2017 GTS Brake pads for CCB’s




Is this another quirk for carbon ceramic brakes? At what mm thickness front/back is it recommended to change the pads? would be good to know since this is the first time ive had ccbs on my car. Ty
Is this another quirk for carbon ceramic brakes? At what mm thickness front/back is it recommended to change the pads? would be good to know since this is the first time ive had ccbs on my car. Ty
Swapping pads early can significantly extend rotor life, which might last through two or three pad sets with iron rotors, and even longer with carbon-ceramic rotors.
Here are some considerations:
Heat Management and Fade Resistance: A thicker brake pad has more thermal mass and material to absorb and dissipate heat. As pads wear down, they lose their ability to handle high temperatures without glazing, fading, or transferring uneven deposits to the rotor.
By the time you’re at ~2 mm, pads heat up much faster, which can cause brake fade especially in repeated or emergency braking.
Wear Unevenness: Pads don’t always wear evenly, inner vs. outer pads can differ significantly. Caliper slide pins, piston sticking, or rotor runout can make one pad thinner than the other.
By changing pads early, you avoid discovering one side is already dangerously thin.
Performance, Noise, Vibration, and Harshness: Worn pads (below ~30%) are more prone to squealing, vibration, and longer stopping distances.
Installing new pads on a worn or uneven rotor is never a good idea.
Last edited by G. P; Oct 1, 2025 at 10:34 AM.
I'm currently using RSC1
Front: Pagid Racing RSC1 (8088-RSC1)
Rear: Pagid Racing RSC1 (8246-RSC1)
These are track pads but I've heard 0 noise from them (bed them in correctly)
Swapping pads early can significantly extend rotor life, which might last through two or three pad sets with iron rotors, and even longer with carbon-ceramic rotors.
Here are some considerations:
Heat Management and Fade Resistance: A thicker brake pad has more thermal mass and material to absorb and dissipate heat. As pads wear down, they lose their ability to handle high temperatures without glazing, fading, or transferring uneven deposits to the rotor.
By the time you’re at ~2 mm, pads heat up much faster, which can cause brake fade especially in repeated or emergency braking.
Wear Unevenness: Pads don’t always wear evenly, inner vs. outer pads can differ significantly. Caliper slide pins, piston sticking, or rotor runout can make one pad thinner than the other.
By changing pads early, you avoid discovering one side is already dangerously thin.
Performance, Noise, Vibration, and Harshness: Worn pads (below ~30%) are more prone to squealing, vibration, and longer stopping distances.
Installing new pads on a worn or uneven rotor is never a good idea.
Is there a particular thickness at which you think I should be changing the pads provided I would like to extend rotor life and that im 90% street driving and no tracking.
Noise may come if you live in a colder climate area. A typical phenomenal for high performance pads.
Is there a particular thickness at which you think I should be changing the pads provided I would like to extend rotor life and that im 90% street driving and no tracking.
From my experience with AMG GT pads, when new, most are 10-11 mm front and 12-13 mm rear for friction metal (not including the metal backing)
Trending Topics
It's heat that "kills" -- chemically deteriorates -- the CCB rotors and street driving should never get brakes hot enough, often enough to create noticeable wear. Even for ardent "canyon carvers," I suspect the heat generated is largely a non-issue. It's going to take serious track use to significantly degrade the type of CCB rotors that Mercedes uses on its more modern vehicles. I don't know whether Mercedes ever used the older type of CCB rotors that didn't have the Carboteq wear-limit markings, but they were reputed to wear quickly with track use, but I've never seen any actual data that proved that, either.
Using the Carboteq analysis tool, I've been "tracking" the track-related wear on the CCB rotors on my GTR Pro and now have enough data to be relatively confident that I should get 40+ track days out of my CCBs, even though my local and most frequented track is brutal on brakes. I've posted some data on this at
https://mbworld.org/forums/coupe-roa...ml#post9196616
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
It's heat that "kills" -- chemically deteriorates -- the CCB rotors and street driving should never get brakes hot enough, often enough to create noticeable wear. Even for ardent "canyon carvers," I suspect the heat generated is largely a non-issue. It's going to take serious track use to significantly degrade the type of CCB rotors that Mercedes uses on its more modern vehicles. I don't know whether Mercedes ever used the older type of CCB rotors that didn't have the Carboteq wear-limit markings, but they were reputed to wear quickly with track use, but I've never seen any actual data that proved that, either.
Using the Carboteq analysis tool, I've been "tracking" the track-related wear on the CCB rotors on my GTR Pro and now have enough data to be relatively confident that I should get 40+ track days out of my CCBs, even though my local and most frequented track is brutal on brakes. I've posted some data on this at
https://mbworld.org/forums/coupe-roa...ml#post9196616
It seems that pads under CCB rotors are holding much better.
Are you using MB OEM pads or other after market?
It’s remotely similar to breaking in some engines in a manner of speaking.
Heat causes Oxidation which decreases the mass of the CCB rotors, so you want to minimise increased heat transfer to the rotor as much as you can.
If taking the car on a road course and driving it like it’s designed, think about brake ducts; (Tikt comes to mind), and replacing the RSC1s when they’ve worn 66% from new. This will enhance rotor longevity.
As mentioned above: the outer and inner pads wear differently. The inners wear more quickly and are prone to taper; (this from a Tech whilst attending an AMG Academy driving event at COTA). So, pay very close attention to the inner pads.
Major point: Pads are orders of magnitude cheaper than CCB rotors.
In the U.S., the OEM pads and PAGID RSC1 are similarly priced ( about US$ 750 per complete fron and rear sets) .
The RSC1 pads also offer excellent stopping performance in colder conditions, with a coefficient of friction of 0.43 at 100 °C.




These are the PAGID pads that will fit the AMG OEM calipers that were design for CCB rotors:
Front:RSC1 Shape # 8088
Rear: RSC1 Shape # 8246
https://www.pagidracing.com/products/race-products/racing-brake-pads
https://www.pagidracing.com/products/race-products/racing-brake-pads/product-search
Last edited by G. P; Oct 5, 2025 at 09:53 AM.
Last edited by untamedd; Oct 18, 2025 at 03:09 PM.











