canada)
I was told the pte cams are the most aggressive so I went with those.
Honestly you really can't tell my car has cams, it idles like stock IMHO.
I'm guessing this is due to the tune and or ported heads.
Didn't know about new vs old klee cams. That's good to know. I wonder how the new klee cams compare to the pte variants and/or the SLR variants?
** no oil in the catch can with the needswings hose routing.
Honestly you really can't tell my car has cams, it idles like stock IMHO.
I'm guessing this is due to the tune and or ported heads.
Didn't know about new vs old klee cams. That's good to know. I wonder how the new klee cams compare to the pte variants and/or the SLR variants?
** no oil in the catch can with the needswings hose routing.
I have a slight chop at an idle, when the car comes back I will be taking it in for a TCU flash and have it run on their dyno, at that time we will data log everything and see if the ECU tune needs to be cleaned up.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,257
Likes: 5
From: Chicago
2015.5 Volvo V60 Polestar
Went by the shop today and had another look at the car, the audio guy has put in quite a bit more work since the *** chewing I gave him last Saturday, he should be finished all his work by Thursday. A few more parts showed up as well, that's just about everything now. It's looking like it will be ready to get into the paint booth next Saturday and get all finished up.
Seems like I dropped the car off a year ago now..
Cams were a big topic when I was getting my Kleemann build all figured out, I wanted to know exactly what my options were so the rep spoke with Kleemann and got info for me, this is what I was told;
1. The Kleemann cams that were manufactured were direct copies of the 55K cams and added about 12-15HP when used with the Kleemann SC and ECU tune.
2. Since the cams were copies of the 55K cams, yes, the cams between the 500,55 and 55K are all interchangeable.
3. The 'new' Kleemann cams are a more aggressive grind and can add about 20-25HP when used with the Kleemann SC and ECU tune.
Based on this information I went with the new Kleemann cams. How factual and accurate the info/numbers are, well, that's anyone's guess. When I finally get the car back and have the TCU tune done, I will be able to get it on their dyno and get some actual numbers at last.
Seems like I dropped the car off a year ago now..
Cams were a big topic when I was getting my Kleemann build all figured out, I wanted to know exactly what my options were so the rep spoke with Kleemann and got info for me, this is what I was told;
1. The Kleemann cams that were manufactured were direct copies of the 55K cams and added about 12-15HP when used with the Kleemann SC and ECU tune.
2. Since the cams were copies of the 55K cams, yes, the cams between the 500,55 and 55K are all interchangeable.
3. The 'new' Kleemann cams are a more aggressive grind and can add about 20-25HP when used with the Kleemann SC and ECU tune.
Based on this information I went with the new Kleemann cams. How factual and accurate the info/numbers are, well, that's anyone's guess. When I finally get the car back and have the TCU tune done, I will be able to get it on their dyno and get some actual numbers at last.
Keep it coming
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 4,748
Likes: 0
From: A Canadian in Dubai, United Arab Emirates
'05 C200K SS, '05 Kleemann CLK500K, '08 Hummer H3 & '92 Z34 5sp (track car in Canada)
Car is 'supposed' to be done on Saturday, not holding my breath though. Doesn't really matter in the end because I am going on vacation for a week starting Friday, wifey and I are going to lay on the beach in the Maldives
