CLK63 Black Series vs. (997)911TT
Yes, I think absolutely believe the CLK DTM is worth the premium. Apparently the BS is not because you can already find them for less than $135K. I'm not the only one who thinks they are not worth the premium or they would be going for more. Heck, the R8 is much more difficult to find going for less the MSRP, even with some miles on it. I think the BS is a great car but simply not worth the $50K premium. Maybe with some more power, an SMG or dual clutch tranny or even the new transmission updated SL. The market price for the car ultimately will decide whether it is worth it or not. If it falls below 135K, then I think my argument has merit, if it is at 135K or higher, then I'll certainly admit that the car is worth the premium.
I guess I can't expect too much objectivity on a BS forum. Clearly you all think the car is worth it but just because you do, it doesn't mean others have to. Like I said, I also don't think the R8 is worth what Audi is asking for it. It does sometimes happen that cars are excessively priced. Look at the CL65. An 06 CL65 that went for $186K is now going for considerable less at auction. Well less than $100.
I still, for the life of me can't figure how you could rationalize $250,000+ for a DTM and think a Black Series is not worth the price. I agree with you on the Audi R8, I think it is a beautiful car, but it is in dire need of an additional 100hp. The scary part is that people are paying $25,000 over list for R8's. As for the CL you saw at auction, the 06 was the old body, the O7 CL 65's are fetching sticker and above in some markets.
"Weight ready for driving* 1,742 kg"
"*per EU guidlines 92/21 with driver (88 kg), tank filled to 90% and luggage (7 kg)"
So starting with the 1,742 kg = 3,840 lbs., you should deduct the included weights of the 150 lb driver, 127 lbs of fuel, 15 lbs of luggage. This will net out at about 3,550 lbs dry.
Rated horsepower per AMG 582, torque 800 Nm = 590 ft. lbs.
Personal observation. The road-going CLK-DTM's that were at the Nurburgring event would FLY past the regular CLK63 coupe that I was driving on a long uphill pull on the backside of the Nordschleiffe. I was driving in a straight line, getting all I could out of this coupe, and they would blast by at at least 30 mph faster, and continuing accelerating uphill, until they disappeared from view. And, this CLK63 was not a slow car by any means, on the long front straight, I was clocking 270 kph (165 mph in round numbers), but there was just no contest between these two vehicles. The CLK-DTM is truly in a different performance class.
There is also the prototype AMG P900, which is even a step above the CLK-DTM, but still not a true DTM car.
Final note, just so there is no confusion. The CLK-DTM is a model of a road-going Mercedes-AMG. A true DTM is a purpose-built race car that is a true state of the art racing vehicle. It has virtually nothing in common with any production car with the exception of a small section of the roof which by the racing rules must come from a production car. I presume at one time, this regulation made sense, but since I don't know the evolution of the rule, it seems like a very strange requirement. The DTM's are crazy wonderful cars.
JDB
It was kind of funny because I went to Germany a couple of years ago and visited the AMG factory. They were working on the convertible version of the CLK DTM car their customization shop. My tour guide said that they build 100 CLK DTM road cars and they were all sold and they were now working on the convertible version and we were looking at cars #66 and #67. She said for the hardtop CLK DTM car that there was 1 customer from the US, California. I wouldn't be surprised if she was talking about the Capena car.
Thanks for the link. I think Canepa is puffing a bit. I can tell you that a CLK DTM doesn't weigh 800 lbs. less than a Black. The ROW Blacks have almost the same interior so I don't know where AMG is saving the weight. Although you can do some one off stuff at the AMG studio now, it wasn't open in 2004How do you verify the one of twelve at 625 hp claim. If there was a news release or legit, the gum shoes on these boards would have found it somewhere. The five cars delivered to the US had to be privateers, not though the authorized dealer network. Ask him about the warrantee and where was it delivered. But the real tip off for BS and I don't mean Black is the 0-60 in 3 seconds.

Yes, I think absolutely believe the CLK DTM is worth the premium. Apparently the BS is not because you can already find them for less than $135K. I'm not the only one who thinks they are not worth the premium or they would be going for more. Heck, the R8 is much more difficult to find going for less the MSRP, even with some miles on it. I think the BS is a great car but simply not worth the $50K premium. Maybe with some more power, an SMG or dual clutch tranny or even the new transmission updated SL. The market price for the car ultimately will decide whether it is worth it or not. If it falls below 135K, then I think my argument has merit, if it is at 135K or higher, then I'll certainly admit that the car is worth the premium.
I guess I can't expect too much objectivity on a BS forum. Clearly you all think the car is worth it but just because you do, it doesn't mean others have to. Like I said, I also don't think the R8 is worth what Audi is asking for it. It does sometimes happen that cars are excessively priced. Look at the CL65. An 06 CL65 that went for $186K is now going for considerable less at auction. Well less than $100.
I'm certainly not here to offend anyone and I know people who own the car will defend it. It is pretty odd for me to be on the other side of an MB argument because I am a huge fan. I have a heavily modified '02 SLK 32 that I will never sell. It is in southern California now with VRP getting some more modifications. The AMG factory visit is one of the best things to do in Germany.
I asked the question because I've been consider a BS myself and whether it is worth premium or not. I don't think the R8 is and I also question the BS. Maybe at $115 or $120K yes but at $135K, yikes. It just seems like a lot for the delta over a regular CLK63, especially if the CLK63 coupe were available in the US. I guess to me, I don't see the BS and CLK DTM to be in the same class and that's why I can justify the premium for it over the BS. However, that is just my opinion. Clearly you and others think differently which is fine by me.
jcart, I'm following your modification project with Evosport. Very cool. Can't wait to see the finished product.
Last edited by SteveL; Feb 20, 2008 at 01:21 PM.
One more thing, and then I will drop it, the CLK DTM 0-60 is 3.8 or 3.9 seconds, depending on the publication you read. A Black Series is 4.0-4.1 seconds 0-60. Every publication or web site I check has the Black series out braking the DTM 60-0 by 5-8 feet and from 100-0 8-12 feet. The weight difference is 25-40 pounds depending on publication and source. Top speed of the DTM is 202, top speed on the BS is an Electronically Limited 186 and it gets there, I can verify that...so, do you still think the DTM is worth $250,000+? I would not be suprised if the introduction of the Black Series actually hurt the value of the DTM's.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Read what JDB wrote about the CLK DTM car. Yes, I still think it is worth it. More than 3 times more rare than the BS, way more rare in the US (only 5 or 6 of them) and very unique.
http://canepa.com/inventory/collect/...DTM/index.html
Note that they state that the engine has been modified to produce 625 hp.
JDB
http://canepa.com/inventory/collect/...DTM/index.html
Note that they state that the engine has been modified to produce 625 hp.
JDB
... what happened to




that was cheaper than (& almost as entertaining as) a UFC pay-per-view

getting back to an interesting comment ...

PS - the BS is pretty cool ... not sure the price is justified, but I like it alot. there are just too many 911's in So Cal, but say GT-2 & I switching. (yeah I know the price diff & it's slighty off topic).
PPS -at the end of the day, most of us are car enthausiasts w/ our own personal taste and biases ... clearly. peace!
PPPS- squeezing out the true performance potential of any vehicle lies in the hands (& feet) of the driver. you can
over tenths of seconds & fistfulls of HP all you want 
PPPPS- ummmm oh yeah

OK, I asked the question, Mike Martin is the AMG product guru, His answer on the private lounge is" To my knowledge ALL of the CLK DTM vehicles only have 580 hp".
Could the factory have done a one off. Sure for a boat load of money, but not likely prior to the opening of the AMG Studio. Secondly, there not going to do that conversion knowing its coming to the US becasue it's not a certified car. So my conclusion is that a privateer brought it over and had Canepa certify it. Curious that the block has been strenthened which would suggest SLR componets. It would be interesting to see the documents that Canepa has. I've met Bruce C on several occasions and I think he's a reputible guy becasue when you deal at this level of toys, the buyers all have lawyers.

I just reviewed the PL chat session and saw AMG's reply to you.
I also looked on the CANEPA site at their CLK DTM photos and the engine does not appear to have the bigger inter-coolers to support 625 hp.
Could the factory have done a one off. Sure for a boat load of money, but not likely prior to the opening of the AMG Studio. Secondly, there not going to do that conversion knowing its coming to the US becasue it's not a certified car. So my conclusion is that a privateer brought it over and had Canepa certify it. Curious that the block has been strenthened which would suggest SLR componets. It would be interesting to see the documents that Canepa has. I've met Bruce C on several occasions and I think he's a reputible guy becasue when you deal at this level of toys, the buyers all have lawyers.

One more thing, did anyone else notice the grill and hood is all jacked up on the drivers side? Looks like it hit a bird at 200mph or it got hit with a baseball or something. Is that a CF, aluminum or steel hood?
One more thing, did anyone else notice the grill and hood is all jacked up on the drivers side? Looks like it hit a bird at 200mph or it got hit with a baseball or something. Is that a CF, aluminum or steel hood?
I am super envious of you being in a position to buy it. Honestly, if it were in my price range, I would have written the check while I was looking at the car that day.
Last edited by SteveL; Feb 21, 2008 at 11:14 AM.
I am super envious of you being in a position to buy it. Honestly, if it were in my price range, I would have written the check while I was looking at the car that day.



