CLK63 Black Series vs. (997)911TT
How can you make a statement that the CLK BS is not special enough to have a $50K premium, and then the next thing out of your mouth it that the DTM is???? A DTM goes for nearly $200K! A CLK BS is rated at 500HP and the DTM is rated at 574HP, everyone knows that on a dyno the DTM's are only making in the ball park of 445HP vs CLK BS 420HP at the wheels. So you are saying that the extra 25 HP you get with the BS over a standard CLK 63 Cabrio is not worth $50,000, but the extra 25 HP you get with the DTM is????? In addition to the extra 25HP you get in the BS you get lots of extra goodies that you can't get in a standard CLK 63. How many extra goodies does the the DTM offer over the BS? Not many!
You say the CLK BS is heavy, It's 26 pounds heavier than the DTM 3880 vs 3854! All of the specs I have read show the CLK BS out braking the DTM by 5-8 feet fom 60-0. the only legit arguement you can make is that the DTM is more rare 100 or so copies vs 500 BS's.
My last point will be made in a week when I pick my car up from Evosport. For well under $200k I will have a car that will smoke a DTM CLK, in a straight line or on a road course and it's nearly as rare. How many CLK BS's have you seen on the road? Does anyone out there with a DTM want to try to prove me wrong? I'm up for the challenge.
You have a good point, however, you are missing the fact that CLK DTM is a collector's item with a limited production run of 100 units, while CLK63BS is just another mass-produced vehicle. DTM's value has nothing to do with performance, but everything with exclusivity.
Lap times on the ring do not really tell the difference in these two vehicles.
If you have the means to buy the car, I would take it for a spin and then let us know how you think it compares.
Lap times on the ring do not really tell the difference in these two vehicles.
If you have the means to buy the car, I would take it for a spin and then let us know how you think it compares.
When the DTM was produced in 2005 it was MILES ahead of anything AMG had produced as a road going car (other then the CLK GTR.) It has taken until 2008 for them to produce anything even close in the CLK Black Series.
I still think that even with 3 years of additional development it is just close.
Performance - TORQUE The torque of the DTM in that chassis is INSANE. The DTM pulls like a SL65 without the Turbo lag. Throttle response is crisp and direct. Steering provides the best feedback of any modern AMG to date. Turn in is crisp in a way that solid bushings provide direct feedback. You immediately get the feeling that this car was built for the track and less compromises were made for the DTM to be a street car. The transmission is one of the best parts of the vehicle. This is the only mercedes that you can truly feel a shift pop off.
Interior- The car is all business carbon fiber. Not just a bit here and there but everywhere. Doors, console, rear area, all business. Racing seats, harness tie ins all done to AMG spec.
Styling - some say it is a bit riceish but for me it was pure agressive sex in 2005 when it was released. It still has one of the hottest asses in town.
For me, to compare the DTM with the Black is a bit of a stretch. The DTM's were a hand built series of 100 vehicles produced in Affalterbach with no holds barred. The cars started as basic CLK's and were torn down and completely rebuilt from scratch. The Black as awesome as it is in my eyes, still has a production flair to it.
With 200K, I am sure that I could build many cars that will outperform the CLK DTM but it will still not be a CLK DTM.
Now if they could have only had it weigh 3100 lbs........
I have said it before on this forum. I still think the CLK DTM will go down in history as one of the baddest cars to ever wear the Mercedes Star.
Just my .02
Schiz
When the DTM was produced in 2005 it was MILES ahead of anything AMG had produced as a road going car (other then the CLK GTR.) It has taken until 2008 for them to produce anything even close in the CLK Black Series.
I still think that even with 3 years of additional development it is just close.
Performance - TORQUE The torque of the DTM in that chassis is INSANE. The DTM pulls like a SL65 without the Turbo lag. Throttle response is crisp and direct. Steering provides the best feedback of any modern AMG to date. Turn in is crisp in a way that solid bushings provide direct feedback. You immediately get the feeling that this car was built for the track and less compromises were made for the DTM to be a street car. The transmission is one of the best parts of the vehicle. This is the only mercedes that you can truly feel a shift pop off.
Interior- The car is all business carbon fiber. Not just a bit here and there but everywhere. Doors, console, rear area, all business. Racing seats, harness tie ins all done to AMG spec.
Styling - some say it is a bit riceish but for me it was pure agressive sex in 2005 when it was released. It still has one of the hottest asses in town.
For me, to compare the DTM with the Black is a bit of a stretch. The DTM's were a hand built series of 100 vehicles produced in Affalterbach with no holds barred. The cars started as basic CLK's and were torn down and completely rebuilt from scratch. The Black as awesome as it is in my eyes, still has a production flair to it.
With 200K, I am sure that I could build many cars that will outperform the CLK DTM but it will still not be a CLK DTM.
Now if they could have only had it weigh 3100 lbs........
I have said it before on this forum. I still think the CLK DTM will go down in history as one of the baddest cars to ever wear the Mercedes Star.
Just my .02
Schiz
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
If you look at all Mercedes body styles, then it gives you the option to select CLK 63 AMG. I ran that search just now and got a total of 159 cars that fall into the broad paramater of CLK 63 AMG. Of those 159 cars for sale, most all are CABRIOLETS, and most dealers use the BS as a file photo and say they have 4 in stock....guaranteed they are referring to cabs....not to mention the multiple BS for sale that have no photo or any other information which are clearly brokers...
Autotrader is not a viable or reliable resource to comment on the BS market.
http://www.autotrader.com/fyc/search...WVz__&systime=
They are not like Honda Accords, but there are 7 of them on ebay right and 19 used ones on autotrader. I think at one point I saw 30 for sale at the same time, (which is more than SL65's). When was the last time you saw a CLK-DTM for sale?
Last edited by Addicted2Speed; Feb 22, 2008 at 10:05 PM.
Price range is
Range of prices within this search:
Highest Price: $179,990
Lowest Price: $119,900
Average Price: $138,977
So unless regular CLK63s have dramatically increased in price, this is just covering BS cars.
Here is a link if you can't figure it out: BS in Autotrader
If you look at all Mercedes body styles, then it gives you the option to select CLK 63 AMG. I ran that search just now and got a total of 159 cars that fall into the broad paramater of CLK 63 AMG. Of those 159 cars for sale, most all are CABRIOLETS, and most dealers use the BS as a file photo and say they have 4 in stock....guaranteed they are referring to cabs....not to mention the multiple BS for sale that have no photo or any other information which are clearly brokers...
Autotrader is not a viable or reliable resource to comment on the BS market.
Last edited by SteveL; Feb 23, 2008 at 12:23 AM.

There is a huge diff between 79 and 88. I can't believe you actually counted.

There is a huge diff between 79 and 88. I can't believe you actually counted.

I was simply surprised how many were listed as available. I thought they had pretty much sold out and the only ones I would find were brokers trying to make a profit.And since LZH is counting autotrader is now reporting 89.
Search Results
We found 89 Mercedes-Benz listings any distance from Saratoga, CA.
The MSRP was $127,000 and the only "option" was Gas Guzzler tax, that's it.
Nice car, but I heard some customers say, "It's still just an overpriced CLK!"
Last edited by SoCalCLK; Feb 23, 2008 at 01:32 PM.






