Supercharger: Kleemann vs Renntech vs AMG
Which twin-screw Supercharger is the most efficient?
Kleemann - uses the Autorotor brand from Sweden.
Renntech - uses the Lysholm brand from Sweden also.
AMG - uses the IHI brand from Japan.
I have attached an article from Kenne Bell explaining the differences.
Do you agree with the article?
http://home.comcast.net/~wviands/sto...eBellinfo.html
It looks like from what I've read on the net that in terms of Power/Efficiency/Quality the rankings fall in this order.
1) Autorotor 2) Lysholm 3) IHI and 4) Eaton
Based on my reading, IHI SC's are basically copies of the Lysholm at a lower cost masss produced level that were installed in the AMG E,CL, S & SL models as described here:
http://www.europeancarweb.com/firstl...amg/index.html
Last edited by AMGSC; Feb 3, 2008 at 03:51 AM.
http://www.svtperformance.com/forums...5&pagenumber=2
with proper considerations/build and component choices the ultimate efficiency of the supercharger isn't all that important to how much power you can make. Just buy a larger one if you need to.
that said- ihi is on my crap list right now. had a vf22 fail two weeks ago.
with proper considerations/build and component choices the ultimate efficiency of the supercharger isn't all that important to how much power you can make. Just buy a larger one if you need to.
that said- ihi is on my crap list right now. had a vf22 fail two weeks ago.
The basic problem with my HPS Gen II kit (Roots style) is that first off, it was poorly designed (i.e. Intake Port, Plenum shape, Cheap Intercooler that also blocked air from entering 2 back cylinders, lousy air-box, cheap pump) and secondly the Roots style as everybody knows is extremely inefficient and builds enormous heat. The lobes/rotors also spin in a different direction and forces air around the OUTSIDE of the case instead of through the middle of the lobes, thus requiring a bigger case and blower to make the same cfm. This longer path circuitus rout also causes friction and also air leak back into the lobe chambers when the air trys to enter the combustion chamber. The gaps/tolerances on the roots lobes are also not as tight. A forum member named TechTune spent a great deal of money to fix the kit components and is making much better power than the standard HPS kit but I spent about the same as he did and just got a used Kleemann twin-screw since Kleemann now uses the Eaton Roots style on their new kits as well. Most likely for cost reduction reasons rather than performance I guess.
Last edited by AMGSC; Feb 3, 2008 at 02:21 PM.
He and VRP are highly respected by everyone on this forum.
Why not simply utilize their vast knowledge to properly engineer your proposed upgrade?
if you ask me your best option is none of the above. if you are really serious about pushing the limits of any of those kits (which you would have to be in order to have it matter how efficient it really was between them) then you should most likely go turbo or centrifugal charger. You won't be able to use the low end grunt the ts could provide anyways unless you swap in a new solid axle and slicks, basically.
Trending Topics
if you ask me your best option is none of the above. if you are really serious about pushing the limits of any of those kits (which you would have to be in order to have it matter how efficient it really was between them) then you should most likely go turbo or centrifugal charger. You won't be able to use the low end grunt the ts could provide anyways unless you swap in a new solid axle and slicks, basically.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Do you know if your twin-screw has 4 male x 6 female lobe Autorotor or a 3 male x 5 female Lysholm? Did you ever get a chance to look inside the case?
I will ask Vadim to check mine.








