New Supercharged CLK55
Hey Greg still waiting for a reply to my post!
Last edited by ProjectC55; Dec 18, 2005 at 11:25 AM.
Mario
Mario
On the other side, it would be ideal if I could just open up the injector pulse from the EEC to give more fuel, instead of having to 'push' more fuel through the injectors using higher fuel pressure by way of a FMU. That requires getting at the EEC code using a tuner.$$$$
coolcarlskiC43, any idea on these injectors for the CLK55's. I have polled many and found that different year model 5.4L engines have different injectors. Mine are the White injectors. A shop told me that White are 57lb/hr and the blue other cars are 44lb/hr.
57lb/hr are big injectors and that would not suprise me however. That allows the EEC to use a mush smaller pulse width at a little higher pressure(50psi in our case) to feed the engine. In the Ford world the stock fuel pressure is 40psi, Mercedes 5.4L its 50psi. Maybe the Mercedes desiin team could get better emmissions.
I would like to figure out if we at about at the limit.
So how to change injectors:
Option 1: get bigger injectors and matching MAF. This will work, even without changing EEC code. The issue is that the EEC using tables to look up Load info. It also uses for other parameters. If this was a FORD engine, fine. Much to costly of a engine to change things.
Option 2; get bigger injectors and matching MAF and have a tuner edit the EEC tables. $$$ and requires a tuner in Texas with the SW.
coolcarlskiC43: Its good to have others that play with these cars on the discussions.
PS,I would think you would be safe with 450 or 550cc inj but I have to find out the poundage and color to verify.I know that the Supra TT 3.OL uses 550cc injectors stck.These inj are usually good for up to 450hp if not more.
Last edited by ProjectC55; Dec 19, 2005 at 02:12 PM.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Mario I'm not 100 % sure which way I wanna go but I am leading towards the Split second stuff. Custom ECU tuning can run into alot of dough.The advantage I see to custom tuning it is that you perhaps would not have to adjust the fuel based on weather changes.I'm hoping that's not the case with the split second setup. I know that the weather affects APEXi AFC equipped cars where you have to either add fuel some days and trim it some the next.
PS,I would think you would be safe with 450 or 550cc inj but I have to find out the poundage and color to verify.I know that the Supra TT 3.OL uses 550cc injectors stck.These inj are usually good for up to 450hp if not more.
Thanks again
Mario
I should have some data to share this weekend.
I should have some data to share this weekend.
http://www.fiveomotorsport.com/Injector_SetsFORD.asp
Pink 22lb/hr
Red 30
blue 24
white 36
orange 19
http://www.fiveomotorsport.com/Injector_SetsFORD.asp
Pink 22lb/hr
Red 30
blue 24
white 36
orange 19
Fuel Injector Spotters Guide and Information
So, how much power is this injector good for? That depends on the air/fuel ratio that is used, but a good rule of thumb is to divide this flow figure by 5 to get a hp capability. So, 322cc divided by 5 = 64hp maximum fuel flow with this injector. If you want to be pedantic, it's the mass of the fuel (not the volume) which is the critical factor. Assuming a "normal" fuel density, the mass of the fuel in pounds per hour can be worked out by Dividing the cc per minute figure by 10.2. For this injector, that gives a mass flow of 32 pounds/hour. To convert from pounds/hour to horsepower capability, multiply the figure by 2.04. So 32 pounds/hour multiplied by 2.04 gives a horsepower capability of 64hp - the same as we got from the cc/minute figure.
The power ratings discussed above are for each injector. This means that you need to multiply this rating by the number of injectors that are to be used. So, if you were using the Impulse RS 322cc injectors in a 4 cylinder engine (with one injector per cylinder) the max power that the injectors could deliver fuel for would be about 257hp. All of these figures are assuming that you are running an average fuel pressure of ~43psi and at 90% duty cycle.
Conversions
500cc per minute is approximately equal to 49lbs per hour which is equal to approximately 100hp.
lbs/hour = cc per minute / 10.2
lbs per hour = HP / 2.04
cc per minute = lbs per hour x 10.2
cc per minute = HP x 5
HP = cc per minute / 5
HP = lbs per hour x 2.04
So 73.44hp x 8(cyl)=587.52 bhp plenty of fuel!Alot of the F/I BMW's putting out 500+ Crank hp are using 36-42 lb injectors.
You can do it by CC's as well. 300cc inj divided by 5= 60hp (per inj) mult by 8(cyl) you have 480 crank hp
Bad news first; this got me some better boost low, but nothing up high. 7-7.3psi max at 6K. Man, that clk55 engine is a good breather. It just says give me more air flow. I can spin the powerdyne faster, with better bearings, but its the air flow of the unit. The 55 engine can suck faster than this unit can put out. Bigger blower is needed.
Good news; with the 12;1 FMU and the boost-a-pump, I have all the fuel I need. My estimates is that I could go to about 9-10psi with this setup. A good steady 83psi across the board, which is about as high as you want.
Using the Split second timing/MAF unit, I am reducing the MAF signal to lean it out. That is good, becasue the MAF pegs today at 5000RPM anyway.
I tested the timing retard and it does seem to work well. In my setup, I remove 1.5degrees per pound of boost. Up top I am reducing 10.5 degrees.
They say you get about 16-18HP to the ground per pound of boost. You then subtract about 4HP per degree of timing removed. So my guess is
290HP dyno tested stock to the ground HP
16*7 = 112
4*7 = 28
Net HP gain ~84HP
If I am about right, I should see ~375HP to the ground. The Auto trany is about 20% loss. So just going rough 375*1.2 = 450 Bass Crank HP?
I really think with my water injection and reduced timing the engine can handle 9psi with margin.
The question is do I go with a Vortech SQ? I want a soft sounding unit. All the other centrif superchargers are loud. Even the SQ is not the best.
I may just stay as-is.
Off to te dyno in a couple of weeks.
By the way. In stead of the boost-a-pump you may try the bigger pumps I found. My pump is the option #1, which is bigger than the stock unit. However, I found that the voltage the pump gets is about 10.5 to 11Volts at higher RPM. Not a lot of voltage. That is why the boost-a-pump is a voltage driver. In summary, even with a better pump option, I am not solf it would help much. It seem the boost-a-pump is the best way to insure good voltage.
P.S. this is perhaps the single best thread on mbworld.org due to the wealth of detail you are providing on such an esoteric DIY project. Much Kudos to you!
Last edited by c55m8o; Jan 11, 2006 at 11:01 PM.
I am thinking getting the option 2 pump that you mentioned...
the reason for me not going for boost a pump because I don't want to over drive the pump with 13 14volts... and of course price issue
Do you think it will be enough flow without using the boost a pump...
(the worse case, I can ge the #2 pump and later on add a boost a pump to it if I needed to)
btw., what brand FMU are you using now. I am thinking getting another kind of FMU ., the Vortech unit I am using now can't handle the rail pressure and the plate bended a couple times..
Last edited by mtimmy; Jan 12, 2006 at 04:47 AM.
I am thinking getting the option 2 pump that you mentioned...
the reason for me not going for boost a pump because I don't want to over drive the pump with 13 14volts... and of course price issue
Do you think it will be enough flow without using the boost a pump...
(the worse case, I can ge the #2 pump and later on add a boost a pump to it if I needed to)
btw., what brand FMU are you using now. I am thinking getting another kind of FMU ., the Vortech unit I am using now can't handle the rail pressure and the plate bended a couple times..
Last edited by ProjectC55; Jan 12, 2006 at 06:17 AM.
I always thought the gauge of the wire limits the current but not the voltage... the higher the voltage the lower the current ... *I may be wrong though*
just a thought...
I always thought the gauge of the wire limits the current but not the voltage... the higher the voltage the lower the current ...
The science is, you provide voltage, and based how much resistance there is in the circuit (by circuit in this context, I mean device, or motor, or pump), the exact amount of current is =drawn=.
(V = I * R) examples:
Provide 13.5V, where Resistance = 1 ohm, and circuit will draw 13.5 amps.
Provide 13.5V, where Resistance = 10 ohm, and circuit will draw 1.35 amps.
Now, here's how the wire affects driving the pump...
If you have high resistance (high gauge #'ed wire) there's a loss in the wire, and thus a voltage =drop= between the two ends of the wire (example, say 13.5V on the power side of the wire but only 11V making it to the motor side of the wire), so you have less voltage available to drive the motor. Driving the motor with less voltage, where the resistance is a constant, the motor will draw less current; draw less current and the device operates under less power -- specifically by the square of the difference in current from if you drove the pump by 13.5V or 11V. (P = I^2 * R)
Last edited by c55m8o; Jan 13, 2006 at 12:16 PM.
and., that don't seem to be a hard task for us.... since our battery is in the back., there is only a very short distrance we have to run the wire




